Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07USUNNEWYORK53
2007-01-24 17:01:00
UNCLASSIFIED
USUN New York
Cable title:  

UN CAPITAL MASTER PLAN: GENERAL ASSEMBLY APPROVES

Tags:  AORC UNGA KUNR 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0001
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUCNDT #0053/01 0241701
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 241701Z JAN 07
FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK
TO SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1182
UNCLAS USUN NEW YORK 000053 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AORC UNGA KUNR
SUBJECT: UN CAPITAL MASTER PLAN: GENERAL ASSEMBLY APPROVES
FINANCING PLAN AND BUDGET

REF: A. USUN 2116

B. SECSTATE 190201

C. USUN 2194

D. SECSTATE 193094

E. USUN 2228

F. SECSTATE 198796

UNCLAS USUN NEW YORK 000053

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AORC UNGA KUNR
SUBJECT: UN CAPITAL MASTER PLAN: GENERAL ASSEMBLY APPROVES
FINANCING PLAN AND BUDGET

REF: A. USUN 2116

B. SECSTATE 190201

C. USUN 2194

D. SECSTATE 193094

E. USUN 2228

F. SECSTATE 198796


1. SUMMARY: After several years of debate over how to
finance the project, during which time the cost has
significantly increased, the General Assembly (GA) decided
that Member States should be directly assessed for their
share of the total costs for the UN Capital Master Plan
(A/61/251). The General Assembly also approved a project
budget of $1,876.7 million, the establishment of a letter of
credit facility, and a $45 million working capital reserve
fund. The resolution includes U.S. language emphasizing the
importance of the project staying on schedule and within
budget and does not include language critical of the U.S. as
host country. Due to the late issuance of the
Secretary-General's report, the Fifth Committee did not have

SIPDIS
much time to consider the very technical issues related to
the financing of the project. However, since all delegations
desired to reach a conclusion on the topic during the main
session of the 61st UN General Assembly in order to allow the
project to move ahead without further delay, the Committee
worked through many important issues in a generally
cooperative spirit. Discussions principally focused on
issues related to the letter of credit and the amount of time
Member States would have to make payments. END SUMMARY.


2. The Fifth Committee made all the decisions requested by
the Secretary-General in his report, including approving a
project budget, deciding on a financing plan, agreeing to the
establishment of a letter of credit facility, and creating a
working capital reserve fund. At this stage, the General
Assembly has made all of the necessary decisions that are
required for the Capital Master Plan (CMP) to move forward.
It is now up to the Secretary-General to implement the
project and to ensure the work stays on schedule and within
budget. The GA will continue its oversight of the project
through yearly progress reports.


3. Pre-construction work will continue in 2007, with
construction expected to begin in early 2008. In order to
ensure that the Secretary-General has obligation authority
equal to expected expenditures in 2007, the GA approved an

additional appropriation of $42 million. In combination with
previous appropriations, this amount provides authority for
expected spending in 2007. The cash required to fund this
appropriation will come from the 2007 assessments of Member
States and does not represent an additional cost.


STAYING ON SCHEDULE AND WITHIN BUDGET
--------------


4. The GA approved a project budget of $1,876.7 million,
including additional scope options for security, redundancy
and sustainability. This budget level does not include any
fees associated with a letter of credit facility; those costs
will be assessed separately. The resolution includes
U.S.-initiated language that emphasizes the importance of
staying on schedule and within budget. The GA requested the
Secretary-General to make every effort to avoid budget

SIPDIS
increases through sound project management practices and to
ensure that the CMP is completed within the approved budget
and time schedules. There is also language emphasizing the
importance of effectively managing the multiple relocation of
staff that will be necessitated in order to keep the entire
project on schedule. Finally, noting that forward pricing
escalation is already included in the approved budget level,
the General Assembly requested the Secretary-General to
provide options on how to remain within the approved budget
level in the unlikely event the cost will exceed the approved
budget.


LETTER OF CREDIT
--------------


5. Members of the Group of 77 and China (G-77) were
particularly concerned about the letter of credit, and in
particular, possible drawdowns, especially if the normal
thirty-day rule applied for payments. (NOTE: The UN Financial
Rules and Regulations state that Member States have thirty
days from receipt of an assessment letter in which to make
their payments. Most Member States do not make their
payments in this time period, but there are no punitive
actions for not doing so. In the case of the CMP, those
Member States that do not make their payments in full and
within the prescribed payment period will be assessed a
portion of the interest charges incurred from a drawdown on
the letter of credit. END NOTE.) Based on these concerns,


the G-77 sought to defer a decision on the letter of credit
and make an exception to the thirty-day payment period for
CMP assessments, suggesting a 120-day period to make payments
and to be considered "on time." The EU, CANZ, and
Switzerland preferred the normal 30 days and resisted
attempts to lengthen the payment period. After being
provided clarifications from the Secretariat regarding the
need for the letter of credit (and the need for a decision on
it at the main session of the General Assembly),the G-77
agreed to move ahead with its establishment as part of a
larger deal that would include a longer payment period.


6. The resolution therefore allows the Secretary-General to
proceed with the establishment of a letter of credit as well
as with any drawdowns that may be necessary. In agreeing to
drawdowns, the GA also requested the Secretary-General to
advise Member States, as far in advance as possible, but
preferably ninety days in advance, if a drawdown was likely.
The GA also agreed to allow the Secretary-General to assess
Member States for their share of the interest charges related
to the drawdown, using the methodology proposed in his report
to determine each Member State's share. Only Member States
that have not paid their full assessment within the 120-day
payment period AND whose lack of payment caused the need for
a drawdown will be charged. Therefore, a Member State whose
payment is simply late, but does not cause a cash flow
problem, will not be charged. As instructed, USDel stated
that the U.S. could agree to this mechanism, but was
legislatively prohibited from paying interest charges should
the U.S. be so assessed. Only the EU commented on the U.S.
position. The UN will report on the status of negotiations
on the letter of credit in the next progress report, due in
the fall of 2007. This report will also update the GA on the
fees associated with the letter of credit and will request
authority to assess Member States for their share of the fees
for 2008.


ASSESSMENTS AND TIMING
--------------


7. The General Assembly agreed to give Member States the
option of paying their assessments for the project either
through a one-time payment or through five equal
installments. The default plan is the multi-year payment
plan, so if the one-time payment is chosen, the Member State
must notify the Secretariat of this decision within 60 days
of the issuance of the assessment in 2007. After an
additional 60 days (total of 120 days from the date of
assessment),this decision will be irrevocable. However, a
Member State that is on the multi-year payment plan can at
anytime choose to pay its outstanding remaining balance in
one payment, a point that was clarified in the formal meeting
by the Controller. The assessment rate is fixed at the 2007
scale as decided in December 2006 by the GA, even if a Member
State chooses to pay over five years. As stated above,
Member States are given 120 days from the date of assessment
to make their payments. If the full payment is received
during that time period, the Member State will be considered
to have paid on time. Assessments will be issued during the
first working week of January each year. The total to be
assessed to Member States is $1,716,700,000, the net amount
of the budget after taking into account appropriations to
date. For the U.S. this equals $377,674,000, for a one time
payment or five yearly payments of $74,534,800. Should the
budget ever increase over the approved level of $1,876.7
million, all Member States, regardless of the payment plan
chosen, will be required to fund their share of the
additional costs. However, the UN cannot go over the
authorized budget level without GA approval. The UN will earn
interest on the funds and each Member State will receive a
credit (at its 2007 assessment rate) at the end of the
construction period. Member States can apply this credit to
another assessment if they so choose.


WORKING CAPITAL RESERVE
--------------


8. In the event that the cash on hand does not cover
anticipated expenditures, the first source of additional cash
for the UN would be the working capital reserve fund. It is
set at $45 million and all Member States will be assessed in
2007 for a one-time contribution to the fund. The U.S. share
at 22 percent is $9.9 million.


OTHER ISSUES
--------------


9. In addition to the decisions noted above, there are a few
other issues that should be highlighted:


-- The Secretary-General is requested to have consultations
with the host country regarding possible ways the letter of
credit could be established without the imposition of fees or
charges to the United Nations. As instructed, USDel agreed
to the language but clarified that agreeing to have
consultations did not guarantee any particular outcome.

-- The resolution includes previously agreed language on
oversight and procurement, emphasizing the importance of
oversight and the need for procurement processes to be
conducted in a transparent manner. In addition, the GA
emphasized that contracts for the CMP should stipulate that
the UN will not be responsible for any delays, damage or loss
on the part of the contractor.

-- The Secretary-General is requested to ensure that gifts
and works of art are handled appropriately, and that related
costs are foreseen. According to the Secretariat, the CMP
budget includes funds to handle unmovable works of art, while
the Facilities Management office will request funding in the
context of the regular budget to deal with movable works of
art. In addition, those Member States that wish to take care
of their gifts may do so, but there is no obligation in this
regard.

-- Finally, concerning financing for the CMP, the GA made a
number of exceptions to the Financial Rules and Regulations
and other normal ways of dealing with financial issues. The
resolution clarifies that the CMP is unique and exceptional
and shall not be construed as setting a precedent for or
creating any permanent changes to the Financial Rules and
Regulations.


10. In addition to the statement made by the Controller
referenced in paragraph 7 above, the Controller made other
points, all at delegations' request, during the formal
meeting, prior to the adoption of the resolution. He
clarified the CMP schedule, stating that all work was to be
completed by 2014, and noted that contributions would be
considered as received once the physical check arrived in the
contributions service or the funds were electronically
transferred into the UN's account. He also stated that
Member States that pay their contribution in full within the
120 day period would not be at risk of being charged for any
interest incurred by the UN from a drawdown on the letter of
credit. He also explained again the methodology to be used
to apportion interest charges to Member States.


11. After the adoption of the resolution during a formal
meeting of the Fifth Committee, several delegations,
including USDel, made brief statements welcoming the adoption
of the resolution. In its statement, South Africa, on behalf
of the Group of 77 and China, noted that the original swing
space envisioned for the project was no longer available and,
bearing in mind host country responsibilities, hoped that
consultations with the host country would be productive.
Cuba stated that it was regrettable that the host country had
not offered an interest-free loan, especially given the
benefits received from the UN presence generally and from
this project in particular. Jamaica reiterated its interest
in having a permanent building on the North Lawn and asked
delegations to reconsider the planned demolition of the
temporary conference building.


12. USUN appreciates the Department's prompt responses to
requests for guidance, which helped ensure that USUN could
effectively pursue U.S. interests on this matter.

WOLFF