Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07TASHKENT1197
2007-06-25 11:19:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Tashkent
Cable title:  

JEHOVAH'S WITNESS SAMARKAND CONVICTION UPHELD ON

Tags:  PHUM KIRF UZ 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO4963
PP RUEHDBU
DE RUEHNT #1197/01 1761119
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 251119Z JUN 07
FM AMEMBASSY TASHKENT
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8057
INFO RUEHAH/AMEMBASSY ASHGABAT 3113
RUEHEK/AMEMBASSY BISHKEK 3725
RUEHDBU/AMEMBASSY DUSHANBE 3589
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 7108
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE 2008
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0776
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TASHKENT 001197 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR SCA/CEN, DRL, AND DRL/IRF

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/25/2017
TAGS: PHUM KIRF UZ
SUBJECT: JEHOVAH'S WITNESS SAMARKAND CONVICTION UPHELD ON
APPEAL


Classified By: CDA BRAD HANSON, FOR REASONS 1.4 (B, D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TASHKENT 001197

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR SCA/CEN, DRL, AND DRL/IRF

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/25/2017
TAGS: PHUM KIRF UZ
SUBJECT: JEHOVAH'S WITNESS SAMARKAND CONVICTION UPHELD ON
APPEAL


Classified By: CDA BRAD HANSON, FOR REASONS 1.4 (B, D)


1. (C) Summary: A Jehovah's Witness in Samarkand was
convicted on May 14 of illegally teaching religion and
sentenced to two years' imprisonment. His associates claimed
he had never committed the act of which he was accused, and
that testimony favorable to his case had been erased from
trial records. They reported also that the defendant was
beaten in detention after his conviction. Court authorities
refused to admit foreign observers to the appeal hearing, at
which judges upheld the original sentence. The timing was
unfortunate, coming the week before a visit by Ambassador at
Large for International Religious Freedom John Hanford.
Authorities could easily have arranged for the release of
this prisoner of conscience as a show of goodwill, or at
least admitted a diplomat to observe the proceedings. They
chose not to do so. End summary.


2. (C) On May 14, a district criminal court in Samarkand
convicted Jehovah's Witness Irfan Hamidov of illegally
teaching religion and sentenced him to two years'
imprisonment in a labor colony. According to Jehovah's
Witnesses sources, two "victims" in the case -- i.e., those
to whom Hamidov was allegedly ministering -- in their court
testimony initially denied ever having seen or met Hamidov.
Two days later, the two witnesses reportedly recanted their
statements and stated that Hamidov had ministered to them, as
was written in prepared statements over their signatures.
Hamidov's lawyer told Poloff that he examined the court
records of his initial trial and found that the initial
testimony of the two "witnesses," which would have supported
Hamidov's case, had been expunged and replaced with the
prepared text incriminating Hamidov. Following the
conviction, according to fellow church members, Hamidov was
severely beaten in detention.


3. (C) On June 19, the Samarkand Province Criminal Court was
scheduled to hear Hamidov's appeal. The Amcit Associate
General Counsel of Jehovah's Witnesses, based in New York,
traveled to Uzbekistan to meet with Uzbek officials and
assist in Hamidov's defense. A Kazakh citizen attorney
traveled from Almaty to represent Hamidov in court, together

with an Uzbek-citizen attorney already engaged in the case.
Poloff traveled to Samarkand to monitor the proceedings.


4. (C) The appeal hearing, initially scheduled to begin at
10:00 a.m. on June 19, was delayed until late afternoon
without explanation, and then postponed until two days later.
Court clerks invited the defendants' immediate family
members into the courtroom, but refused to admit Poloff, the
Associate General Counsel, or the Kazakh attorney. One of
the court judges, speaking to the Uzbek attorney, refused to
admit any foreign citizens, citing a June 2005 Cabinet of
Ministers decree which requires all foreigners to receive
advance written permission of the Supreme Court in order to
observe criminal court proceedings. (Note: Another judge in
the case, when the attorney presented an official letter from
the Embassy requesting permission for Poloff to monitor the
hearing, literally jumped from his seat and hurriedly left
the courtroom. End note.)


5. (C) The hearing commenced on June 21, and again judges
prohibited foreign visitors from entering. (Note: The
Foreign Ministry's response to Post's diplomatic note
requesting access was that, because of the late submission,
access would unfortunately not be possible. End note.)
Those who were admitted to the courtroom reported that
Hamidov's sentence remained unchanged. The judge refused to
entertain a motion to have the court records from the
original trial re-examined, or to have observers from the
original trial testify as to the actual testimony of the
witnesses. However, Hamidov's sister was allowed to submit
testimony corroborating Hamidov's defense.


6. (C) Comment: The timing of Hamidov's case was particularly
unfortunate for the Uzbek Government, coming immediately
before the arrival of Ambassador at Large for International
Religious Freedom John Hanford for meetings to discuss ways
to remove Uzbekistan from the list of Countries of Particular
Concern. Hamidov's case exemplifies several of the reasons
that Uzbekistan was placed on the list, including targeted
prosecution of adherents of particular faiths, enforcement of
a draconian ban on proselytism, and physical mistreatment of

TASHKENT 00001197 002 OF 002


religious prisoners. The trial process also highlights
another more general human rights problem: the closed-open
trial, to which only selected observers are admitted. Recent
experience has demonstrated that, when officials in Tashkent
so desire, they can easily arrange for the quick release of
prisoners who have been wrongly convicted, or at the very
least allow for diplomats to observe criminal trials,
regardless of any decree to the contrary. In this case, the
Government simply chose the opposite path.

HANSON