Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07TASHKENT2000
2007-11-20 10:53:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Tashkent
Cable title:  

PRESIDENTIAL APPARAT WAITING FOR U.S. RESPONSE TO

Tags:  PREL PGOV PINR UZ 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1128
RR RUEHDBU
DE RUEHNT #2000/01 3241053
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 201053Z NOV 07
FM AMEMBASSY TASHKENT
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8795
INFO RUEHAH/AMEMBASSY ASHGABAT 3466
RUEHTA/AMEMBASSY ASTANA 9676
RUEHEK/AMEMBASSY BISHKEK 4082
RUEHDBU/AMEMBASSY DUSHANBE 3945
RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE 2145
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TASHKENT 002000 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR SCA/CEN BRIAN RORAFF, EUR/ACE RICK STODDARD

E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/20/2017
TAGS: PREL PGOV PINR UZ
SUBJECT: PRESIDENTIAL APPARAT WAITING FOR U.S. RESPONSE TO
"SIGNALS"


Classified By: Poloff Tim Buckley for reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TASHKENT 002000

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR SCA/CEN BRIAN RORAFF, EUR/ACE RICK STODDARD

E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/20/2017
TAGS: PREL PGOV PINR UZ
SUBJECT: PRESIDENTIAL APPARAT WAITING FOR U.S. RESPONSE TO
"SIGNALS"


Classified By: Poloff Tim Buckley for reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)


1. (C) Summary. Visiting AmCit National Democratic Institute
(NDI) Senior Program Director for Eurasia was approached on
the margins of a civil society conference on November 15 by a
member of the GOU Presidential Apparat. The woman asked why
the USG has not responded to the recent "signals" put forth
by the GOU about greater engagement. She also inquired about
how much emphasis the USG was placing on human rights issues
as a condition for reengagement, particularly regarding
Andijon. This rather odd approach to NDI may suggest that
the Uzbeks want to confirm that we're getting their subtle
hints about some project areas, but they want the USG to make
the visible overtures. The GOU remains concerned about the
USG reaction to elections and whether human rights concerns
will hold up other aspects of the relationship which it
gradually wants to develop. It would be surprising if the
GOU were looking for overtures prior to elections, especially
after recently denying key contractors accreditation to
facilitate the completion of the portal monitor border
security project. But such mixed signals might suggest
internal division within the Apparat between those seeking
closer ties and those protecting entrenched interests. End
summary.

Criticism of US Foreign Policy at Conference
--------------


2. (C) Poloff attended an evening reception after the first
day of a two-day conference entitled "Democratic Development:
Security, Human Rights, Cooperation for the Future." The
conference is jointly sponsored by OSCE, NDI, and the
Uzbekistan-based Foundation of Regional Policy. There were
many lively discussions, and visiting participants bemoaned
attacks on US foreign policy, particularly by pro-Russian
speakers and participants. However, the AmCit NDI Country
Director pointed out that "although these conferences can be
talk shops, the GOU still allows foreign participants to
attend whom they know will speak their minds." NDI continues
to plan three or four such conferences per year in
Uzbekistan, and they are confident the GOU is comfortable
with the format. (Comment: Embassy shares the view that on
balance these conferences are very worthwhile, affording some
of the only venues in Uzbekistan for formal and informal
dialogue on sensitive political issues. End comment.)

Apparat Approaches Visiting NDI Official
--------------


3. (C) The AmCit NDI Senior Program Director for Eurasia was
approached on the margins of the conference on November 15 by
a woman who identified herself as working in the Presidential
Apparat. She was straightforward about asking why the
Embassy had not responded to the "signals" being sent by the
GOU seeking greater engagement. The NDI representative got
the impression that the GOU does not want to be the one to
ask but is awaiting overtures from the US side. She asked
him about how much emphasis the US intends to place on human
rights issues in assessing the scope of reengagement, which
is definitely an area of concern for the GOU. She
specifically mentioned Andijon and seemed to be gauging
whether demands for follow-up might fade. (Note: Emboffs
have indeed picked up on hints put forth by GOU officials
implying that increased programming would be welcome,
particularly on law enforcement. The recent decision to deny
accreditation renewal to Washington Group International (WGI)
to complete the portal monitor border security project is,
though, certainly not a positive signal. End note.)

Comment
--------------


4. (C) While emboffs have been noticing signs of increased
GOU willingness to engage on some issues, it would be
surprising if the GOU were impatient for US overtures prior
to the Presidential elections. It would also be inconsistent
with the recent decision to deny accreditation to WGI to
complete the DTRA portal monitor border security project.
Such incongruence may suggest divisions between factions
within the Apparat who want closer ties and NSS stakeholders
who want to protect entrenched interests. This and other
contact with the GOU is leading us to wonder whether

TASHKENT 00002000 002 OF 002


information passed through MFA is reaching all appropriate
officials in Apparat and NSS. The MFA's effort to intercept
a meeting the Ambassador requested with President Karimov to
discuss human rights issues is a further reflection of this
dynamic (septel).
NORLAND