Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07THEHAGUE1421
2007-07-30 10:09:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy The Hague
Cable title:  

CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION (CWC): WRAP-UP FOR THE

Tags:  PARM PREL CWC 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHTC #1421/01 2111009
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 301009Z JUL 07
FM AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9913
INFO RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS THE HAGUE 001421 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

STATE FOR ISN/CB, VCI/CCB, L/ACV, IO/S
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISP
JOINT STAFF FOR DD PMA-A FOR WTC
COMMERCE FOR BIS (GOLDMAN)
NSC FOR LEDDY
WINPAC FOR WALTER

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM PREL CWC
SUBJECT: CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION (CWC): WRAP-UP FOR THE
PERIOD JULY 16-27

This is CWC-68-07.

--------------------------------------------- ----------
INSPECTION ISSUES - SEQUENTIALS AND SAMPLING & ANALYSIS
--------------------------------------------- ----------

UNCLAS THE HAGUE 001421

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

STATE FOR ISN/CB, VCI/CCB, L/ACV, IO/S
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISP
JOINT STAFF FOR DD PMA-A FOR WTC
COMMERCE FOR BIS (GOLDMAN)
NSC FOR LEDDY
WINPAC FOR WALTER

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM PREL CWC
SUBJECT: CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION (CWC): WRAP-UP FOR THE
PERIOD JULY 16-27

This is CWC-68-07.

-------------- --------------
INSPECTION ISSUES - SEQUENTIALS AND SAMPLING & ANALYSIS
-------------- --------------


1. (U) On July 23, del rep met with Bill Kane (Head, Industry
Verification, Technical Secretariat) and Jorge Bernal Ramirez
(IVB),who works closely with the TS mission planners.


2. (U) The first topic was lessons learned from the recent
sequential inspections that were held at a Schedule 3 and a
UDOC plant sites in Ohio. The following issues were
addressed:


3. (U) First, at the commencement of these inspections, the
inspection team leader (ITL) insisted on presenting the
mandates for both inspection sites at the time of the
equipment inspection (TEI) in Washington. This did not raise
a real issue, as the host team facilitated the arrival of the
inspection in the "vicinity" of both inspection sites upon
arrival in Ohio, as the sites were located close together.
The discussion was how this might be handled if the sites
were further apart (e.g., up to the 150-mile limit allowed
under the U.S. consent to host sequential inspections). Kane
admitted that this was addressed specifically before with any
other States Party. He committed to exploring this further
with his staff and letting us know their thoughts.


4. (U) Second, although this was not an issue during these
inspections, the host team wondered if it would be preferable
for the ITL to carry the sealed mandate and other items for
the second inspection site with him at least through airport
security when traveling from the POE to the vicinity of the
sites. This would allow the ITL to oversee any need for TSA
personnel to open the sealed envelope for security reasons.
Kane thought this was a good recommendation and committed to
discussing this further with his staff.


5. (U) Finally, Kane also said that sequential inspections
were again on the TS radar. Kane made a similar statement to
del rep a month or two before the July sequential inspections

occurred.


6. (U) The possible timing of the anticipated Schedule 2
inspection involving sampling and analysis (S&A) was
discussed briefly. Although del rep was not requesting
specific information about the timing of this event, he did
bring to the attention of the TS representatives coordination
concerns that were recently identified - that the Edgewood
mobile laboratory staff who would support an S&A event (i.e.,
provide the needed portable fume hood) include staff who
would also be involved in the October proficiency test
activities for the designated laboratory. Kane was able to
clarify the following:

-- The proficiency test activities would occur during the
weeks of October 8 and 15.

-- They would work to ensure that there is no conflict.

-- He asked whether an S&A inspection during either the week
immediately prior to or immediately after could be supported,
which del rep confirmed. Given that there have been rumors
that this S&A inspection might occur in October, Kane may
have given us two specific windows to focus on with this
question.

--------------
INDUSTRY CLUSTER - LATE DECLARATIONS
--------------


7. (U) As a result of the July 10 consultation on this issue,
the facilitator (Larry Denyer, U.S.) has worked with the TS,
ISN/CB, and Commerce/TCD to revise the previous facilitator's
draft decision to incorporate the strong opinions expressed
by delegations and to try to preserve as much of the heart of
the decision as possible, with a view to returning to the
possibility of additional measures (including "nil"

declarations) in the future.


8. (U) Given that some of the greatest concern about the
previous draft (along with suggestions for modifying it) came
from theSouth African delegation, the facilitator met with
the South African delegate to discuss the propose changes.
The result was very positive. The Souh African delegate
even went so far as to offer is assistance, if needed, in
brokering an agreemnt with some of the interesed (and
difficult) SPs within his regional group and the NAM - i.e.,
Iran, India, etc.


9. (U) The latest draft has now been forwarded to the TS for
their distribution to delegations and posting on the external
server. This will give delegations nearly six weeks to
consult with their capitals in advance of the September
Industry Cluster meetings. The facilitator will continue to
meet with interested delegations in the intervening period to
try to make progress toward a decision at EC-50.


10. (U) Ito sends.
GALLAGHER