Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07THEHAGUE849
2007-05-04 15:12:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy The Hague
Cable title:
NETHERLANDS/HRC: BELARUS CANDIDACY
how-toVZCZCXRO5917 PP RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR DE RUEHTC #0849 1241512 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 041512Z MAY 07 FM AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9065 INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE RUEHGO/AMEMBASSY RANGOON 0113 RUEHNT/AMEMBASSY TASHKENT 0110 RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE 0430 RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 1380 RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 4265
C O N F I D E N T I A L THE HAGUE 000849
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR IO/RHS, DRL/MLGA, EUR/PGI
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/04/2017
TAGS: PHUM PREL UNHRC NL
SUBJECT: NETHERLANDS/HRC: BELARUS CANDIDACY
REF: STATE 58036
Classified By: Political Counselor Andrew Schofer; reasons 1.4 (b and d
).
C O N F I D E N T I A L THE HAGUE 000849
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR IO/RHS, DRL/MLGA, EUR/PGI
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/04/2017
TAGS: PHUM PREL UNHRC NL
SUBJECT: NETHERLANDS/HRC: BELARUS CANDIDACY
REF: STATE 58036
Classified By: Political Counselor Andrew Schofer; reasons 1.4 (b and d
).
1. (U) Poloff delivered reftel demarche May 4 to Peter van
der Vliet, Head of the Political and Legal Affairs Division,
UN and IFIs Department, Dutch MFA.
2. (C) Van der Vliet stated that the Netherlands is fully
occupied with its own campaign for re-election to the HRC and
is wary of campaigning either openly or quietly against any
other country. The Netherlands, he said, is in a tight race
with Italy and Denmark and cannot afford to alienate
potential voters. Van der Vliet justified the Dutch position
by saying that the Netherlands believed it was preferable to
ensure that strong human rights supporters ensured their own
seats first. (Comment: a rather odd assertion, given that
none of the countries running from the WEOG could be
considered anything but observant of human rights. End
comment.)
3. (C) While the Netherlands would not, he said, vote for
Belarus and fully opposed the Belarussian candidacy, it
preferred to go no further than the joint EU statement on the
matter. Van der Vliet repeated the Dutch position that the
Netherlands will not vote for any serious human rights
abuser, whether Belarus, Iran, North Korea, or another. Nor
will it make deals with any of these countries. He said that
the Netherlands believed Italy had made a deal with Belarus,
and he invited poloff to pass this observation to Washington.
4. (C) On a possible third country candidate for the eastern
group, van der Vliet expressed concern that such candidate
might wait too long to enter the race. He suggested Bosnia
was willing - obviously not a secret in The Hague - and said
he did not believe Slovenia would pull out of the race should
the Bosnians enter. He ruled out Dutch campaigning for
either Slovenia or Bosnia.
5. (C) Comment: The Dutch MFA is narrowly focused on
re-election to the HRC. Reversing this counterproductive
stance will require concerted pressure from other EU members
and probably some EU horse trading. End comment.
ARNALL
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR IO/RHS, DRL/MLGA, EUR/PGI
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/04/2017
TAGS: PHUM PREL UNHRC NL
SUBJECT: NETHERLANDS/HRC: BELARUS CANDIDACY
REF: STATE 58036
Classified By: Political Counselor Andrew Schofer; reasons 1.4 (b and d
).
1. (U) Poloff delivered reftel demarche May 4 to Peter van
der Vliet, Head of the Political and Legal Affairs Division,
UN and IFIs Department, Dutch MFA.
2. (C) Van der Vliet stated that the Netherlands is fully
occupied with its own campaign for re-election to the HRC and
is wary of campaigning either openly or quietly against any
other country. The Netherlands, he said, is in a tight race
with Italy and Denmark and cannot afford to alienate
potential voters. Van der Vliet justified the Dutch position
by saying that the Netherlands believed it was preferable to
ensure that strong human rights supporters ensured their own
seats first. (Comment: a rather odd assertion, given that
none of the countries running from the WEOG could be
considered anything but observant of human rights. End
comment.)
3. (C) While the Netherlands would not, he said, vote for
Belarus and fully opposed the Belarussian candidacy, it
preferred to go no further than the joint EU statement on the
matter. Van der Vliet repeated the Dutch position that the
Netherlands will not vote for any serious human rights
abuser, whether Belarus, Iran, North Korea, or another. Nor
will it make deals with any of these countries. He said that
the Netherlands believed Italy had made a deal with Belarus,
and he invited poloff to pass this observation to Washington.
4. (C) On a possible third country candidate for the eastern
group, van der Vliet expressed concern that such candidate
might wait too long to enter the race. He suggested Bosnia
was willing - obviously not a secret in The Hague - and said
he did not believe Slovenia would pull out of the race should
the Bosnians enter. He ruled out Dutch campaigning for
either Slovenia or Bosnia.
5. (C) Comment: The Dutch MFA is narrowly focused on
re-election to the HRC. Reversing this counterproductive
stance will require concerted pressure from other EU members
and probably some EU horse trading. End comment.
ARNALL