Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07TALLINN604
2007-09-14 06:43:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Tallinn
Cable title:
ESTONIA ON ALLIANCE ATTITUDES TOWARD NAC VISIT TO
how-toVZCZCXYZ0014 OO RUEHWEB DE RUEHTL #0604 2570643 ZNY CCCCC ZZH O 140643Z SEP 07 FM AMEMBASSY TALLINN TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0173 INFO RUCNCFE/CONVENTIONAL ARMED FORCES IN EUROPE IMMEDIATE RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW IMMEDIATE 2551 RUEHSI/AMEMBASSY TBILISI IMMEDIATE 0174
C O N F I D E N T I A L TALLINN 000604
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
FOR EUR/NB - KATHERINE GARRY
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/14/2017
TAGS: PREL NATO GG RS EN
SUBJECT: ESTONIA ON ALLIANCE ATTITUDES TOWARD NAC VISIT TO
GEORGIA
REF: STATE 125337
Classified By: DCM Karen Decker for reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)
C O N F I D E N T I A L TALLINN 000604
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
FOR EUR/NB - KATHERINE GARRY
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/14/2017
TAGS: PREL NATO GG RS EN
SUBJECT: ESTONIA ON ALLIANCE ATTITUDES TOWARD NAC VISIT TO
GEORGIA
REF: STATE 125337
Classified By: DCM Karen Decker for reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)
1. (C) On September 11, poloffs delivered reftel points to
Arti Hilpus, MFA Director for Security Policy, and Toomas
Lukk, MFA Director for Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
Hilpus and Lukk emphasized strong Government of Estonia
(GOE) support for the proposed North Atlantic Council (NAC)
visit to Georgia but stated that the opinions of important
Alliance members, like Germany and France, would carry
significant weight. Hilpus told us that Germany has been
openly skeptical about the utility of the visit, viewing it
as "an unnecessary disruption to Russian interests," while
France is "suspicious" and is uncertain the visit is
necessary at all. Lukk commented that German opposition to
the NAC visit reaches all the way to Foreign Minister
Steinmeier. NOTE: Post now understands a NAC visit to
Georgia has failed to garner enough support in Brussels and
is unlikely to occur in the near term. END NOTE.
2. (C) Lukk commented that the international community has
not properly responded to the missile incident in Georgia
and that it is "crunch time" for the EU and NATO to clearly
show their support. From its own experience in dealing
with Russia, Lukk said that Estonia understands the crisis
Georgia faces as Russia continues to test the limits of
Georgian sovereignty. Therefore, Estonia will continue to
press the international community to keep Georgia on its
agenda. As an aside, Lukk noted that it was very likely
Russia would try to block the OSCE from issuing a statement
in support of Georgia as it had done in the UN Security
Council. Consequently, the GOE believes that it is up to
NATO and the EU to counter Moscow's opposition.
3. (C) Both Hilpus and Lukk said that the standoff between
Georgia and Russia must be framed in the larger context of
Georgia's aspirations to join NATO and the EU. In Lukk's
opinion, this crisis with Russia is just the latest
manifestation of Moscow's efforts to discourage Georgia's
aspirations to join NATO. At the same time, the current
temperature among NATO allies regarding extending NATO's
Membership Action Plan to Georgia is "not as high as
expected or hoped." According to Hilpus, Europe is split
along the usual lines of "old" and "new" members: countries
like France, Germany, Belgium, etc. versus the newer
members from Eastern Europe. However, Lukk said, Estonia's
position is short and clear: it is "time to say yes to
Georgia."
PHILLIPS
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
FOR EUR/NB - KATHERINE GARRY
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/14/2017
TAGS: PREL NATO GG RS EN
SUBJECT: ESTONIA ON ALLIANCE ATTITUDES TOWARD NAC VISIT TO
GEORGIA
REF: STATE 125337
Classified By: DCM Karen Decker for reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)
1. (C) On September 11, poloffs delivered reftel points to
Arti Hilpus, MFA Director for Security Policy, and Toomas
Lukk, MFA Director for Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
Hilpus and Lukk emphasized strong Government of Estonia
(GOE) support for the proposed North Atlantic Council (NAC)
visit to Georgia but stated that the opinions of important
Alliance members, like Germany and France, would carry
significant weight. Hilpus told us that Germany has been
openly skeptical about the utility of the visit, viewing it
as "an unnecessary disruption to Russian interests," while
France is "suspicious" and is uncertain the visit is
necessary at all. Lukk commented that German opposition to
the NAC visit reaches all the way to Foreign Minister
Steinmeier. NOTE: Post now understands a NAC visit to
Georgia has failed to garner enough support in Brussels and
is unlikely to occur in the near term. END NOTE.
2. (C) Lukk commented that the international community has
not properly responded to the missile incident in Georgia
and that it is "crunch time" for the EU and NATO to clearly
show their support. From its own experience in dealing
with Russia, Lukk said that Estonia understands the crisis
Georgia faces as Russia continues to test the limits of
Georgian sovereignty. Therefore, Estonia will continue to
press the international community to keep Georgia on its
agenda. As an aside, Lukk noted that it was very likely
Russia would try to block the OSCE from issuing a statement
in support of Georgia as it had done in the UN Security
Council. Consequently, the GOE believes that it is up to
NATO and the EU to counter Moscow's opposition.
3. (C) Both Hilpus and Lukk said that the standoff between
Georgia and Russia must be framed in the larger context of
Georgia's aspirations to join NATO and the EU. In Lukk's
opinion, this crisis with Russia is just the latest
manifestation of Moscow's efforts to discourage Georgia's
aspirations to join NATO. At the same time, the current
temperature among NATO allies regarding extending NATO's
Membership Action Plan to Georgia is "not as high as
expected or hoped." According to Hilpus, Europe is split
along the usual lines of "old" and "new" members: countries
like France, Germany, Belgium, etc. versus the newer
members from Eastern Europe. However, Lukk said, Estonia's
position is short and clear: it is "time to say yes to
Georgia."
PHILLIPS