Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07YEREVAN564
2007-05-04 12:39:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Yerevan
Cable title:  

ARMENIA ELECTIONS: KOCHARIAN CONVOKES OSCE CHIEFS

Tags:  PGOV PHUM KDEM OSCE AM 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO5692
PP RUEHDBU
DE RUEHYE #0564/01 1241239
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 041239Z MAY 07
FM AMEMBASSY YEREVAN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5487
INFO RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO PRIORITY 0332
RUEHLMC/MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORP WASHDC PRIORITY 0034
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 YEREVAN 000564 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/05/2017
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KDEM OSCE AM
SUBJECT: ARMENIA ELECTIONS: KOCHARIAN CONVOKES OSCE CHIEFS
OF MISSION

REF: TALLINN 280

YEREVAN 00000564 001.2 OF 002


Classified By: CDA A.F.Godfrey for reason 1.4 (b, d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 YEREVAN 000564

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/05/2017
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KDEM OSCE AM
SUBJECT: ARMENIA ELECTIONS: KOCHARIAN CONVOKES OSCE CHIEFS
OF MISSION

REF: TALLINN 280

YEREVAN 00000564 001.2 OF 002


Classified By: CDA A.F.Godfrey for reason 1.4 (b, d)


1. (C) SUMMARY: On May 3, President Kocharian convoked all
Chiefs of Mission of OSCE Member States resident in Yerevan
regarding the upcoming parliamentary elections. He sought to
convey to the dip corps that his administration was doing all
it could to ensure an election process which should meet with
the approval of observer groups, and he pushed hard for an
objective assessment. He expressed pride about the conduct
of the pre-election period so far, and praised the productive
relationship his staff had established with observer groups.
He was pleased that opposition groups had thus far refrained
from extremist rhetoric or calls for illegal actions. He
warned that law enforcement bodies were well-prepared and
well-equipped to handle any sort of anti-state protest. CDA
used the opportunity to acknowledge the high level of
candidate access to voters, both through the media and public
assembly, and urged that this trend continue. END SUMMARY.


2. (C) Kocharian opened the meeting by expressing his
general satisfaction with the conduct of the pre-election
campaign thus far. He warned that in the coming days, the
ability of his administration to influence the conduct of the
poll would wane; responsibility was now transferring from the
central government to the local level, to the many
local-level election commissions. He was proud of the way
all candidates had been able to engage with the voters, and
in particular, for the way the media had presented a balanced
view. Singling out CDA for needling, he declared that this
was the best demonstration of political will he could be
expected to make. (NOTE: In a press event the previous day,
CDA said that with technical pre-conditions largely in place,
good elections were now a matter of strong political will.
END NOTE.)


3. (C) Kocharian said he was pleased with the way candidates
had approached the campaign. Even opposition politicians had
avoided the extremist rhetoric so prevalent in 2003. At that

time, Kocharian continued, some politicians were under the
"color revolution euphoria" and thought that calls for
unlawful action against the state would produce results in
Armenia as well. Now, however, politicians understand that
these tactics do not work, he said. Nevertheless, he warned
that law enforcement institutions were well-equipped and
well-prepared for any eventuality and would take action to
defend the state. Referring to police action in Tallinn on
April 26 in response to protests (reftel),he noted wryly
that "our Estonian colleagues showed us how it should be
done. There were no complaints about that, so we will follow
their example."


4. (C) Kocharian said that significant work had been done to
improve the voter registry for this election, and while an
entirely error-free list was impossible for any country,
Armenia would have on May 12 the best list it could produce
in this timeframe, thanks in part to support from
international partners.


5. (C) Kocharian took pains to praise the work so far of the
observer groups. He expressed satisfaction with the
readiness of ODIHR Director Strohal and Election Observer
Mission head Amb. Frlec to engage with him and his staff. He
laid out three specific requests -- to which he referred
later in the meeting as demands -- for all observers, and
asked COMs to pass these on to their compatriots:

- Observers should report only that which they observe, and
not events which they have heard about from other parties.
- Observers should, in accordance with Armenian law,
register their presence at polling places which they visit.
They should also record, in the polling place log, any
violations they observe.
- Observers should not become part of the political process.


6. (C) Kocharian alleged that following the 2003 elections,
OSCE reports cited violations at polling places which had
never been visited by international observers. He also
complained bitterly that ODIHR rules prevented GOAM officials
from participating in the process of drafting reports or from
gaining access to primary source materials from observer
groups. "It is my job to defend the honor and dignity of
Armenia," Kocharian said, and he could not do that if kept
out of the process. CDA said that in his outbrief to OSCE
COM's, ODIHR Director Strohal had said that it was against
ODIHR practice to register at polling places and that to
register suspected violations in the polling place log was to
make OSCE observers a part of the Armenian Criminal Justice
process. Kocharian said that Strohal had agreed that

YEREVAN 00000564 002.2 OF 002


observers could register their presence and said that under
no circumstances would any observer be called to be part of a
court proceeding. (NOTE: In a May 4 meeting with the Deputy
Head of the ODIHR EOM, we learned that observers will, in
fact, be instructed to register at polling places, but will
be strictly instructed not/not to write anything other than
their names and their time of arrival into the log. END
NOTE.)


7. (C) German Ambassador Heike Peitsch reported that she and
members of her staff had heard consistent rumors about
vote-buying. Kocharian acknowledged that such rumors
existed, and that it was not beyond the realm of possibility
that this practice would take place in single-mandate
districts. The prevalent rumors about vote-buying for the
party-list contest were silly. If a candidate were to pay
the rumored price of AMD 20,000 per vote, it would take more
than USD 5 million to buy 100,000 votes; this many votes --
if indeed voters stayed bought -- would not even assure a
majority in parliament. He acknowledged that some candidates
are taking a more obvious path, paving roads, doing repairs
to public buildings and the like.


8. (C) Kocharian closed the meeting by warning COMs not to
encourage radical politicians to take illegal actions. "We
have the resources to deal with such actions," Kocharian
added.
GODFREY