Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07STATE162747
2007-12-03 20:32:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Secretary of State
Cable title:  

NON-PAPER ON EU/EC PARTICIPATION IN THE UN

Tags:  PREL KCRS EUN UNGA UNSC ECOSOC UN PO 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0021
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHC #2747 3372051
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 032032Z DEC 07
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHLI/AMEMBASSY LISBON IMMEDIATE 4967
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK IMMEDIATE 9811
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS IMMEDIATE
C O N F I D E N T I A L STATE 162747 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/10/2017
TAGS: PREL KCRS EUN UNGA UNSC ECOSOC UN PO
SUBJECT: NON-PAPER ON EU/EC PARTICIPATION IN THE UN
PEACEBUILDING COMMISSION

REF: STATE 5389

Classified By: IO/PDAS James B. Warlick, reasons: 1.4 (b) and (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L STATE 162747

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/10/2017
TAGS: PREL KCRS EUN UNGA UNSC ECOSOC UN PO
SUBJECT: NON-PAPER ON EU/EC PARTICIPATION IN THE UN
PEACEBUILDING COMMISSION

REF: STATE 5389

Classified By: IO/PDAS James B. Warlick, reasons: 1.4 (b) and (d)


1. (SBU) PURPOSE: This is an action request. Post is
requested to deliver the following text on the United States'
(US) position on European Union/European Community
participation in the UN Peacebuilding Commission in a
non-paper to an appropriate host counter-part. The text of
the non-paper is as follows:

The United States welcomes the participation of the European

Union and European Community in the United Nations (UN)
Peacebuilding Commission (PBC) pursuant to UN Security
Council Resolution 1645 and UN General Assembly Resolution
60/180, which are the resolutions establishing the PBC.

We support European Community participation in Organizational
Committee meetings of the PBC as an "institutional donor"
under OP 9 of these resolutions.

We support European Union membership in PBC country-specific
meetings as a "relevant regional organisation" under OP 7(b)
of these resolutions. We do not object to the rotating
European Union Presidency, the European Commission, and the
Secretary General/High Representative collectively occupying

SIPDIS
one seat in the country-specific meetings, behind one
nameplate, with one head of delegation and with one speaker
on any agenda item. Of course, the European Union delegation
is free to choose the person who speaks to a particular
agenda item at these meetings, as any delegation is free to
choose.

We look forward to working with the European Union and
European Community in realizing our shared hopes that the PBC
strongly succeed in carrying out its important mission.


2. DEADLINE: We would appreciate a response by 10 December

2007.


3. (SBU) BACKGROUND: The Department provided guidance on
the issue of European Union (EU) and European Community (EC)
participation in the PBC in January 2007 (reftel). We do not
object to the EU's membership and EC's participation as
described in the non-paper because they do not gain voting
rights; only the 31 PBC member-states have the right to vote
in meetings of the PBC. The EU's right of membership and the
EC's right of participation derive from the resolutions
establishing the PBC.


4. (C) Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for
International Organization Affairs (PDAS) James B. Warlick
clarified the Department's position at the semi-annual US-EU
consultations on the UN (CONUN) in New York City (NYC) in
September, then with the EU Presidency in Washington, DC, in
mid-November. In both instances, the PDAS emphasized that,
while the US government was flexible about the EU choosing to
rotate representatives from the Presidency, the Commission,
and the Council Secretariat in the country-specific meetings,
it must be in a single seat, behind a single nameplate, based
on a single invitation (though we do not oppose the EU
getting more than one copy of the single invitation). Though
the EU institutions may share competence on some of the
issues addressed in the country-specific meetings, that does
not justify an extra seat at the table of an international
organization.


5. (C) Following the mid-November meeting, the Presidency
appears to have gained the impression that the US position
would allow for two EU seats at the table (for the Presidency
and the Commission) behind a single nameplate and that both
could speak on the points according to their competence. The
Department wishes to prevent any continued misperception on
the EU's part on this issue; therefore, we are presenting
this non-paper to the Presidency in NYC, Lisbon, and Brussels
to ensure that the US position is clear and in writing.


6. POINT-OF-CONTACT: Grace M. Kang, IO/PSC, 202-736-7735.
RICE