Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07TASHKENT793
2007-04-17 11:04:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Tashkent
Cable title:
EMBASSY TASHKENT COMMENTS ON OSCE BORDER
how-toVZCZCXRO7972 PP RUEHDBU DE RUEHNT #0793 1071104 ZNR UUUUU ZZH P 171104Z APR 07 FM AMEMBASSY TASHKENT TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 7720 INFO RUEHAH/AMEMBASSY ASHGABAT PRIORITY 2994 RUEHTA/AMEMBASSY ASTANA PRIORITY 9106 RUEHEK/AMEMBASSY BISHKEK PRIORITY 3592 RUEHDBU/AMEMBASSY DUSHANBE PRIORITY 3461 RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL PRIORITY 1861 RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE PRIORITY 1972
UNCLAS TASHKENT 000793
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR SCA/CEN AND EUR/RPM
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PBTS OSCE UZ
SUBJECT: EMBASSY TASHKENT COMMENTS ON OSCE BORDER
ASSESSMENT OF CENTRAL ASIAN STATES
REF: A. USOSCE 00154
B. ALLEN-SCOTT 3/14/07 EMAIL
UNCLAS TASHKENT 000793
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR SCA/CEN AND EUR/RPM
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PBTS OSCE UZ
SUBJECT: EMBASSY TASHKENT COMMENTS ON OSCE BORDER
ASSESSMENT OF CENTRAL ASIAN STATES
REF: A. USOSCE 00154
B. ALLEN-SCOTT 3/14/07 EMAIL
1. Enhancing Uzbekistan's capabilities to control its borders
and interdict the illicit movement of people, narcotics, and
weapons of mass destruction-related items is one of Post's
highest priorities. Border security also remains an area in
which the Government of Uzbekistan appears willing to accept,
albeit on its own very restrictive terms, continued U.S.
engagement. To date, most international assistance has been
focused on the lone land border crossing between Uzbekistan
and Afghanistan at the Friendship Bridge. Such assistance
has resulted in the creation of a Port of Entry generally
considered to be among the most modern border posts in
Central Asia. In our view, the work at this border crossing
is largely done; additional attention may be warranted at
nearby rail and river ports.
2. Post welcomes increased OSCE attention to the border
situation in Uzbekistan and other Central Asian states.
However, we note that there have been many different border
assessments conducted over the years and recommend strongly
that the OSCE study not replicate what has already been done.
From our perspective, it would be more useful to use the
OSCE assessment to get a clear picture of what has already
been done and what gaps remain to be filled to implement
recommendations from earlier border assessments. In
particular, Post hopes that the OSCE assessment will focus
heavily on whether Uzbekistan and other Central Asian states
have made use of previous assistance by effectively
integrating equipment provided into daily border operations
and by institutionalizing training in their border service
academies. From our perspective, it also would be useful to
obtain a better understanding of the relationships between
Uzbek border services and those of neighboring countries, and
identifying obstacles to greater cooperation. Finally, we
need to be more proactive in getting Uzbekistan and its
neighbors to do more to deter the shipment of narcotics
precursor chemicals to Afghanistan, including through
targeted training and providing specialized equipment as
appropriate.
PURNELL
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR SCA/CEN AND EUR/RPM
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PBTS OSCE UZ
SUBJECT: EMBASSY TASHKENT COMMENTS ON OSCE BORDER
ASSESSMENT OF CENTRAL ASIAN STATES
REF: A. USOSCE 00154
B. ALLEN-SCOTT 3/14/07 EMAIL
1. Enhancing Uzbekistan's capabilities to control its borders
and interdict the illicit movement of people, narcotics, and
weapons of mass destruction-related items is one of Post's
highest priorities. Border security also remains an area in
which the Government of Uzbekistan appears willing to accept,
albeit on its own very restrictive terms, continued U.S.
engagement. To date, most international assistance has been
focused on the lone land border crossing between Uzbekistan
and Afghanistan at the Friendship Bridge. Such assistance
has resulted in the creation of a Port of Entry generally
considered to be among the most modern border posts in
Central Asia. In our view, the work at this border crossing
is largely done; additional attention may be warranted at
nearby rail and river ports.
2. Post welcomes increased OSCE attention to the border
situation in Uzbekistan and other Central Asian states.
However, we note that there have been many different border
assessments conducted over the years and recommend strongly
that the OSCE study not replicate what has already been done.
From our perspective, it would be more useful to use the
OSCE assessment to get a clear picture of what has already
been done and what gaps remain to be filled to implement
recommendations from earlier border assessments. In
particular, Post hopes that the OSCE assessment will focus
heavily on whether Uzbekistan and other Central Asian states
have made use of previous assistance by effectively
integrating equipment provided into daily border operations
and by institutionalizing training in their border service
academies. From our perspective, it also would be useful to
obtain a better understanding of the relationships between
Uzbek border services and those of neighboring countries, and
identifying obstacles to greater cooperation. Finally, we
need to be more proactive in getting Uzbekistan and its
neighbors to do more to deter the shipment of narcotics
precursor chemicals to Afghanistan, including through
targeted training and providing specialized equipment as
appropriate.
PURNELL