Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07TASHKENT1481
2007-08-14 08:48:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Tashkent
Cable title:  

PASSING THE BUCK ON MONEY LAUNDERING

Tags:  PGOV EFIN PTER KTFN UZ 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO9571
RR RUEHDBU
DE RUEHNT #1481/01 2260848
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 140848Z AUG 07
FM AMEMBASSY TASHKENT
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8303
INFO RUEHAH/AMEMBASSY ASHGABAT 3215
RUEHTA/AMEMBASSY ASTANA 9371
RUEHEK/AMEMBASSY BISHKEK 3826
RUEHDBU/AMEMBASSY DUSHANBE 3688
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TASHKENT 001481 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/14/2017
TAGS: PGOV EFIN PTER KTFN UZ
SUBJECT: PASSING THE BUCK ON MONEY LAUNDERING

REF: TASHKENT 1196

Classified By: CDA Brad Hanson for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

-------
Summary
--------

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TASHKENT 001481

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/14/2017
TAGS: PGOV EFIN PTER KTFN UZ
SUBJECT: PASSING THE BUCK ON MONEY LAUNDERING

REF: TASHKENT 1196

Classified By: CDA Brad Hanson for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

--------------
Summary
--------------


1. (C) Government of Uzbekistan officials provided little
information on anti-money laundering efforts during a
roundtable with international donors on August 7. Donors
expressed concern at the suspension of Uzbekistan's money
laundering law, warning that the decision makes Uzbekistan's
participation in global anti-money laundering efforts more
problematic. They also noted that designing effective
assistance programs is difficult because of the lack of
information about the problem. Government officials in
attendance played down the effect of suspending the law,
claiming that anti-money laundering efforts were continuing.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs accused donors of being more
interested in insulting Uzbekistan than in assisting it;
rather than ask for information they have no right to, donors
should provide a list of assistance they are willing to
provide and let Uzbekistan decide what it needs. Money
laundering is a difficult subject to discuss here. Most
people suspect that most instances involve senior government
officials or other members of the Uzbek elite, but few are
willing to commit (at the very least) career suicide by
saying so out loud. End summary.

--------------
Donor Q&A
--------------


2. (SBU) The World Bank and the United Nations Office on
Drugs and Crime (UNODC) co-sponsored a roundtable of
international donors and Government of Uzbekistan (GOU)
officials August 7 to discuss anti-money laundering (AML) and
terrorist finance issues. Government representatives came
from the Central Bank of Uzbekistan, State Tax Committee, and
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The stated purpose of the
meeting was for government officials to brief donors on the
current money laundering situation and trends and to provide
insight into what type of future assistance would be most
helpful to the GOU.


3. (SBU) Donors expressed concern about the suspension of key

articles of Uzbekistan's money laundering law until 2013
(reftel). They noted that the suspended articles provide
needed authorities for the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU)
set up in the General Prosecutor's Office to investigate
financial crimes and required banks and other financial
institutes to institute systematic client identification
systems. In particular, the World Bank representative noted
that the decision will inhibit Uzbekistan's ability to fully
participate in global AML efforts. Furthermore, it could
result in the Financial Action Task Force citing Uzbekistan
as a country not fully implementing money laundering
requirements and might also threaten Uzbekistan's membership
in the Egmont Group. UNODC's Legal Advisor reminded the GOU
officials that planned international AML assistance had
largely been keyed to the suspended legislation. Donors need
to understand why the decision was made and its implications
so they can determine if the planned assistance still is
relevant and can make any necessary adjustments. Poloff and
the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development both
noted that it also would be helpful to have more information
on money laundering trends and government priorities; without
this information donors are forced to develop assistance
programs blind.

--------------
GOU: Ask Somebody Else
--------------


4. (SBU) GOU officials at the meeting generally played down
the effects of the law's suspension, saying that it would not
harm Uzbekistan's AML efforts. None could say why the law
had been suspended, but noted that if donors really wanted to
know they should have invited the General Prosecutor's Office
and the Ministry of Justice to participate in the meeting.
(Note: The World Bank Representative clarified several times
that both of these organizations had been invited to the
meeting, but had declined the invitation. End note.)
Central Bank representatives claimed that guidelines
requiring banks to know their clients and to report
suspicious transactions to the FIU are still in place. They
acknowledged that the Central Bank no longer has any obvious
legal authority to penalize institutions that fail to

TASHKENT 00001481 002 OF 002


implement these guidelines, but claimed that the General
Prosecutor's Office had assured the Central Bank that such
authority exists within Uzbekistan's criminal and
administrative codes. The Tax Committee asserted that most
money laundering schemes amount to nothing more than efforts
to avoid paying taxes. The GOU has developed a financial
transactions database which is used along with data mining
techniques to identify likely tax cheats. The Tax Committee
representative suggested that if donors really wanted to
assist Uzbekistan's AML efforts, they would do the most good
by helping to improve the tax collection and enforcement
systems.

--------------
MFA: There You Go Again
--------------


5. (SBU) Chief of MFA's UN Division Khamraev intervened at
the conclusion of the meeting to rail against what he
perceived to be unjust criticism of the GOU. He accused
donors of focusing, as usual, on criticizing Uzbekistan for
things it had supposedly done wrong, such as suspending the
AML law, instead of giving it credit for the things that it
had done right. Uzbekistan is fully committed to stamping
out money laundering, he said, but criticism and talk of
"black lists" amount to political pressure against the GOU
and will not be tolerated. Khamraev said that if donors lack
information, it is their own fault for "insulting" Uzbekistan
rather than working with the GOU. The GOU alone will decide
what information it will provide; rather than demand
information to which they have no right, donors should simply
provide the GOU with a list of assistance they are willing to
provide and let the government decide what it wants to accept.

--------------
Comment
--------------


6. (C) If donor representatives were hoping for a substantive
discussion at the meeting they were disappointed. Many were
struck (and annoyed) both by the GOU's unwillingness to
provide even a minimal amount of information and its
insistence on taking offense where none was intended. Even
minus the pyrotechnics, a substantive discussion of money
laundering in Uzbekistan is difficult. Most everyone
suspects that most instances of money laundering here involve
senior government officials, organized crime figures
associated with them, or other members of the Uzbek elite
seeking to feather nests or purchase vacation homes abroad.
Any mention of this, however, is taboo to the point of being
lethal, to one's career if not to one's life.
HANSON