Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07USUNNEWYORK619
2007-07-27 23:18:00
CONFIDENTIAL
USUN New York
Cable title:  

UN/DRC SANCTIONS: UNANIMOUS COUNCIL SUPPORT FOR

Tags:  DRC PREL UNSC PGOV ETTC 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0007
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUCNDT #0619/01 2082318
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 272318Z JUL 07
FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK
TO RUEHKI/AMEMBASSY KINSHASA IMMEDIATE 1249
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 2351
INFO RUEHGG/UN SECURITY COUNCIL COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/CJCS WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J-3// IMMEDIATE
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC IMMEDIATE
C O N F I D E N T I A L USUN NEW YORK 000619 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/27/2017
TAGS: DRC PREL UNSC PGOV ETTC
SUBJECT: UN/DRC SANCTIONS: UNANIMOUS COUNCIL SUPPORT FOR
RENEWED SANCTIONS IN DRC


Classified By: COUNSELOR MARY C. PHEE, FOR REASONS 1.5 (B) AND (D).

C O N F I D E N T I A L USUN NEW YORK 000619

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/27/2017
TAGS: DRC PREL UNSC PGOV ETTC
SUBJECT: UN/DRC SANCTIONS: UNANIMOUS COUNCIL SUPPORT FOR
RENEWED SANCTIONS IN DRC


Classified By: COUNSELOR MARY C. PHEE, FOR REASONS 1.5 (B) AND (D).


1. (C) SUMMARY: Peruvian PermRep Jorge Voto-Bernales, who
is the chairman of the DRC Sanctions Committee ("the
Committee"),briefed the Security Council on June 23 on the
occasion of the Committee's annual sanctions review. There
was Council consensus that the sanctions regime--which
consists of an arms embargo and targeted sanctions on
individuals violating the embargo, recruiting child soldiers,
or impeding disarmament, and which expires on July 31--should
be renewed. Voto-Bernales reported to the Council that the
Committee had considered the latest report of the DRC Group
of Experts, which found that the continued presence of
illegal armed groups in the DRC represented a serious threat
to stability in the region, and that the sanctions on
individuals were rarely enforced by DRC authorities. Council
members are currently negotiating a French draft resolution
to renew the sanctions regime and the mandate of the Group of
Experts, which also expires on July 31. End summary.

--------------
DRC SANCTIONS REVIEW
--------------


2. (C) In advance of the July 31 expiration of the sanctions
regime in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Peruvian
PermRep and Chairman of the DRC Sanctions Committee Jorge
Voto-Bernales briefed the Council on June 23 on the outcome
of the Committee's annual sanctions review. Ambassador
Voto-Bernales noted that several Committee members had stated
their support for renewing sanctions, and that the Committee
had agreed on possible actions to improve their
implementation based recommendations from the DRC Group of
Experts (&the Group8),the body charged with investigating
sanctions violations. Ambassador Voto-Bernales also reported
that the Committee had designated two additional individuals
and five entities for sanctions in March (note: on the joint
initiative of USUN, the UK, and France) and had met with
representatives of the DRC, Rwanda, Uganda, and Burundi on
issues of implementation in those countries.


3. (C) Following Ambassador Voto-Bernales's briefing, the

French delegation expressed concern that illegal armed groups
continue to traffic in arms, and noted the increasing risk of
widespread conflict in the region. The French also
introduced a draft resolution to renew the sanctions--which
consist of an arms embargo and an international travel ban
and assets freeze on individuals found to be violating the
embargo, recruiting child soldiers, or impeding
disarmament--and the mandate of the Group of Experts, which
also expires on July 31. The draft is currently under
negotiation by Council members. Belgium stated that
maintaining the sanctions was important for the future of
Congo, and that it supported clarifying in the upcoming
resolution the exemptions to arms embargo for the Government
of the DRC. USUN noted its concern with the deteriorating
security situation in the DRC and stressed that the Sanctions
Committee had a specific role to play in bringing pressure to
bear on those individuals whose actions undermine stability
in the DRC. Italy argued that the sanctions regime in the
DRC illustrated that sanctions work only where states have
the capacity to implement them, and also that the Council
should reassess the sanctions regime in light of the newly
elected government in the DRC. Italy added, however, that it
hoped that the sanctions against recruiting child soldiers
would be maintained.

-------------- --------------
BACKGROUND: COMMITTEE CONSIDERS THE GROUP'S REPORT
-------------- --------------


4. (SBU) On July 12 and 20 the Committee considered the
Group's June 13 report, which concluded--as did its two
previous reports--that the continued presence of illegal
armed groups in the DRC represented a serious threat to
stability in the region. The report noted that the sanctions
imposed in March on two major gold exporting companies in
Uganda found to be financing militias, UCI and Machanga, were
successful in halting their operations. However, it also
found that the international travel ban and an assets freeze
sanctions on those individuals designated by the Committee
were rarely enforced by DRC authorities, and sanctioned
individuals continued their daily activities with impunity.


5. (C) Although the Committee did agree on possible actions
to improve sanctions implementation based on the Group's


recommendations, Committee members overwhelmingly considered
the specific recommendations to be beyond the competence of
the Committee to implement. For example, the Group suggested
that the most effective way to address aerial violations of
the arms embargo would be to restructure the DRC aviation
sector. (USUN noted that this was a long-term
capacity-building endeavor that far exceeded the Committee's
ability to act upon.) The actions the Committee agreed to
therefore consisted mainly of taking note of the
recommendations or referring them for comment to the
international bodies competent to assess their usefulness.


6. (C) USUN stressed that the Committee did not have a
mandate to develop capacity in the DRC, and it must now turn
its attention back to the core of its mandate, which was
considering violations of the arms embargo and imposing
sanctions accordingly. The past two reports of the Group of
Experts have been heavily focused on addressing the
underlying causes of the instability in eastern DRC, which
has made that their recommendations of marginal use to the
Committee in sanctioning specific individuals.
KHALILZAD