Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07TASHKENT2163
2007-12-26 12:58:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Tashkent
Cable title:  

UZBEKS AIM TO DEMONSTRATE TANGIBLE PROGRESS ON

Tags:  PHUM PGOV PREL UZ 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0001
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHNT #2163/01 3601258
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 261258Z DEC 07
FM AMEMBASSY TASHKENT
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8955
INFO RUEHAH/AMEMBASSY ASHGABAT 3558
RUEHTA/AMEMBASSY ASTANA 9771
RUEHEK/AMEMBASSY BISHKEK 4174
RUEHDBU/AMEMBASSY DUSHANBE 0050
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0052
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO 1696
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0910
RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE 2203
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L TASHKENT 002163 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/26/2017
TAGS: PHUM PGOV PREL UZ
SUBJECT: UZBEKS AIM TO DEMONSTRATE TANGIBLE PROGRESS ON
HUMAN RIGHTS

REF: TASHKENT 2018

Classified By: Poloff Tim Buckley for reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L TASHKENT 002163

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/26/2017
TAGS: PHUM PGOV PREL UZ
SUBJECT: UZBEKS AIM TO DEMONSTRATE TANGIBLE PROGRESS ON
HUMAN RIGHTS

REF: TASHKENT 2018

Classified By: Poloff Tim Buckley for reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)


1. (C) Summary: Ambassador met with Deputy Foreign Minister
Nematov on December 21 to review the status of foreign
operations legislation in Congress that includes language on
Uzbekistan. Nematov appreciated the update and noted that
Uzbek Ambassador Kamilov has kept MFA well-informed about
policy developments in Washington. The GOU believes the
legislation could have been much worse from its perspective
and understands that there is a six-month period before
potential visa restrictions enter into force. The Ambassador
emphasized that it will be important to demonstrate progress
on human rights in this timeframe, and specific opportunities
include establishing a substantive prison visit program with
ICRC, a public decree against torture by President Karimov,
releasing religious and/or political prisoners in the GOU's
traditional amnesty, and facilitating activities of local or
international NGOs in Uzbekistan. Nematov said the GOU "is
prepared to continue cooperation on a permanent basis." The
GOU's calm reaction to the legislation -- which by no means
lets it off the hook -- confirms that a foundation exists for
an intensified bilateral dialogue on human rights that needs
to bear results. The hard part comes now in trying to get
there. End summary.

GOU Well-Informed
--------------


2. (C) The Ambassador met on December 21 with Nematov to
discuss the latest developments in the foreign operations
legislation in Washington, which in the version sent to the
President includes visa restrictions on GOU officials who
were involved in Andijon but provides for a waiver at the
discretion of the Secretary of State. The Ambassador noted
that, significantly, the legislation does not include
financial sanctions and provides for a six-month window
before visa restrictions enter into force. Nematov listened
patiently before noting that Uzbek Ambassador Kamilov had
already informed MFA about these developments, including
analysis that the final language had been scaled back.
(Note: Nematov was in a good mood at this meeting and at a

reception the evening of December 20, in contrast to our
meeting one month ago when he learned about the possible
sanctions and visa bans. End note.)

Menu of Actions
--------------


3. (C) The Ambassador stressed that the GOU faces a major
opportunity -- and also pressure -- to demonstrate tangible
progress on human rights during the next six months before a
visa ban enters into force. The menu of possible actions
which would send a positive message to the international
community includes: establishing a substantive prison visit
program with the ICRC (including accepting its demand to take
its recommendations seriously); following up on President
Karimov's expressed willingness during his November 20
meeting with the Ambassador (reftel) to issue a decree
stipulating zero-tolerance for torture among GOU officials;
releasing political and/or religious prisoners in the GOU's
traditional annual amnesty; and improving support for local
NGOs as well as inviting international NGOs such as Human
Rights Watch to resume operations in Uzbekistan. The
Ambassador also mentioned that this would in turn facilitate
more extensive cooperation in other spheres, such as
military-to-military relations.

"We Are Ready"
--------------


4. (C) Nematov's reaction was very calm, and he stated that
the GOU "is prepared to continue cooperation on a permanent
basis." He continued "we are ready" to conduct negotiations
on these issues, specifically citing the GOU's repeated
invitations dating to May 4 to the ICRC to resume prison
visits immediately. (Note: This is true; however ICRC wants
a more thorough commitment from the GOU to follow up on its
previous recommendations. Reftel. End note.) Nematov

asserted that the ball is in ICRC's court and that "they are
absolutely unobjective" and "follow a political standard."
Nematov also pointed to Uzbekistan's recent abolition of the
death penalty as an example of its commitment to human rights.

Comment
--------------


5. (C) President Karimov had informed the Ambassador on
November 20 that sanctions of any sort would lead to a crisis
in U.S. - Uzbek relations. Nematov's calm reaction suggests
that the GOU is keenly aware that the final language in the
legislation is not as harsh as it initially feared. It
perhaps also understands the need to deliver tangible
progress as soon as possible in order to make the case that
the visa ban should be cancelled altogether. Its proactive
efforts to restart ICRC prison visits, regardless of how much
it is willing to compromise on the substance, are at least an
indication it recognizes a sense of urgency. The GOU also
senses an opportunity to build on the recently re-established
foundation of positive steps to cement better ties with the
West as an antidote to growing Russian influence. With
President Karimov's election on December 23, as expected
(septel),the stage is now set for intensified bilateral
efforts to achieve progress on human rights. However, we are
under no illusion this will be easy, and we will be
consulting with the Department and the human rights community
to devise the most effective strategy.

NORLAND