Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07TOKYO5482
2007-12-07 01:33:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Tokyo
Cable title:  

JAPANESE VIEW OF ANNAPOLIS, PARIS DONORS CONFERENCE

Tags:  PREL EAID XF WE IS GZ KWBG KPAL JA 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHKO #5482/01 3410133
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 070133Z DEC 07
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0097
INFO RUEHAS/AMEMBASSY ALGIERS PRIORITY 0203
RUEHAM/AMEMBASSY AMMAN PRIORITY 0333
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 0494
RUEHLB/AMEMBASSY BEIRUT PRIORITY 0275
RUEHEG/AMEMBASSY CAIRO PRIORITY 0292
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 2462
RUEHDM/AMEMBASSY DAMASCUS PRIORITY 0492
RUEHKU/AMEMBASSY KUWAIT PRIORITY 0355
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 1896
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 1986
RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO PRIORITY 1162
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 5862
RUEHRB/AMEMBASSY RABAT PRIORITY 0307
RUEHRH/AMEMBASSY RIYADH PRIORITY 0554
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL PRIORITY 6549
RUEHTV/AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV PRIORITY 0728
RUEHTU/AMEMBASSY TUNIS PRIORITY 0270
RUEHJM/AMCONSUL JERUSALEM PRIORITY 0356
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/CJCS WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/USFJ PRIORITY
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 7301
C O N F I D E N T I A L TOKYO 005482 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT PASS TO NEA/IPA FOR BELGRADE, EEB/IFD/ODF FOR
DEMARCELLUS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/04/2017
TAGS: PREL EAID XF WE IS GZ KWBG KPAL JA
SUBJECT: JAPANESE VIEW OF ANNAPOLIS, PARIS DONORS CONFERENCE

REF: A. STATE 163377

B. STATE 163955

Classified By: Ambassador J. T. Schieffer for reasons 1.4(b) and (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L TOKYO 005482

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT PASS TO NEA/IPA FOR BELGRADE, EEB/IFD/ODF FOR
DEMARCELLUS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/04/2017
TAGS: PREL EAID XF WE IS GZ KWBG KPAL JA
SUBJECT: JAPANESE VIEW OF ANNAPOLIS, PARIS DONORS CONFERENCE

REF: A. STATE 163377

B. STATE 163955

Classified By: Ambassador J. T. Schieffer for reasons 1.4(b) and (d)


1. (C) SUMMARY: Japan considers the Annapolis Conference a
great success, terming it an "historic opportunity" to
advance the Peace Process. Unfortunately, Japan was not
represented at the ministerial level. Separately, given
budgetary constraints, the issue of whether Japan can
contribute to the Palestinians at the December 17 donors
conference is not yet determined. Officials in the Middle
East and African Affairs Bureau at MOFA realize that if Japan
is to be taken seriously, it must attend critical meetings at
the ministerial level and make contributions when needed.
Unfortunately, the Diet schedule - particularly during these
politically tumultuous times - and budgetary realities
interfere. END SUMMARY.

--------------
ANNAPOLIS CONFERENCE
--------------


2. (C) Japan considered the November 26-27 Annapolis
Conference a great success due to the achievement of the
Joint Understanding and to the large turnout, particularly
that of the Saudis and Syrians, according to a December 5
readout by Akihiro Tsuji, Principal Deputy Director of MOFA's
First Middle East Division. In a statement issued November
28, Foreign Minister Masihiko Koumura called the conference
an "historic opportunity" and paid "the highest tribute to
the initiative of President George W. Bush" in hosting the
meeting and in obtaining the Joint Understanding.


3. (C) Tsuji said efforts had been made to have FM Koumura
attend, but in the end this was not possible due to the Diet
schedule. He acknowledged that the Prime Minister's office
was concerned after the fact about the lack of ministerial
representation, confiding to Embassy Tokyo Political Officer
that following the conference, Chief Cabinet Secretary
Machimura called in Vice Minister Shotaro Yachi to ask why
Koumura had not attended. Tsuji also revealed that Ambassador

Tatsuo Arima, Japan's Special Envoy for Middle East Peace -
who led Japan's delegation to Annapolis - has yet to have an
opportunity to brief FM Koumura on the conference. Tsuji
said he hopes Arima will get in to see Koumura on December 6
but didn't sound convinced this would happen.

--------------
PARIS DONORS CONFERENCE
--------------


4. (C) With regard to the upcoming December 17 Paris Donors
conference, Shinsuke Sugiyama, Deputy Director General of
MOFA's Middle Eastern and African Affairs Bureau, will
represent Japan at the December 7 preparatory meeting. Tsuji
said there is currently a debate raging within MOFA about
whether Japan will be in a position to make additional
financial contributions to the Palestinians. The Middle East
and African Affairs Bureau is strongly advocating on behalf
of making additional contributions, and Arima will also push
this position when he sees FM Koumura. But the Economic
Cooperation Bureau is pushing back, taking the position that
Japan's current financial situation will not allow it to make

additional funds available.


5. (C) Even if the Middle East Bureau's position wins out,
MOFA will still have to convince the Ministry of Finance to
make funds available, and with less than two weeks remaining
before the conference, time is running out. Tsuji termed the
whole situation very frustrating. He pointed out that Japan
counts itself as the second largest bilateral donor to the
Palestinians, having contributed nearly USD 1 billion since

1993. He acknowledged, however, that if Japan wants to be
considered a "serious player" in the Peace Process, it needs
to attend key meetings at the ministerial level and make
contributions when critically needed. Embassy Tokyo will
present a demarche on the December 17 donors conference per
ref B and will report outcome septel.

--------------
JAPAN AND THE PEACE PROCESS
--------------


6. (C) The three pillars of Japan's approach to the peace
process, explained Tsuji, are to 1) encourage political
dialogue between Israel and the Palestinians and other Arab
neighbors, 2) provide economic assistance to the
Palestinians, and 3) facilitate confidence building measures
between the parties. Japan's Corridor for Peace and
Prosperity (CPP) initiative represents efforts in the
economic and confidence building realms. Tsuji said a very
successful expert-level CPP meeting had taken place on
December 3 in which officials from Israel, Palestine, Jordan
and Japan drove around the West Bank together in a single
mini-bus touring the site identified for the construction of
the initiative's agro-industrial park.


7. (C) Getting back to the Annapolis Conference, Tsuji
wondered what role the people in Gaza would play in the
unfolding process, expressing his opinion that a final peace
settlement cannot be reached without them. Embassy Tokyo
Political Officer assured him the U.S. will not abandon the
people of Gaza. Providing assistance to the Palestinian
Authority so it can increase its capacity to govern and
provide security is critical to restoring the confidence of
the Gazans in President Abbas and Prime Minister Fayyad.
Once this is accomplished, it is hoped the people of Gaza
will see clearly that a brighter future of peace and
prosperity lies with supporting those who support a peaceful
settlement, rather than those who espouse violent resistance
and practice acts of terror.

--------------
COMMENT
--------------


8. (C) Tsuji seemed embarrassed by the fact that Japan was
not represented at Annapolis at the ministerial level. Japan
says it wants to play a major role in the Peace Process and
often complains that it is not adequately consulted. Yet
according to ref A, of the 45 countries in attendance, Japan
was one of only two not represented at the ministerial level,
the other being Sudan. Hopefully, they will make a better
showing at Paris, although we judge it as doubtful Japan will
make much in the way of a financial contribution, citing
tough financial times and the fact that they made a USD 20
million contribution to the Palestinians last August. We
will report the outcome of our demarche on the need for Japan
to attend the Paris meeting at the ministerial level and to
make a significant contribution. END COMMENT.
SCHIEFFER