Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07USUNNEWYORK4
2007-01-05 16:28:00
SECRET
USUN New York
Cable title:  

MEETING AND DISCUSSION WITH UNDP ON DPRK:UNDP

Tags:  EAID KFPC KN KNNP KUNR PINR PREL UNDP 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0020
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUCNDT #0004/01 0051628
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
O 051628Z JAN 07
FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK
TO SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1086
S E C R E T USUN NEW YORK 000004 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/29/2016
TAGS: EAID KFPC KN KNNP KUNR PINR PREL UNDP
SUBJECT: MEETING AND DISCUSSION WITH UNDP ON DPRK:UNDP
DECLINES TO PROVIDE AUDITS ON DPRK/JAPANESE PROPOSAL TO
DEFER UNDP PROGRAM IN THE DPRK.

REF: A. STATE 183533 B. USUN 2273 C.STATE 2744

Classified By: Ambassador Jackie Wolcott Sanders
per reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)

S E C R E T USUN NEW YORK 000004

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/29/2016
TAGS: EAID KFPC KN KNNP KUNR PINR PREL UNDP
SUBJECT: MEETING AND DISCUSSION WITH UNDP ON DPRK:UNDP
DECLINES TO PROVIDE AUDITS ON DPRK/JAPANESE PROPOSAL TO
DEFER UNDP PROGRAM IN THE DPRK.

REF: A. STATE 183533 B. USUN 2273 C.STATE 2744

Classified By: Ambassador Jackie Wolcott Sanders
per reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)


1. This message contains an action request. See para. 19.

2.(S) Summary. Per reftels A and B, as a follow-up to the
demarche delivered to UNDP Administrator Kemal Dervis by
Ambassador Wallace on December 19, Ambassador Wallace and
USUN/MR Officers met with Mr. Dervis and a team of UNDP
officials on December 22 to provide a preliminary response to
the demarche. Ambassador Miller, USUN/ECOSOC, attended the
meeting as well. Mr. Dervis had stated his intention earlier
to gather information on the UNDP program budget and UNDP
internal audit policies. Mr. Dervis and his team claimed that
the program budget approved by the Executive Board for the
years 2001-2005 was $15 million and that the total number of
UNDP staff was 2 International Professional's. Total
expenditures for this allocated amount are $11.65 million, or
$2.3 million per year. Of this amount, Mr. Dervis claimed
that approximately $10 million went towards project
implementation while the remaining sums funded the UNDP
office. Mr. Dervis stated that internal audits are conducted
on a cyclical basis, with the last audit of the office in
DPRK occurring in 2004. Ambassador Wallace reiterated the
U.S. position that access to these internal audits is
essential to allaying U.S. concerns about the UNDP program in
the DPRK. Mr. Dervis reiterated the UNDP policy not to
disclose internal audits and promised to review UNDP policies
to determine if UNDP could share the audit with a Member
State. Notably, Mr. Dervis stated his intention to halt hard
currency transactions in the DPRK beginning in March 2007 and
to cease payment of salaries through the DPRK government and
to expand the scope of internal audits to include all
accounts administered by UNDP in the DPRK. He noted that the

DPRK would almost certainly object to these actions. USUN
will have discussions with Mr. Dervis during the first weeks
of January to follow-up on the previous meetings and obtain
additional responses to Ambassador Wallace's inquiries.
Comment: The information provided by Dervis was in certain
respects significantly different from information previously
supplied by UNDP or others. End Comment.

3.(S) In a follow-up letter sent to Mr. Dervis after the
meeting, Ambassador Wallace confirmed his requests for the
following information: internal and/or external audits of the
UNDP country office in the DPRK from the years 1998, 2001 and
2004; a line-by-line budget for the UNDP/DPRK Office of the
Resident Representative; UNDP written rules, procedures
and/or policies for waiving UN/UNDP restrictions on the use
of hard currency transactions for in-country expenditures;
confirmation that UNDP is taking action to preserve any and
all documents and materials related in any way to the UNDP
program in the DPRK from the last seven years.

4.(S) On January 4, 2007, Mr. Dervis returned Ambassador
Wallace's call and declined to provide UNDP internal audits
on DPRK, asserting UNDP's managerial prerogatives. End
Summary.

5.(S) Attending the meeting for UNDP were Kemal Dervis,
Administrator, Hafiz Pasha, Regional Director for the Asia
and Pacific Office, Darshak Shah, Finance Officer, Bruce
Jenks, Assistant Administrator for UNDP and Director of the
Bureau for Resources and Strategic Partnerships (BRSP),
Jessie Rose Mabutas, Director for Audit and Performance
Review (OAPR) and Douglas Keh, Special Adviser and Senior
Management Team Facilitator. There was no one present from
UNDP's legal support office or the Treasurer's Office.
Comment: Notably, the Assistant Administrator and Director
from the Bureau of Management who, as we understand,
supervises Mr. Shah and the Treasurer, Ms. Julie-Anne Mejia
as well as the legal support office was not present. Since
September of last year this position has been occupied by Ms.
Akiko Yuges, a Japanese national. End Comment.

6.(S) Mr. Dervis began the meeting by explaining that UNDP as
Resident Coordinator (RC),has convening authority, but no
line authority; asserting that UNDP has no signature
authority over funds of other offices and agencies. Mr.
Dervis stated that the total approved budget for the years
2001-2005, core and non-core, was $15 million of which, total
expenditures were $11.65 million, or $2.3 million per year.
Of this $11.65 million, Dervis claimed that approximately $10
million was used for implementation of projects and
approximately $1.35 went to the UNDP office. Comment: The
numbers provided during this meeting conflict significantly
with the numbers previously provided to USUN. USUN had been
told previously that the budget for the years 2001-2005 was
$19,009,056 and that the number of UNDP staff consisted of 4
international staff, 15 national staff and 4 project



managers. End Comment. Mr. Dervis further explained that of
the approximately $10 million used for UNDP projects, some
$6.2 million was implemented under National Execution
arrangements on behalf of the DPRK. Ambassador Wallace asked
if these payments were made directly to the DPRK Government.
The Controller, Darshak Shah, replied that in the DPRK, UNDP
is engaged in the "full-service" program, which means that
UNDP makes all procurements on behalf of the Government.
However, when queried by Ambassador Wallace, Mr. Dervis
conceded that there could be cases where payments are made
directly to DPRK entities. Even where payments in connection
with projects are made directly to the DPRK, Mr. Dervis
contended that such payments are subject to audit.

7.(S) USUN asked Mr. Dervis if there was any other funds of
other UN offices or agencies going through, managed or
facilitated by the UNDP Resident Coordinator. Mr. Dervis
stated that UNDP did not handle the funds of other UN
entities, except in regard to UNFPA. However, even in regard
to UNFPA, the Resident Coordinator reports directly to
UNFPA-not to UNDP.

8.(S) USUN was told that there are essentially two kinds of
transactions occurring in the DPRK. The first is the
electronic transfer of euros from a UNDP account outside of
the DPRK into the DPRK and the second is the disbursement of
hard currency in the form of cash or check within the DPRK.
The Controller maintained that it is UNDP's prerogative to
conduct hard currency transactions in euros within the DPRK.
When asked by Ambassador Wallace how electronic transfers to
the government and hard currency payments are monitored, the
Controller contended that any transfer of funds for the
implementation of projects are monitored by periodic internal
audits, however the hard currency that is given to the
government ministry to be distributed among staff for
salaries is unmonitored. Ambassador Wallace reiterated U.S.
concerns that hard currency funds should not be transferred
directly from UN programs to the DPRK government. Mr. Dervis
responded that this is why UNDP is ending hard currency
transactions in euros, even though it could result in
shutting down the UNDP office in the DPRK. In this respect,
Mr. Dervis stated his intention to halt hard currency
transactions in the DPRK beginning in March 2007. He added
that UNDP will cease to pay salaries through the DPRK
government; something that has already been done in China and
Vietnam.

9.(S) During the course of discussion, Mr. Dervis
acknowledged that UN policy dictates that hard currency
should not be used for local transactions. However, Mr.
Dervis stated that these restrictions can be waived by the
Administrator to allow the use of hard currency. Ambassador
Wallace asked if there was an administrative process whereby
this issue was determined. The Controller only stated that
the Executive Board "discussed the situation" in each Country
Office. Ambassador Wallace reiterated the importance of
understanding the process for waiving restrictions governing
hard currency transactions and requested that the written
rules, procedures and policies governing such a waiver
generally, as well as the documents reflecting the decision
to waive in regard to the DPRK, be provided to USUN as soon
as possible.

10.(S) In response to Ambassador Wallace's inquiries
regarding the counterfeiting of U.S. dollars, Mr. Shah and
Mr. Dervis replied that UNDP officers and officials had no
knowledge nor understanding of any counterfeiting of U.S.
dollars in the DPRK and denied that UNDP had received any
counterfeit U.S. dollars. They emphasized that they could not
vouch for individual UNDP personnel in the DPRK who may in
their personnel capacity possess dollars or counterfeit
dollars.

11.(S) Regarding counterfeiting, UNDP stated that it shifted
from dollars to euros in 2001 and closed its U.S. dollar
account in the DPRK in 2002. However, UNDP informed USUN that
dollars are still used to pay some UNDP employees
(international contractors) through the ATLAS system, which
enables UNDP to transfer dollars from UNDP dollar accounts
outside of the DPRK to private accounts also outside of DPRK.
UNDP stressed that these payments in U.S. dollars never occur
in-country in the DPRK, as there are no dollars available.
Mr. Dervis acknowledged that UNDP had no controls in place to
ensure that these dollar payments outside the DPRK were not
being made to agents of the DPRK.

12.(S) Regarding audits, USUN was told the Malaysia UNDP
regional office conducted the last internal audit of the DPRK
country office in 2004 and that this was a financial and
management audit. USUN was also informed that UNDP employed
Ernst and Young to assist in the audit, which gave a rating
of "partially satisfactory". In addition, there have been no



external audits of the UNDP program or country office in the
DPRK in 4 years. Mr. Dervis mentioned that he could have the
scope of the internal audits expanded to include all UN
program accounts administered by UNDP in the DPRK. However,
Mr. Dervis maintained that these actions require approval of
the DPRK government, which is unlikely. Mr. Dervis added that
UNDP on the other hand, could switch its method of
implementation entirely to direct implementation rather than
national execution to avoid any cooperation with the DPRK
government. Mr. Dervis maintained that if the DPRK government
failed to accept either of these changes, then the UNDP
program would cease. The representative from the Asia Office
stated that the subject of halting hard currency payments for
all local services has already been broached with the DPRK
Government and other UN agencies.

13.(S) Ambassador Wallace asked particularly given the
"partially satisfactory" rating, for a copy of the last
internal audit of the DPRK. The representative from the Asia
office stated that the rating was not based on a violation of
financial rules; it was due entirely to a human resource
issue i.e. the lack of competitive recruitment of staff
because all national staff in the DPRK are pre-selected
and/or directly provided by the DPRK government. Ambassador
Wallace indicated that such a circumstance was at least
partially the cause of U.S. concerns with the program. In
response to the request for access to the internal audits for
the DPRK, Mr. Dervis stated that he will ask other UN
agencies if they object to UNDP sharing the internal audit
with the understanding that it would be a one-time event.
Comment: This is a policy decision for UNDP, although they
would no doubt like support from such other UN agencies to
resist. End Comment. Ambassador Wallace stated that USUN
would need the last three audits in order to provide a
comparison. Ambassador Wallace added that the U.S. is not
sympathetic to UNDP's claims that internal audits should not
be shared, at least in this instance, due to the seriousness
of the allegations at hand. Mr. Dervis promised to review the
request for a copy of the audit and to provide a formal
response to Ambassador Wallace in the first week of January.

14.(S) Mr. Dervis indicated he has requested an audit at the
beginning of 2007. Ambassador Wallace asked whether the scope
of the audit would include all transactions in hard currency.
Mr. Dervis agreed to make such a request.

15.(S) Ambassador Wallace requested Mr. Dervis to take action
to ensure that all documents related in any way to the UNDP
program in the DPRK during the last seven years be preserved,
in accordance with UNDP's document retention policy.

16.(S) Mr. Dervis agreed to meet with USUN during the first
week of January to follow-up on the previous meetings and
obtain additional responses to Ambassador Wallace's inquiries.

17.(S) On January 4, 2007 Ambassador Wallace contacted Mr.
Dervis by phone. Mr. Dervis stated he had consulted with
other UN programs and that he had concluded UNDP would not
share with the U.S. copies of internal audits(s) of the DPRK.
Mr. Dervis said that such information was solely for the
managerial prerogatives of UNDP. Mr. Dervis also stated that
UNDP would attempt to provide other financial information to
allay U.S. concerns. Ambassador Wallace indicated that the
refusal to provide such audits appeared unsustainable given
the seriousness of the matter. Ambassador Wallace stated that
the UNDP/DPRK program was opaque at best and that:

1. UNDP had been and was continuing, at least in the
short term, with providing the DPRK regime with hard currency;

2. UNDP had provided inconsistent information to USUN
on the scope and nature of the DPRK program;

3. There is a lack of transparency of UNDP programmatic
activities in the DPRK, and;

4. The U.S. was a member of the UNDP Executive Board
and it was counter to any fiduciary principle, that a UNDP
Executive Board member should be denied a review of any audit
of UNDP.
Accordingly, Ambassador Wallace requested Mr. Dervis to
reconsider his refusal to provide the audit(s). Mr. Dervis
stated he would consider the request further. He promised to
provide other financial documents by January 5, 2007.

18.(S) Comment: USUN is of the view that considering the
apparent duplicity, inconsistent statements and lack of
transparency on the part of UNDP regarding the UNDP program
in the DPRK, that our delegation to the UNDP Executive Board
meeting January 23-26 be authorized to take whatever steps
are necessary to bring our concerns about both the UNDP DPRK
program and UNDP's lack of transparency and responsiveness to
the attention of the Board. End Comment.

19.(S) Action Request. Following Ambassador Wallace's meeting
with Mr. Dervis on December 22, Ambassador Wallace was



approached by Ambassador Kodera of the Japanese Mission who
inquired about the U.S. Government position in regard to a
Japanese proposal to defer (end in the interim) action on the
DPRK country program for 2007-2009. Ambassador Kodera
indicated that Japan sought to defer the program because of
serious concern regarding administration of the program and
possible violations of Security Council Resolution 1718. In
view of the information developed as a result of the
demarches to and meetings (reftel C) with UNDP over the last
several months, USUN proposes, as a first step, to join the
Japanese in seeking co-sponsors for deferral of the DPRK
country program. Irrespective of our success in that
endeavor, however, we believe that we should raise both the
DPRK program and UNDP's lack of transparency with the Board
under appropriate agenda items.
WOLFF