Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07SUVA109
2007-02-14 18:16:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Suva
Cable title:  

PACIFIC REGIONAL INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK (RIF) -

Tags:  PREL AORC SENV EAID EFIS XV FJ 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO8187
PP RUEHAP RUEHKN RUEHKR RUEHMJ RUEHNZ RUEHPB
DE RUEHSV #0109/01 0451816
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 141816Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY SUVA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3786
INFO RUEHAP/AMEMBASSY APIA 0149
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 1576
RUEHKN/AMEMBASSY KOLONIA 0184
RUEHKR/AMEMBASSY KOROR 0104
RUEHMJ/AMEMBASSY MAJURO 0626
RUEHPB/AMEMBASSY PORT MORESBY 1156
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON 1352
RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 0370
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0777
RHHJJAA/JICPAC HONOLULU HI
RHMFIUU/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 SUVA 000109 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL AORC SENV EAID EFIS XV FJ
SUBJECT: PACIFIC REGIONAL INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK (RIF) -
AN UPDATE

REF: A. 06 SUVA 434


B. 06 SUVA 490 (AND PREVIOUS)

Work resumes on Pacific agency regional restructuring
--------------------------------------------- ---------
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 SUVA 000109

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL AORC SENV EAID EFIS XV FJ
SUBJECT: PACIFIC REGIONAL INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK (RIF) -
AN UPDATE

REF: A. 06 SUVA 434


B. 06 SUVA 490 (AND PREVIOUS)

Work resumes on Pacific agency regional restructuring
-------------- --------------

1. (U) The Pacific Plan Action Committee (PPAC) met at
Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) headquarters in Suva on Feb. 14.
The agenda included an update on a proposed restructuring of
regional technical organizations, the Regional Institutional
Framework (RIF) (ref A). Embassy Suva was invited to the RIF
portion of the agenda, which follows from a decision at last
October's PIF Leaders Meeting in Nadi (ref B) to defer action
on the RIF pending a thorough review. The USG has a
particular interest because of its memberships in the
Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC) and the South

SIPDIS
Pacific Regional Environmental Program (SPREP). A
restructuring proposal from last year would have amalgamated
the SPC, SPREP, and several other technical agencies under
one SPC-like umbrella organization. The USG raised concerns
in particular about financial, legal, and efficiency aspects
of that concept.

Pangalinan to manage the process; all options open
-------------- --------------

2. (U) PPAC has hired Lou Pangalinan, the highly respected
former SecGen of the SPC and a U.S. citizen of Guam heritage,
as "manager" for the review in the lead-up to the next PIF
Leaders Meeting to be held in Tonga in October 2007.
Pangalinan's first deadline, though, is the next PPAC meeting
in early June. Second deadline will be the pre-Forum PPAC
meeting in September. She stressed that the RIF concept is
intended to achieve whatever regional arrangements are most
appropriate to implement the agreed "Pacific Plan." No
decisions have been made. Topics that must be addressed in
detail include: what needs fixing in the current
arrangements? if integration of regional agencies is
proposed, what is the clear rationale? what are the legal
implications for each current agency and for an amalgamation?
what are the financial implications? and what would an
amalgamated governance structure look like?

A transparent and inclusive process
--------------

3. (U) Pangalinan stressed her commitment to have the process
of attempting to answer those questions be entirely
transparent and inclusive, with all interested nations,
territories, and agencies having every opportunity to
contribute. Since Pangalinan's work plan is still under
discussion, details are not yet available. She will
distribute the work plan ASAP. One way she intends to
communicate is via a RIF internet discussion forum in which
all parties can participate. She will hire staff, including
lawyers, to work through the various issues. The goal is to
have a "consensus" proposal for Pacific leaders to discuss
and bless in October, with the governing councils of all
affected agencies then to consider the proposal and make
decisions before the end of 2007.

Some criticism from the region
--------------

4. (U) Pangalinan's brief overview generated several comments
from PPAC members. A Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA)
representative expressed strong criticism of last year's RIF
proposal that would have split the FFA into a
policy/negotiating element to be integrated into the PIF and
technical elements to be amalgamated under the SPC umbrella.
The FFA rep argued that fisheries functions and expertise
must stay united if the region is to negotiate successfully
with "big powers" like the U.S., China, Japan, and the EU.
Representatives from Samoa and the FSM added their concerns
about splitting the FFA, expressed skepticism about the need
for change, and suggested, in effect, that "if it ain't
broke, don't fix it." On the other hand, the New Zealand rep
advised that every organization needs an assessment
occasionally. A Fiji rep asked all parties to be "open
minded" and suggested some may have to sacrifice sacred cows.
Pangalinan's response to that series of comments was that
change is never easy, and the RIF process needs to ensure any
proposal is well-informed and reflects a regional consensus.

Comment

SUVA 00000109 002 OF 002


--------------

5. (U) During a coffee break, we congratulated Pangalinan on
her new responsibilities and confirmed that she is well aware
of USG issues re the RIF, recalling ref A themes. With her
background, we are very confident she will value USG input to
the work plan.
DINGER