Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07USUNNEWYORK718
2007-08-31 22:21:00
CONFIDENTIAL
USUN New York
Cable title:  

PROPOSED RAPE RESOLUTION AT UNGA 3RD COMMITTEE

Tags:  PHUM SOCI UNGA KFEM 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0003
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUCNDT #0718/01 2432221
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 312221Z AUG 07
FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 2531
C O N F I D E N T I A L USUN NEW YORK 000718 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR IO:KSILVERBERG, MSINGH, GJREES, IO/RHS, DRL/MLA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/30/2017
TAGS: PHUM SOCI UNGA KFEM
SUBJECT: PROPOSED RAPE RESOLUTION AT UNGA 3RD COMMITTEE

REF: A. REES-HAGEN TELECON 8/27/07

B. LUM-SHESTACK 8/9/07 E-MAIL

C. SHESTACK-LUM 8/14/07 E-MAIL

Classified By: Amb. Alejandro D. Wolff, for reasons 1.4(B) and (D)

SUMMARY
C O N F I D E N T I A L USUN NEW YORK 000718

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR IO:KSILVERBERG, MSINGH, GJREES, IO/RHS, DRL/MLA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/30/2017
TAGS: PHUM SOCI UNGA KFEM
SUBJECT: PROPOSED RAPE RESOLUTION AT UNGA 3RD COMMITTEE

REF: A. REES-HAGEN TELECON 8/27/07

B. LUM-SHESTACK 8/9/07 E-MAIL

C. SHESTACK-LUM 8/14/07 E-MAIL

Classified By: Amb. Alejandro D. Wolff, for reasons 1.4(B) and (D)

SUMMARY

1.(SBU) Summary: Mission recommends introducing the draft
rape resolution under the committee agenda item on women's
issues rather than human rights, in order to maximize the
chances of attaining consensus. We also foresee a need to
expand the scope of the resolution and to ensure co-sponsors.
End Summary.

ADVANCEMENT OF WOMEN OR HUMAN RIGHTS?



2. (C) In deciding whether to run the draft UNGA Third
Committee resolution entitled "Condemning the Use of Rape as
an Instrument of State Policy" (ref B) under Agenda Item 65
("Advancement of Women") or Agenda Item 72 ("Human Rights"),
Department should bear in mind the tactical and substantive
consequences of such a decision. Tactically, running the
rape resolution under the Women's agenda item would be
consistent with the 3rd Committee's recent emphasis on
violence against women (VAW) under this item. Last year the
Netherlands and France ran an omnibus consensus resolution on
"Intensification of efforts to eliminate all forms of
violence against women" (A/RES/61/143) in response to the
Secretary-General's study on "Ending violence against women."

SIPDIS
Other delegations will find it reasonable to address the
question of rape under this agenda item, as one of the many
aspects of VAW. The norm under this agenda item is to adopt
resolutions by consensus. The most contentious issues in
negotiations are usually
raised by Egypt, Syria and Pakistan, without, however, much
support from other developing countries.


3. (C) Under the Human Rights agenda item, most of the
resolutions are contentious and are put to a vote. Cuba
plays a leading and active role on many issues under this
item, and enlists a large number of the developing countries
in support of its positions. Anything which is seen as a
U.S. initiative, regardless of its merits, stands a good
chance of being put to a vote, or eliciting killer amendments
from the floor. If killer amendments passed which alleged

violence against women by troops in Iraq (as in a recent UN
report on VAW in conflict situations),it is possible to
envision the U.S. being forced to vote against its own draft
resolution.


4. (C) Moreover, mission would question the wisdom of
treating violence against women, which we treat as criminal
behavior, in a human rights context. Indeed, to advocate a
human rights approach to issues of violence against women may
be contrary to larger U.S. foreign policy aims in the sphere
of human rights law. The SYG's study on "Ending violence
against women" states that perceiving VAW as a human rights
issue would enhance the stature of the Convention on the
Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and the
Beijing Platform for Action -- two documents which the U.S.
refuses to reaffirm. The study also says that addressing VAW
as a human rights concern will provide a "unifying set of
norms that can be used to hold States accountable for
adhering to their obligations." Including a women's issue in
3rd Committee as a human rights concern may serve to undercut
the overarching U.S. cautious approach to the enhancement of
customary international law.

CEDAW AND ICC



5. (C) Whether taken up under a.i.65 or a.i.72, other
delegations are almost certain to propose amendments which
would reaffirm CEDAW and the Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court (ICC),both of which will be
seen by the Europeans, Latin Americans and others as directly
relevant to the question of rape in situations of conflict.
The U.S. was maneuvered into withdrawing its sponsorship of a
draft resolution on early forced marriage at the Commission
on the Status of Women (CSW) when the EU successfully put
forward an amendment reaffirming CEDAW and the Beijing
Declaration.

EXPANDED SCOPE



6. (C) Regardless of which agenda item we choose, we
anticipate that other delegations will want to amend the
title of the resolution and add references to other instances
of rape during armed conflict, not just those committed as

state policy. In previous resolutions, all delegations have
condemned rape by soldiers, militia, police authorities,
etc., and have called for an end to impunity for
perpetrators. USDel would find it very difficult to argue
against calls for such an expansion of the scope of the
resolution to cover such reprehensible actions. We may
encounter attempts to bring sexual exploitation by
peacekeepers into the resolution, as well.

CONCLUSION



7. (C) We see little to be gained in opening a topic under
the human rights agenda item which could be fraught with
killer amendments from the Cubans or others, putting us into
a potentially embarrassing position of voting against or
abstaining on a condemnation of rape. On the other hand, we
foresee a reasonable chance of building a consensus around a
draft resolution under the Women's agenda item, provided that
it is expansive enough to cover rape by government forces,
acting under orders or on their own, as well as by rebels or
others. Finally, the U.S. will need to find co-sponsors for
this resolution, since the final product will surely contain
objectionable references to CEDAW, Beijing and the ICC, which
will require us ultimately to withdraw our own
co-sponsorship.
WOLFF