Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07USUNNEWYORK827
2007-10-08 13:58:00
CONFIDENTIAL
USUN New York
Cable title:
62ND UNGA: SIXTH COMMITTEE- UN SECRETARIAT NOTE
how-toVZCZCXYZ0003 RR RUEHWEB DE RUCNDT #0827 2811358 ZNY CCCCC ZZH R 081358Z OCT 07 FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK TO SECSTATE WASHDC 2717
C O N F I D E N T I A L USUN NEW YORK 000827
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/05/2017
TAGS: UNGA UNGA
SUBJECT: 62ND UNGA: SIXTH COMMITTEE- UN SECRETARIAT NOTE
ON CRIMINAL ACCOUNTABILITY OF UN OFFICIALS
REF: 00790
Classified By: Ambassador Alejandro D. Wolff, for reasons 1.4(b) and (d
).
C O N F I D E N T I A L USUN NEW YORK 000827
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/05/2017
TAGS: UNGA UNGA
SUBJECT: 62ND UNGA: SIXTH COMMITTEE- UN SECRETARIAT NOTE
ON CRIMINAL ACCOUNTABILITY OF UN OFFICIALS
REF: 00790
Classified By: Ambassador Alejandro D. Wolff, for reasons 1.4(b) and (d
).
1. (C) USUN Legal Adviser contacted ASyG for Legal Affairs
Larry Johnson October 5 to advise him, per reftel, that the
United State would prefer that the UN not issue its draft
note on "Criminal Accountability of United Nations Officials
and Experts on Missions" as an official document. Johnson
responded that the note had been circulated as an official
document today. (Note: It is dated September 11, the date
the UN submitted it for translation).
2.(C) USUN had previously expressed concern about this note
in which the Secretariat expresses unsolicited views about
issues currently being negotiated by member states. In a
conversation on September 24, USUN told Johnson that the
note, distributed informally to Sixth Committee
representatives, was a departure from the practice that the
Office of Legal Affairs does not produce opinions unless
mandated by a Committee and that the Secretariat maintains a
neutral stance in negotiations among member states. Johnson
was informed that USUN expected to receive an instruction to
request the UN not to circulate the note. He said that the
note had been prepared by the Department of Peacekeeping
Operations with some OLA input and had been cleared by his
office. Johnson said that he would inform the UN Legal
Counsel, Nicolas Michel of U.S. views and that an official
request that it not be circulated was anticipated.
3.(C) In an earlier conversation, when USUN first raised
this issue with the OLA attorney directly involved in
preparing the document, he said that because of the subject
matter - UN Personnel - the UN felt their views would be of
interest to member states. USUN Legal Adviser pointed out
that positions taken by the Secretariat could prejudice the
negotiations. Comment. Both the staff attorney and
subsequently Johnson seemed to understand that publication of
the paper overstepped the bounds of the Secretariat's mandate
but proceeded nevertheless. End Comment.
KHALILZAD
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/05/2017
TAGS: UNGA UNGA
SUBJECT: 62ND UNGA: SIXTH COMMITTEE- UN SECRETARIAT NOTE
ON CRIMINAL ACCOUNTABILITY OF UN OFFICIALS
REF: 00790
Classified By: Ambassador Alejandro D. Wolff, for reasons 1.4(b) and (d
).
1. (C) USUN Legal Adviser contacted ASyG for Legal Affairs
Larry Johnson October 5 to advise him, per reftel, that the
United State would prefer that the UN not issue its draft
note on "Criminal Accountability of United Nations Officials
and Experts on Missions" as an official document. Johnson
responded that the note had been circulated as an official
document today. (Note: It is dated September 11, the date
the UN submitted it for translation).
2.(C) USUN had previously expressed concern about this note
in which the Secretariat expresses unsolicited views about
issues currently being negotiated by member states. In a
conversation on September 24, USUN told Johnson that the
note, distributed informally to Sixth Committee
representatives, was a departure from the practice that the
Office of Legal Affairs does not produce opinions unless
mandated by a Committee and that the Secretariat maintains a
neutral stance in negotiations among member states. Johnson
was informed that USUN expected to receive an instruction to
request the UN not to circulate the note. He said that the
note had been prepared by the Department of Peacekeeping
Operations with some OLA input and had been cleared by his
office. Johnson said that he would inform the UN Legal
Counsel, Nicolas Michel of U.S. views and that an official
request that it not be circulated was anticipated.
3.(C) In an earlier conversation, when USUN first raised
this issue with the OLA attorney directly involved in
preparing the document, he said that because of the subject
matter - UN Personnel - the UN felt their views would be of
interest to member states. USUN Legal Adviser pointed out
that positions taken by the Secretariat could prejudice the
negotiations. Comment. Both the staff attorney and
subsequently Johnson seemed to understand that publication of
the paper overstepped the bounds of the Secretariat's mandate
but proceeded nevertheless. End Comment.
KHALILZAD