Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07STATE167347
2007-12-14 23:52:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Secretary of State
Cable title:  

EXTENDING THE LIFE OF THE IAMB FOR IRAQ

Tags:  EFIN AA 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO2551
OO RUEHBZ
DE RUEHC #7347/01 3490012
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 142352Z DEC 07
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO UN SECURITY COUNCIL COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHGB/AMEMBASSY BAGHDAD IMMEDIATE 4493
RUEHKU/AMEMBASSY KUWAIT IMMEDIATE 2438
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK IMMEDIATE 0046
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 STATE 167347 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EFIN AA
SUBJECT: EXTENDING THE LIFE OF THE IAMB FOR IRAQ

REF: STATE 165490

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 STATE 167347

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EFIN AA
SUBJECT: EXTENDING THE LIFE OF THE IAMB FOR IRAQ

REF: STATE 165490


1. (U) This is an action request. See paragraph 6.


2. (U) Objective: To explain the role of the IAMB and ensure
that the Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development is
aware that the renewal of the Development Fund for Iraq
(under a new UNSCR) will also require renewal of the IAMB.
UNSC capitals may also draw on these points if asked about
the IAMB when discussing the MNF-I/DFI renewal (reftel).


3. (SBU) Background. The International Advisory and
Monitoring Board for Iraq (IAMB) was created by UNSCR 1483 as
an international oversight body to monitor the use of
Development Fund for Iraq (DFI) funds -- which are primarily
Iraq's petroleum revenues for the benefit of the people of
Iraq. Its original membership consisted of senior level
representatives from the UN, World Bank, IMF, and the Arab
Fund for Economic and Social Development; following the
IAMB,s formation, the Government of Iraq (GOI) joined the
board. The IAMB provides important oversight and
transparency for the nearly $24 billion in the DFI. To carry
out its mandate, the IAMB contracts with outside accounting
firms to audit the DFI for 12 month periods. Historically
the IAMB has been heavily critical of the US
administration of DFI funds during the CPA era. More
recently the IAMB has focused its attention on the GOI and
its lack of internal controls within the Ministry of Finance
(MOF) and Central
Bank of Iraq (CBI) for monitoring and accounting for DFI
funds. The World Bank currently serves as the chair of the
IAMB and will continue to do so until the end of 2007 when
the IAMB mandate, the DFI, and immunities for the DFI,
Iraq,s petroleum revenues, and certain other assets are set
to expire.


4. (SBU) As part of the resolution extending the MNF-I
mandate and the DFI arrangements for the calendar year 2008
which the U.S. and UK introduced into the Security Council on
December 10, we intend to seek also the extension of the
mandate of the IAMB until the end of 2008. In addition, we
will seek a complementary one-year extension of privileges
and immunities for the fund, Iraq,s petroleum revenues, and
certain other assets. We have encountered resistance from
various IAMB members to the prospect of extending the IAMB,s
mandate. The members of the IAMB feel that its DFI oversight
responsibilities should be turned over to the Iraqi Committee

of Financial Experts (COFE). Earlier this year, those
countries and institutions participating in the International
Compact with Iraq, including the UN, the IMF, and the World
Bank, recommended the continuation of the DFI until a Single
Petroleum Account is established by Iraq (target date 2008).
The U.S./UK position is that as long as the DFI exists, and
benefits from privileges and immunities conferred by the
Security Council, there must be international oversight of
the use of those funds. In the past, donor countries,
including members of the Security Council, have judged the
role of the IAMB to be critical. It is our judgment that in
order to successfully obtain support from the Security
Council for an extension of DFI authorities, we will need to
ensure the complementary role of the IAMB continues as long
as the DFI is in existence. On behalf of the UN, Warren
Sach, the UN Comptroller, plans to brief the Council on
Tuesday, December 18 on DFI/IAMB extension.


5. NEA/I met with the IMF members (Bert Keuppens and Mary
Hoare) at their request to discuss the DFI/IAMB extension on
Friday, December 7, and EEB also engaged the World Bank,
Caroline Harper, to deliver the same message. The IMF
representatives expressed some fatigue about their continued
oversight responsibilities for the DFI but said that they
recognized the importance of the DFI immunities and would
continue to assist Iraq by serving in this capacity. They
outlined their vision for the role that the IAMB will play in
2008 by saying that while they will not abdicate
responsibility for DFI oversight, they will task most of the
functions of the IAMB to COFE and outline strict benchmarks
to which COFE will adhere. The USG plans to work with the
GOI and IAMB to assist in the transition from IAMB to COFE
oversight. In this regard 2008 will be a dry run for COFE
under the watchful eye of the IAMB. Mr. Keuppens indicated
that the next IAMB meetings, scheduled for Dec. 12-13, will
be postponed until January, at which point the next UNSCR
will most likely be a reality. Mr. Keuppens indicated that
he was attending the meeting with NEA and EEB on behalf of

STATE 00167347 002 OF 003


the IAMB writ large and would carry this message forward to
the rest of the members of the IAMB. The World Bank also
indicated it is willing to serve on the Board for another
year, but requested clearer guidance from the USG on goals
and outcomes for the remaining oversight period.

End
Background.


6. (SBU) Action Request(Embassy Kuwait): Embassy Kuwait is
requested to inform the Arab Fund for Economic and Social
Development at the most senior appropriate level as soon as
possible regarding the upcoming UNSCR extending the current
arrangements for the DFI/IAMB. Coordination with the UK
should be undertaken where appropriate. (Note: Additional
information regarding the MNFI/DFI/IAMB renewal UNSCR can be
found in Reftel State 165490)

(UNSC Members): If asked in the context of discussing renewal
of the MNF-I/DFI (reftel),Posts are authorized to draw on
background and Q's and A's in this message. (Note:
Additional information regarding the MNFI/DFI/IAMB renewal
UNSCR can be found in Reftel State 165490)


The following Q,s and A,s can be used when engaging these
institutions.


Begin Q,s and A,s:

Q: Development Fund for Iraq (DFI) was established during the
occupation/transition.
Why does the DFI still need to exist now that there is a
sovereign government?

A:

z The DFI was established to serve as the single account
for all Iraqi oil and natural gas proceeds. A single oil
proceeds account increases transparency and helps to
facilitate an equitable distribution of Iraq,s natural
resources among the various groups in Iraq. This has been
shown to be the case in several other countries.

z Maintaining a single, transparent account into which
all of Iraq,s oil proceeds are deposited is an
important confidence building measure among the various
groups in Iraq as they continue to make progress on oil and
revenue sharing laws.

Q: What does the International Compact with Iraq (ICI) say
about the DFI?

A:

z The ICI calls for the establishment of a Single
Petroleum Account to succeed the DFI as a priority action for

2008. All revenues from petroleum operations due to the
Government of Iraq are to be deposited into this account.
(Section 4.1.1).

Q: Why should the DFI continue to merit privileges and
immunities?

A:

z The international community agreed that it was unjust
to punish the Iraqi people for the misdeeds of Saddam
Hussein,s regime, so it granted immunities to the DFI (and
other Iraqi assets) to protect Iraqi funds crucial to the
reconstruction of Iraq from the risk of attachment due to the
enormous
amounts of outstanding Saddam-era debt.

z While the GOI has made great strides in concluding
bilateral debt agreements with many countries,
immunity from attachment remains an important component of
the DFI.

z Providing immunities to the DFI (and other Iraqi
assets) sends an important signal that the international
community remains united behind the Iraqi government,s
efforts to rebuild
and reform.

z Removing immunities now could economically destabilize
the nascent Iraqi economy and thereby further destabilize
Iraq.

STATE 00167347 003 OF 003



z Iraq must still conclude debt deals with several major
creditors, as well as address the pending lawsuits against
Saddam that arose post-September 11, 2001.

z We support the extension of these immunities on a
limited one year basis, as the GOI has requested, and
anticipate that the need for these immunities will be reduced
or eliminated within this
one year period.

Q: Why does the International Advisory and Monitoring
Board for Iraq (IAMB) need to continue?

A:

z We expect that as long as the international community
agrees to extend the DFI and provide the fund with immunities
there should be international oversight of how the DFI is
managed. Because the IAMB has played this role for the last
three years the board members are best placed to provide the
oversight and transparency necessary.

z It is our strong desire to see the IAMB help increase
the capacity of COFE to take on the roles and
responsibilities currently exercised by the IAMB and ensure a
seamless oversight transition from the DFI to its successor
single oil proceeds account.

z We anticipate that the IAMB,s responsibilities will
cease as Iraq normalizes its financial arrangements by
succeeding the DFI through the establishment of a single
petroleum account.

It is also our expectation that the Security Council will
expect the IAMB to continue its role as long as the DFI
exists.

Q: How long do you anticipate DFI will exist?

A:

z Maintaining a single account into which all of the GOI
hydrocarbon revenues are deposited will continue to play an
important role in the reconciliation process for some time to
come. However, we anticipate that the GOI will establish the
successor account to the DFI by the end of 2008 as provided
for in the ICI (Section 4.1.1).
RICE