Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07USUNNEWYORK574
2007-07-13 19:58:00
UNCLASSIFIED
USUN New York
Cable title:  

WEST AFRICAN STATES ASK FOR HELP IN COMBATING

Tags:  PREL PTER XY KFTN KCRM 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0005
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUCNDT #0574/01 1941958
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 131958Z JUL 07
FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 2258
UNCLAS USUN NEW YORK 000574 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

IO/PSC, S/CT

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PTER XY KFTN KCRM
SUBJECT: WEST AFRICAN STATES ASK FOR HELP IN COMBATING
TERRORISM

UNCLAS USUN NEW YORK 000574

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

IO/PSC, S/CT

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PTER XY KFTN KCRM
SUBJECT: WEST AFRICAN STATES ASK FOR HELP IN COMBATING
TERRORISM


1. (U) SUMMARY: The UN Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive
Directorate (CTED) held an informal meeting on July 11 to
address the technical assistance needs of West African states
in fulfilling their counter-terrorism obligations under
Security Council resolution 1373. Present at the meeting
were members of the CTED staff, West African member states,
potential and current technical assistance providers, and a
number of non-governmental and inter-governmental
organizations. The West African recipient states mentioned
many common areas in which they require technical assistance
during the meeting. In response, donor states and
organizations expressed a willingness to offer aid to the
West African states in a variety of ways. END SUMMARY.


2. (U) Chairman of the Counter Terrorism Committee (CTC)
Ambassador Ricardo Alberto Arias noted that technical
assistance is most effective on a regional and sub-regional
basis because neighboring states face similar challenges. He
characterized this meeting as an opportunity for providers of
technical assistance and West African recipient states to
engage in dialogue on effective terrorism prevention. Arias
also stressed the need for a coherent global approach to
counter-terrorism.


3. (U) Sergey Karev, Officer-in-Charge of CTED, remarked
that West African states lack key technology and sufficient
funds to implement counter-terrorism conventions and
resolutions. He outlined CTED,s three major goals in
facilitating technical assistance. One goal is to collect
and analyze information about West African shortfalls in
implementation. Another goal is to organize consultation on
these shortfalls. The last goal is to find and match donor
states to provide technical assistance to the West African
states. Karev described the CTED matrix, which organizes
technical assistance data, as a good tool to provide
information on states, needs or resources as well as to
avoid duplication of assistance efforts. He stated that the
goals of the meeting were to improve relationships between
donors and recipients and to promulgate a regional approach
to capacity building per UN Resolution 1373.


4. (U) CTED Section Chief Ahmed Seif El-Dawla argued that
sub-regional cooperation is imperative: if one state has

effective counter-terrorism measures and its neighbors do
not, terrorism will not be prevented but rather migrate to
neighboring countries, rendering the overall result of the
state,s counter-terrorism measures ineffectual. He also
noted that donor states are more encouraged to contribute
technical assistance when regions and sub-regions are stable,
and that stability helps counter-terrorism programs succeed.
Seif El-Dawla also stressed the importance of preventing
terrorist exploitation of domestic weaknesses. To that end,
he noted that while 1373 is beneficial, West African states
in particular still need help in order to effectively
implement compliance measures. He added that this need for
help is especially critical in light of other West African
concerns such as debt repayment and development.


5. (U) Seif El-Dawla described CTED,s two-prong approach to
fighting terrorism. The first prong involves facilitating
the exchange of information between donor and recipient
states within the framework of the 14 established categories
of technical assistance. The second prong involves promoting
the importance of the UN counter-terrorism strategy adopted
in September 2006 though capacity building and coordination
with 1373 efforts. He also outlined the most important areas
where donor states can provide technical assistance: drafting
and adopting legislation to implement international
conventions and protocols, strengthening financial laws and
practices like the ability to freeze terrorist funds,
funneling resources to law enforcement institutions,
improving border control lapses (especially where such lapses
amplify weapons smuggling and terrorist recruitment and
training),and encouraging submission of data so that donor
states can better target their resources.


6. (U) Representatives from Ghana, Benin, Burkina Faso,
Gambia, Guinea, Mali, Nigeria, Liberia, Sierra Leone,
Senegal, Cape Verde, and Togo made statements summarizing
their current counter-terrorism efforts and their outstanding
technical assistance needs. Most states expressed a
commitment to international cooperation, a willingness to
combat terrorism within their borders, and a desire to comply
with 1373 and other international counter-terrorism
conventions. However, states also noted a number of areas in
which they have had extreme difficulties that hinder their
efforts at compliance. Many common themes and problems
emerged.




LACK OF RESOURCES


7. (U) Almost every West African state reported an
inability to implement counter-terrorism conventions and
protocols because of a lack of all types of resources. Many
states noted the scarcity of financial resources. Many
states also mentioned their need for technical resources like
computers, detection equipment, and monitoring equipment.
Most states also complained of a lack of human resources on
many levels: they quantitatively lack personnel, and the
personnel they do have are also in acute need of training.
Areas in which training is most critically needed include
technology and computers, financial intelligence, and customs
and border control.



BORDER CONTROL


8. (U) Similarly, almost every state complained about a
number of border control problems. States reported these
types of problems at land borders as well as at ports.
States attributed a variety of problems to porous,
poorly-guarded borders: smuggling of small arms and light
weapons, and trafficking of drugs and humans. These states
requested many types of technical assistance to combat these
problems: more customs and border officials staff, enhanced
training for these types of staff members, financial aid, and
technical resources such as computers, airport x-ray
machines, and surveillance mechanisms.





SMALL ARMS AND LIGHT WEAPONS


9. (U) Some states also complained about the threat posed
by small arms and light weapons, and asked for help in
combating this problem. Mali noted problems in marking and
tracking these weapons, in large part because of its porous
borders. Sierra Leone similarly noted the ease with which
such weapons can be trafficked. Benin noted the adverse
effect of international organized crime on the presence of
small arms and light weapons within its borders.



OTHER ISSUES


10. (U) There were a number of other areas where states
requested help. Mali, Sierra Leone, and Cape Verde asked for
assistance in drafting and passing national legislation that
would strengthen domestic counter-terrorism measures and aid
compliance with international conventions. Benin, Guinea,
and Liberia noted the destabilizing effects of regional
fighting on their counter-terrorism efforts. Liberia also
expressed fears that former fighters may be recruited and
utilized by terrorist organizations because of their battle
experience and failure to be reintegrated into civil society.
Some states complained about weak domestic financial
institutions and the prevalence of money laundering within
their borders, and requested help in strengthening those
institutions to counteract these problems. Gambia asked for
aid in capacity building, and complained that previous
requests for help have gone unanswered. Benin noted its
difficulty in complying with UN resolution 1540 and asked for
help in the following areas: defining standards for compiling
passenger information and warnings, establishing minimum
standards for travel documents and biometric techniques,
defining minimum standards to verify the authenticity of
identification at borders, drafting legal instruments for
nuclear terrorism, and monitoring dual use instruments.
Nigeria expressed displeasure at defining technical
assistance in terms of &recipient8 and &donor8 states,
noting that there were areas in which countries that are
underdeveloped can nevertheless share their innovations with
other countries. Guinea noted the importance of addressing
the root causes of terrorism in the region such as poverty
and instability, and many West African states, recipient
states, and organizations echoed this sentiment.


11. (U) A number of donor states outlined the technical
assistance they have provided so far, and noted the areas in
which they can provide further help. The states that spoke
were Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, the United States,
Denmark, Egypt, Portugal, and Russia. The U.S. described its
assistance to the Trans-Sahara Counter-terrorism Partnership
(see para 17). Most states praised the regional and
sub-regional approach to technical assistance, and expressed


varying levels of ability to financially aid West African
states in combating terrorism. Germany, Italy, Japan, and
Egypt noted concerns about the effect of money laundering and
weak financial institutions within West Africa. Germany,
Spain, Japan, Denmark, and Egypt also expressed willingness
to help West African countries with capacity building, and
with drafting and implementing domestic legislation.


12. (U) Various international organizations explained the
ways in which they could aid West African states in their
counter-terrorism efforts. The organizations that presented
were the African Union, the European Commission,
Intergovernmental Action Group Against Money Laundering and
Terrorism Financing in West Africa (GIABA),the International
Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO),the International
Monetary Fund (IMF),Interpol, the United Nations Office on
Drugs and Crime (UNDOC),the UN Interregional Crime and
Justice Research Center (UNICRI),the Office of the UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights, and the International
Organization for Migration (IOM). The organizations
obviously vary in their areas of expertise and their
abilities to help West African states. However, most
organizations expressed willingness to use their capabilities
to work within the existing frameworks of the states and to
aid the states, efforts in implementing their policies.


13. (U) GIABA,s legal expert, Juliet Ume-Ezeoke Ibekaku,
gave a comprehensive presentation about GIABA,s efforts to
combat money laundering and terrorism financing. She noted
that while many West African states have instituted
anti-money laundering legislation, the legislation does not
incorporate the best and most efficient practices. In order
to improve the inadequate financial laws of these states and
to increase enforcement of these policies, GIABA provides
varying types of aid, from help with legislative drafting and
implementation to providing office and technical equipment to
the states to aiding states in conducting self-assessments.
However, Ibekaku noted that GIABA faces severe budgetary and
resource constraints. Its budget is $149,000, and it has
only 7 staff members. She concluded that these shortages
hinder GIABA,s effectiveness in helping West African states
counter money laundering and terrorist financing, especially
in light of the fact that many of the states often lack the
political will to pass or implement policies on their own.


14. (U) Seif Al-Dawla described CTED,s two tools of
technical assistance. The first tool is the matrix, which
gives snapshot information on recipient states, technical
assistance needs and dates when donor states offered help so
that potential providers can avoid duplicating aid efforts.
The second tool is the directory of assistance, which is an
up-to-date index of the ways in which donor states, the UN,
and international organizations can help states in need of
assistance. Robert Meyer, the Associate Information
Management Officer for CTED, gave a brief demonstration how
to use the directory. The representative from Senegal
inquired whether the directory would be in languages other
than English and noted potential problems in translating the
site from English. CTED responded that the first priority is
to complete the directory, and that once that is accomplished
they will ask that part of the budget be allocated to
updating the site in French. CTED also noted that member
states can contact CTED directly for clarification or help.
The representative from Sierra Leone asked whether the matrix
could be used in order to request assistance or whether it
was merely intended as a repository for information. CTED
responded that it can be used for both purposes, and that
CTED,s goal involves both consultation on and prioritization
of requests for help. Egypt,s representative asked whether
the matrix indicated what kinds of assistance have been
offered; in response, CTED only noted that the matrix
indicates the contact information of states. The IMF
representative wanted to know how CTED plans to manage the
matrix. CTED answered that states do not have to go through
CTED in order to request or receive assistance; they
encourage states to use CTED and at the very least to report
assistance efforts regardless of their source, but state are
not precluded from requesting help through the IMF.


15. (U) A number of states had comments and questions for
CTED. Burkina Faso expressed gratitude that the donor states
had listened and responded to the difficulties faced by West
African states, but criticized GIABA,s characterization of
West African political will and noted that GIABA itself was a
creation of West African states. Egypt asked for
clarification of CTED,s role in helping states prepare
reports for the matrix and wanted to know how CTED intends to
avoid duplication of aid efforts. Nigeria also inquired
about CTED,s efforts to avoid duplication in light of the
fact that there are a number of agencies and sub-regional
organizations that focus on counter-terrorism. Karev


responded that CTED avoids duplication by working in concert
with other UN agencies, and that given the varied functions
of the different agencies, duplication of efforts is largely
avoided. Lastly, Nigeria applauded Japan,s focus on root
causes of terrorism like poverty, and urged other states to
adopt a similar focus. Karev noted that while efforts to
combat root causes of terrorism are necessary, such activity
falls outside the scope of CTED,s mandate.


16. (U) Karev concluded the conference by highlighting
common themes and next steps. He characterized the meeting
as a success in publicizing the technical assistance needs of
West African states, something helpful for recipient states,
donor states, and organizations. He commented that since
most West African states have similar problems, multilateral
cooperation between both donors and recipients should be
considered a useful supplement to bilateral consultation and
aid. Karev ended the meeting by explaining CTED,s upcoming
plans to aid West African states, which involves drafting
work action plans that develop programs of common interest
for West African states and taking these plans to donors to
spur bilateral and multilateral cooperation.


17. (U) Drawing on material provided by the Department,
USUN made the following statement:
Begin text. I would like to thank CTED for convening
this very important meeting. A theme which pervades the
discussion of countering terrorism in the Security Council
and General Assembly is the need for international
cooperation. Unfortunately, we are all faced with the threat
of terrorism. We are in this together, and communication and
cooperation are absolutely essential. Against this backdrop,
the United States is encouraged by the response and quality
of participation today. In particular, we have noted the
preparation and participation of African states whose
representatives have seriously and with specificity outlined
their needs. We have listened and will endeavor to respond.

Let me mention what we are doing at present in this regard.
The United States and nine African countries created the
Trans-Sahara Counter-terrorism Partnership in 2005. The nine
African countries are Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Mauritania,
Senegal, Mali, Niger, Chad, and Nigeria. The U.S. supports
the partnership with resources and expertise from multiple
agencies in the U.S. federal government including the State
department, USAID, and the Department of Defense.

The partnership is a multi-faceted multi-year commitment
focused on improving individual country and regional
capabilities to defeat terrorist organizations, disrupt
efforts to recruit and train new terrorist fighters,
particularly from the young and rural poor, and counter
efforts to establish safe havens for domestic and outside
extremist groups.

Fiscal Year 2007 funding for this partnership is
approximately $143 million, and of this $143 million, $7.2
million was spent on specialized counter-terrorism assistance
training, including work with non-military units tasked with
prevention, response, and investigation of terrorist
activities (examples of this are border police, crime
investigators, and efforts in Ministries of the Interior).
This funding came from the State Department under the
Nonproliferation Anti-terrorism De-mining Reconstruction
account, and can be used to support programming for
non-military individuals and units engaged in specialized
counter-terrorism activities.

The United States wants you as our partners in combating
terrorism and will continue to work with you to this end.
Thank you. End text.

KHALILZAD