Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07STATE156111
2007-11-14 16:30:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Secretary of State
Cable title:  

PSI OPERATIONAL EXPERTS GROUP MEETING IN RHODES,

Tags:  KNNP MNUC GR PARM PREL 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO6118
PP RUEHPB RUEHPOD RUEHTRO
DE RUEHC #6111/01 3181652
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 141630Z NOV 07
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHSK/AMEMBASSY MINSK PRIORITY 9876
RUEHMV/AMEMBASSY MONROVIA PRIORITY 1934
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 5849
RUEHMS/AMEMBASSY MUSCAT PRIORITY 9798
RUEHNC/AMEMBASSY NICOSIA PRIORITY 2969
RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO PRIORITY 4843
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 8490
RUEHZP/AMEMBASSY PANAMA PRIORITY 1148
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 5646
RUEHPF/AMEMBASSY PHNOM PENH PRIORITY 6781
RUEHPB/AMEMBASSY PORT MORESBY PRIORITY 0446
RUEHPG/AMEMBASSY PRAGUE PRIORITY 6899
RUEHRK/AMEMBASSY REYKJAVIK PRIORITY 8008
RUEHRA/AMEMBASSY RIGA PRIORITY 9099
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 3799
RUEHSN/AMEMBASSY SAN SALVADOR PRIORITY 8889
RUEHYN/AMEMBASSY SANAA PRIORITY 5868
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO PRIORITY 7534
RUEHVJ/AMEMBASSY SARAJEVO PRIORITY 7436
RUEHGP/AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE PRIORITY 7064
RUEHSQ/AMEMBASSY SKOPJE PRIORITY 3990
RUEHSF/AMEMBASSY SOFIA PRIORITY 9886
RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM PRIORITY 3937
RUEHTL/AMEMBASSY TALLINN PRIORITY 5164
RUEHNT/AMEMBASSY TASHKENT PRIORITY 9319
RUEHSI/AMEMBASSY TBILISI PRIORITY 6134
RUEHTG/AMEMBASSY TEGUCIGALPA PRIORITY 2095
RUEHTV/AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV PRIORITY 1930
RUEHTC/AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE PRIORITY 0365
RUEHTI/AMEMBASSY TIRANA PRIORITY 0315
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 1476
RUEHTU/AMEMBASSY TUNIS PRIORITY 8678
RUEHUM/AMEMBASSY ULAANBAATAR PRIORITY 5333
RUEHVT/AMEMBASSY VALLETTA PRIORITY 5761
RUEHVI/AMEMBASSY VIENNA PRIORITY 3272
RUEHVL/AMEMBASSY VILNIUS PRIORITY 8694
RUEHWR/AMEMBASSY WARSAW PRIORITY 9302
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON PRIORITY 4572
RUEHYE/AMEMBASSY YEREVAN PRIORITY 4530
RUEHVB/AMEMBASSY ZAGREB PRIORITY 9324
RUEHPOD/AMEMBASSY PODGORICA PRIORITY 0577
RUEHTRO/AMEMBASSY TRIPOLI PRIORITY 6870
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 16 STATE 156111 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KNNP MNUC GR PARM PREL
SUBJECT: PSI OPERATIONAL EXPERTS GROUP MEETING IN RHODES,
GREECE (OCTOBER 2-4, 2007)

SUMMARY

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 16 STATE 156111

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KNNP MNUC GR PARM PREL
SUBJECT: PSI OPERATIONAL EXPERTS GROUP MEETING IN RHODES,
GREECE (OCTOBER 2-4, 2007)

SUMMARY


1. The Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) Operational
Experts Group (OEG) meeting took place in Rhodes, Greece on
October 2-4, 2007. Information contained in this cable is
provided for Posts' information and is not to be passed to
non-OEG participant governments. A follow-on cable will
provide a non-paper to pass to host nation governments of all
PSI-endorsing states to keep them abreast of developments in
the PSI OEG.

BACKGROUND


2. Meeting Summary: Greece hosted the fifteenth
Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) Operational Experts
Group (OEG) meeting in Rhodes on October 2-4, 2007. All
twenty participants in the OEG attended (Argentina,
Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy,
Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland,
Portugal, Russia, Singapore, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom,
and the United States). The main foci of this OEG were
discussions on maritime, ground, and air interdiction; United
Nations Security Council Resolutions; disposition and
liability; a Model National Response Plan; intelligence as
evidence; the 2005 Protocols to the Suppression of Unlawful
Acts at Sea Convention (SUA); national updates from OEG
participants; outreach efforts; and PSI exercises. Three
break-out sessions were conducted on the legal, law
enforcement, and intelligence areas related to PSI. Items
proposed by the U.S. included a plan to assist non-OEG PSI
partners on how to implement PSI, the development of a set of
operational and organizational case studies, and the
development of a WMD Commodity Technical Reference Manual.
For further detail, see Chairman's Statement in para 25.


3. Delegation: The U.S. delegation was led by Richard
Douglas, OSD Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Counternarcotics, Counterproliferation, and Global Threats.
The delegation included representatives from the Office of
the Secretary of Defense (Policy and General Counsel),the
Department of State (ISN),the Joint Staff (J5, J3),U.S.
European Command, U.S. Central Command, U. S. Strategic
Command Center for Combating WMD, the Department of Homeland
Security (Customs and Border Protection and General Counsel),

the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of
Energy, the National Counterproliferation Center (DNI),the
Defense Intelligence Agency, the Naval War College, and the

STATE 00156111 002 OF 016


U.S. Embassy in Athens, Greece.


4. Greece Deputy Minister Mr. Ioannis Plakiotakis opened the
plenary session of the PSI OEG on October 2, 2007. The
remainder of the OEG was chaired by Mr. Dionyssios Kyvetos of
the Greek MFA.


5. Maritime Interdiction: For the first time at a PSI OEG,
the issues of bunkering, chokepoints and hubs were the
subject of a panel discussion. Presentations from
representatives of the UK, the Netherlands, Singapore, Japan
and the United States highlighted opportunities and
challenges for PSI at these nodes along shipping transport
routes.


6. Suppression of Unlawful Acts at Sea Convention (SUA):
Greece, Norway, the UK, France and the United States provided
national status updates on the SUA ratification process.
Greece expects ratification by mid-2008. Norway, which
signed the Protocols, expects ratification in late 2009 or
early 2010. Norway noted that additional amendments to their
domestic penal code will be required. France reported that
they are working on changes to their domestic criminal code.
The recent presidential election in France delayed the
ratification process slightly, but it is expected in the
beginning of 2008. The UK, which signed the Protocols in
January 2007, is incorporating them into domestic
legislation. The UK legislation will be publicly available
once it is officially transmitted to Parliament for
consideration. Mr. Gary Sharp (Associate Deputy General
Counsel for International Affairs, Department of Defense)
delivered the U.S. presentation, which relayed that: 1)
implementing legislation was with the White House awaiting
transmittal to Senate (subsequent to the U.S. presentation,
the U.S. delegation learned that the White House transmitted
the bill to the Senate later on October 1, 2007); 2) the U.S.
will circulate the document once it becomes available.
Russia commented that the dual-use definition used in the SUA
Protocols needed additional clarification. The SUA Protocols
are currently under review by the Russian Ministry of
Transportation.


7. Technical Verification Capabilities and Flag State
Consent matrices: Singapore distributed an updated version of
the matrices and offered to continue making updates as new
information was submitted by OEG countries.


8. UNSCRs on Iran and DPRK: Greece opened the discussion by
commenting that UNSCR updates are provided as information to
OEG partners, acknowledging that UNSCR provisions comprise a
part of the international legal framework that the PSI
Statement of Interdiction Principles complements. Russia,

STATE 00156111 003 OF 016


repeating a concern voiced at the Auckland OEG, suggested
that the OEG focus on sharing ideas on the implementation
aspects of UNSCRs rather than risk duplicating the efforts of
relevant UNSC committees. Interventions by Portugal,
Australia, and the United States offered additional insights
on the challenges of and considerations regarding
implementation of relevant UNSCRs.


9. DPRK Shipping / Marine Cartography Initiative: France
presented the latest version of its project to map primary
shipping routes to and from DPRK. The resulting network
revealed opportunities for PSI partners to coordinate
counterproliferation efforts with non-PSI countries. France
recommended the following next steps that OEG partners: 1)
exchange views on DPRK visits to OEG/PSI ports; 2) continue
to gather information for the project; and 3) consider ways
to incorporate the Initiative into PSI outreach efforts. The
U.S thanked France for the excellent project. Poland
recommended that OEG countries work closely with countries
that own ships carrying the DPRK flag.


10. Disposition and Liability: Greece moderated a panel
discussion on the legal aspects of disposition and liability.
The UK, U.S. and Australia presented their views on the
issues. Highlights included: 1) a question posed by Australia
as to whether and when sovereign immunity could be waived in
the cases where WMD-related materials were shipped on
state-owned vessels and aircraft; 2) an inquiry from an OEG
delegate about the number and type of actual cases that had
been brought before judges, implying that there would be
learning value for future OEG discussions on the topic if
factual data were available; 3) a statement by Poland on the
importance of understanding and resolving the disposition and
liability issues before an actual interdiction, which
prompted the observation that the lack of such an
understanding can lead to a critical hesitation to act; and
4) an offer by the UK to lead the development of a
questionnaire that would attempt to break down the logical
layers of questions raised by the issues of disposition and
liability.


11. Use of Intelligence as Evidence: The UK coordinated a
presentation and debate between UK intelligence and law
experts, illustrating the overlaps and tensions between the
approaches taken by these two professional communities. The
presentation underscored the importance of parallel case
construction in achieving the dual ends of protecting
intelligence sources and prosecuting claims. The U.S.
intervened to emphasize that the primary objective of PSI is
to stop proliferation in the first place; making a case for
legal prosecution should come later. An additional point was
made to recognize the differences between PSI partners on the

STATE 00156111 004 OF 016


use of intelligence in a court of law.


12. Exercises: An informal session on Exercises was held
on October 2 before the official opening of the OEG.
Highlights not covered in the Chairman,s statement include:
1) additional detail provided by France about Exercise
"Guistir" in Djibouti, which will focus on Red Sea and Magreb
countries, many of which, according to the French, are
skeptical of Western initiatives but are also concerned with
proliferation issues; 2) a comment made in response to Dr.
Drew Winner's presentation on the Newport Game from June 2007
that there may be value in re-running certain games or
exercises on a periodic basis for the benefit of newcomers to
the PSI community.


13. Ground and Air Interdiction: Julia Mathews (Customs and
Border Protection, DHS) delivered a presentation on the US
Layered Enforcement Strategy. Australia updated the OEG on
the deliberations of the International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) Council on the issue of considering an
amendment that would criminalize the transport of dangerous
materials on aircraft. Australia strongly encouraged OEG
partners to consider the transport offense proposals in
advance of the November 2007 ICAO Council meeting, noting
that such an amendment would be consistent with the PSI
Statement of Interdiction Principles. Australia stated that,
without strong support from OEG countries, the amendment
would likely not be pursued further. In response to
Australia,s presentation, Canada stated that its internal
issues had mostly been resolved and that it was in a position
to support an amendment in a manner analogous to the SUA
Protocols. Russia stated that it could not support an
amendment due to the outstanding technical issues that needed
to be resolved. New Zealand lent its support to the
amendment, emphasizing the importance of covering the "air
gap" in the existing legal framework. UK stated its support.


14. Proliferation Finance: Canada provided an update on
recent Financial Action Task Force (FATF) meetings in Ottawa
and Rome. Delegations agreed to continue including FATF
updates in forthcoming OEGs; hence, the UK confirmed that a
FATF update will be part of the UK-hosted OEG meeting in
February 2008.


15. Outreach: New Zealand provided a briefing on the
Asia-Pacific Outreach Forum held in March 2007 following the
last OEG. Australia reported that Indonesia, Malaysia, and
China declined the invitation, although China expressed some
curiosity about PSI. Australia distributed CDs of
presentations that were part of the Outreach Forum,
suggesting that delegations may find the presentations useful
in future outreach activities. Australia continued with an

STATE 00156111 005 OF 016


update on general PSI outreach in Asia-Pacific: 1) it remains
important to see another major Asia-Pacific country endorse;
2) the Thailand tabletop organized in July 2007 demonstrated
the importance of addressing PSI from a whole-of-government
perspective; 3) Australia called on OEG partners to help fill
the gap in the PSI exercise calendar between Japan's Pacific
Shield exercise in October 2007 and New Zealand,s Exercise
Maru in September 2008. Poland provided an update on its May
2007 outreach event in the Gulf region, noting that there was
widespread participation from the region, including
high-level representation. Poland observed that there were
some misperceptions about PSI, but that the region was ripe
for additional outreach, with an emphasis on exercises. Mr.
Steven Schleien (Director of Transnational Threats, OSD)
delivered a presentation on the need to conduct in-depth
outreach activities with non-OEG PSI partners. The UK stated
that it would include the issue of regional outreach at the
next OEG in February 2008.


16. Industry Outreach: The Netherlands, Portugal, and
Denmark provided updates on recent industry outreach
activities. It was not determined whether or when there
would be a subsequent event with industry.


17. National Updates: Greece delivered a presentation on
combating illicit trafficking of radiological and nuclear
materials. The U.S. provided the following updates: 1)
Kyrgyzstan, Montenegro and Liechtenstein had formally
endorsed the PSI Principles since the Auckland OEG in March
2007, bringing the total number of PSI endorsees as of
October 2007 to eighty-six; 2) the recent "Panamax" exercise,
in which several PSI partners participated, is a good example
of how PSI scenarios can be built into existing mil-mil
exercises; 3) recent counterproliferation talks with the
United Arab Emirates revealed that UAE passed a new export
control law; and 4) the US hosted two counterproliferation
conferences in Monterey in the summer 2007 that were
well-attended by PSI partners. No additional countries
provided updates.


18. Capacity Building / Technical Assistance: New Zealand
presented the latest version of the PSI Model National
Response Plan and requested final comments from OEG partners
by November 1, 2007. Argentina reported that it had not seen
the draft plan and therefore would not be in a position to
comment. New Zealand commented that the draft plan had been
distributed to all OEG partners at the Auckland OEG, so
Argentina should have had ample opportunity to review the
document. Nineteen countries agreed to put their names on
the plan. Vicky Bruch (Principal Member of the Technical
Staff, Sandia National Laboratories) presented the final
version of the WMD/Missile Commodity Technical Reference

STATE 00156111 006 OF 016


Manual and distributed CD and hard copies to all OEG
delegations. This manual catalogues controlled equipment and
commodities (based on UNSCR 1718 lists, export control regime
lists, and other WMD handbooks and would assist anyone who
reviews shipping documentation or export licenses to make
assessments on the controllability of an export (industry,
law enforcement officials, licensing review officials, etc.).



19. Intelligence Breakout Group: See para 25.


20. Legal Breakout Group: See para 25.


21. Law Enforcement Breakout Group: See para 25.


22. UK OEG: The UK announced that it would host the next
OEG meeting in London on February 4-6, 2008. Further details
are forthcoming.


23. PSI 5-Year Anniversary: The U.S. announced that it will
host a meeting in May/June 2008 to commemorate the 5-year
anniversary of PSI. All PSI partners will be invited.
Further details are forthcoming.


24. Bilateral Meetings: The U.S. conducted bilateral
meetings with ten countries: Australia, New Zealand, Greece,
Canada, France, Poland, Argentina, Russia, Japan, and the UK.
Highlights are below:

(a) Greece - DASD Rich Douglas emphasized the importance of
completing a U.S. - Greece PSI shipboarding agreement. The
Greek legal representative from the MFA stated that the
latest version of the agreement was being reviewed by the
Union of Greek Shipowners. Negotiations are stalled on the
issue of liability and compensation. DASD Rich Douglas
pursued the subject during post-OEG meetings in Athens where
Ambassador Xydas of the Greek MFA recommended that Washington
send an interagency team to Athens as a final effort to bring
the negotiations to completion.

(b) Argentina - While Argentina's decision to send Ambassador
Elsa Kelly from the MFA to the OEG was a step in the right
direction, there are still questions about Argentina,s
commitment to PSI. During the bilateral meeting, Ambassador
Kelly focused almost exclusively on the status of the
international legal frameworks, such as the Law of the Sea
Convention and SUA Protocols, and she expressed her
frustration with what she perceived as the U.S. practice of
negotiating treaties but never ratifying them. During the
plenary, the Argentine delegation seemed ill-prepared to
discuss other substantive issues in the OEG, likely due to
their limited levels of participation at the most recent OEG

STATE 00156111 007 OF 016


meetings.

(c) Japan - A productive bilateral meeting was held with
Japan. On the issue of cluster munitions, Japan agrees with
the U.S. that a mandate should come out of the upcoming
Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) meeting to be held
in early November 2007.


25. (U) Begin Chairman's Statement: PROLIFERATION SECURITY
INITIATIVE OPERATIONAL EXPERTS GROUP MEETING
RHODES, GREECE October 2-4, 2007

CHAIRMAN,S STATEMENT



1. The Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) Operational
Experts Group (OEG) met in Rhodes, Greece from October 2nd to
4th, 2007. Experts from twenty countries participated :
Argentina, Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany,
Greece, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, Spain, Turkey, the
United Kingdom and the United States.

Welcoming Remarks.


2. Mr. Ioannis Plakiotakis, Deputy Minister of Defence of
Greece, welcomed PSI Operational Experts to Rhodes and
stressed Greece,s commitment to the PSI principles, as well
as the significance of our common endeavours to counter
proliferation of WMD. In this context, he referred to the
extensive dialogue and understanding which has been
established between PSI countries, creating channels and
modes of co-operation in order to increase the effectiveness
of our efforts.

Maritime Interdiction.


3. PSI Operational Experts focused for the first time on
"Bunkering, maritime choke points and hubs" in a panel
discussion. Representatives from the United Kingdom, the
Netherlands, the United States, Singapore and Japan
highlighted the relevance of these issues to the PSI. The
United Kingdom gave an overview of transshipment centres and
chokepoints and referred to potential targets and
vulnerabilities, while noting that few chokepoints coincide
with transshipment centres. The Netherlands presented
opportunities and challenges for the Initiative at choke
points and hubs and during bunkering in port, on the roads or
on the high seas. Among the challenges mentioned were the
limited capacity of PSI countries in relation to shipping
density, the right of transit passage and the willingness of
coastal states to cooperate. The United States focused on

STATE 00156111 008 OF 016


bunkering and highlighted the difficulties involved in
controlling these kind of activities, given the different
modes by which they can take place, namely by a broker, a
trader or by direct arrangement between shipping companies
and suppliers. Singapore shared its experience as a major
bunkering and maritime hub and provided a case study of the
security regulations and measures that were currently in
place for vessels bunkering within Singapore's port limits,
as well as goods within Singapore's Free Trade Zone. Japan
focused on the importance of ad hoc cooperation at choke
points in tackling proliferation loopholes, especially
between non-PSI coastal states and provided partners with two
recent cases of proliferation concern. Finally, the need to
enhance outreach activities in parallel with ad hoc
cooperation was stressed.


4. From the discussion that followed, particular concerns
were expressed about certain aspects of maritime trade, such
as the opportunities and challenges posed by changes in
ownership or flag state of vessels, and the potential
vulnerabilities which may arise from bunkering activities.


5. PSI Operational Experts then discussed the state-of-play
of the ratification of the 2005 Protocols to the "Convention
on the Suppression of Unlawful Acts (SUA) at Sea against the
Safety of Maritime Navigation". Greece made a presentation on
the legislative measures which will have to be taken with
respect to the ratification procedure. Subsequently, Norway,
the United Kingdom, the United States, France provided
updates and referred to domestic issues that still need to be
addressed for the conclusion of this process. Russia
expressed the opinion that the dual-use goods definition
contained in the SUA amendments was too wide and therefore
open to subjective interpretation.


6. Singapore distributed the latest versions of the matrices
related to "Technical Verification Capabilities" and "Flag
State Consent" and reiterated its intention to continue to
update this information. For this purpose, partners were
invited to submit the necessary inputs to Singapore.

United Nations Security Council Resolutions


7. Greece underlined that the discussion of UNSCRs at OEG
meetings would serve to highlight that PSI partners are
committed to the Paris Interdiction principles in a manner
consistent with national legislation and relevant
international law and legal frameworks, including the
provisions of UNSCRs. Greece made a brief presentation on the
new elements of UNSCR 1747, followed by measures it has taken
to ensure its full implementation. Portugal, which currently
holds the EU Presidency, referred to the 2004 EU Council

STATE 00156111 009 OF 016


Statement, which stressed the importance and relevance of PSI
counter-proliferation efforts, and presented the way in which
the EU is implementing UNSCRs 1737 and 1747. In the
discussion that followed, Russia expressed concern about
duplication of efforts with relevant UNSC Committees and
suggested the OEG should focus on exchanging UNSCRs
implementation experiences which relate directly to the PSI.
With respect to UNSCR 1737, Australia referred to the
difficulties in implementing sanctions on dual-use goods
under OP4c, arising mainly from ambiguity of the information
and underlined the importance of timely exchange of
information. The United States, referring to the informal
open-ended meeting on technical details associated with the
implementation of nuclear transfer-related aspects of UNSCR
1737, which was co-chaired in Vienna by the United States and
the United Kingdom, informed partners that a summary of the
discussions will be distributed at the NSG meeting in
November.


8. France by providing an update on its DPRK Marine
Cartography Initiative, as a case for coordination with other
non-proliferation fora, underlined its significance for
testing PSI procedures in the cooperation between PSI
partners and third countries. France therefore suggested that
gathering and exchange of information, as well as outreach
activities, should be further pursued. Furthermore, France
proposed an exchange of views on national policies towards
DPRK ships visiting their ports.

Disposition and Liability


9. PSI Operational Experts focused on disposition and
liability in a panel discussion on the legal basis and
jurisdictional issues. Greece acted as a moderator and made
an introduction which was followed by three presentations
made by the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia.
It was pointed out that the two topics, disposition and
liability, were distinct and separate from each other and
that the only reason they were connected was that they both
represented areas which had not yet been explored and which
could create problems in cases of interdiction, particularly
of maritime ones. Both topics encompass domestic and
international law aspects. Domestic law systems offered
different solutions on various points and several questions
had to be addressed. As regards disposition, such questions
are: jurisdiction, concurrent requests, the role of judicial
assistance, state practice and jurisprudence. With regard to
liability, the following issues were identified: the extent
of damage for which liability arises, jurisdiction in
connection with liability claims, sovereign immunity, state
practice and jurisprudence. Therefore, the Plenary agreed
that the matter should be further examined by the Legal Break

STATE 00156111 010 OF 016


Out Group.


10. The United Kingdom coordinated a debate on a case
scenario between UK intelligence and law experts, each
presenting the proposed course of action on the use of
intelligence as evidence, depending upon his particular
perspective. One of the main elements of the approach
presented was to illustrate that achieving a balance between
source-protection and disclosure is a challenge, and requires
close collaboration between the intelligence and law
enforcement communities.


11. A panel discussion on the use of intelligence as
evidence, as a follow-up to the Auckland OEG meeting, was
moderated by the United Kingdom. Panelists from France and
Canada presented overviews of relevant domestic frameworks on
the use of intelligence as evidence. Information was provided
about the French model which permits, to a certain degree,
the use of intelligence as evidence in administrative and
criminal cases. France also noted that the legal framework
related to counter- proliferation is about to be further
strengthened. Canada focused on issues of how and when
intelligence should be shared and how sensitive information
can be protected from disclosure in the course of judicial
proceedings. The need to conduct a well-coordinated
investigation was underlined, as well as the importance of
carefully deciding, at an early stage, the extent to which
certain information should be shared and how it will be
protected in a prosecution. The observations of the United
Kingdom, France and Canada noted the need to balance the
protection of sensitive information against the protection of
civil rights. Finally, the United Kingdom referred to the
"intelligence as evidence" questionnaire that it had
circulated and asked partners to complete it before the next
OEG meeting.

Exercise Programme


12. The Chair of the Informal Exercise Planning Session
reported to the plenary on the session and on the full
calendar of activities for the period 2007-2010.


13. Japan provided a preview of the upcoming maritime
interdiction exercise "Pacific Shield 07" which it hosted
from October 13-15, 2007. New Zealand presented an outline
of the maritime interdiction exercise "Maru", which is to be
held in Auckland from September 15-19, 2008. France gave an
overview of its maritime interdiction exercise "Guistir",
which will take place in Djibouti on 11-12 March, 2008.
Poland invited partners to participate in the exercise
"Eastern Shield", a multi-modal exercise held in Ukraine from
October 29-31, 2007. The exercise was organised jointly by

STATE 00156111 011 OF 016


Poland, Ukraine and Romania with the participation of other
Black Sea countries. The United States reported back on the
PSI Game held at the Naval War College in Rhode Island in
June 2007. Finally, Poland made short presentations on the
exercises completed in Central and Eastern Europe, the air
interdiction exercise "Smart Raven", in Lithuania in late
April 2007, and the maritime interdiction exercise "Adriatic
Gate" in Slovenia in late May 2007.

Ground and Air Interdiction

14 The US Customs and Border Protection described the
various complementary components of its Layered Enforcement
Strategy. As concerns the jurisdiction of its Law Enforcement
Authority, the presentation focused on measures taken in
cases of detention, seizure and mis-delivery of merchandise.
Australia reported on the results of the meeting of the ICAO
Legal Committee that took place in Montreal in July 2007,
where the issue was raised of whether a transport offence
similar to that adopted in the 2005 SUA Protocol could be
pursued in the aviation context. This Committee agreed that
further consideration of this issue by the ICAO Council would
be necessary and the item will be discussed at the Council in
November 2007. Australia asked OEG partners to consider the
transport offence proposals and consult with their relevant
domestic Ministries before this Council meeting. While some
partners expressed their full support for this initiative,
others needed more time for internal consultations. France
expressed its interest for EU consultations. The United
States provided an update on its overflight consent matrix
and called on partners to continue submitting further inputs.


Proliferation Financing.


15. Canada reported back on the FATF's development of
non-binding Guidance to jurisdictions on effective
implementation of UNSCR prohibitions on WMD proliferation
financing. This Guidance will focus on the implementation of
targeted financial sanctions, activity-based financial
prohibitions and broader financial prohibitions. Canada
informed partners that the Working Group on Typologies will
meet in Bangkok in November 2007 to begin typologies work
that will eventually lead to guidance on broader financial
prohibitions. The United Kingdom will arrange an update on
the FATF process at the next OEG meeting.


Regional Outreach, Industry Outreach, National Organisation.


16. New Zealand reported on the results of the Asia-Pacific
Outreach Forum of March 2007, which generated a useful level

STATE 00156111 012 OF 016


of interest in the PSI, particularly from Pacific Forum
countries. The meeting had resulted in a discussion of the
PSI at two following Pacific Forum meetings and a
recommendation to Forum members to endorse the PSI. In its
presentation, Australia underlined that the PSI has not met
its core potential and that key Asian states, such as China
and India, do not support the PSI. Participation in exercises
was considered one of the most effective ways of promoting
understanding of the PSI and it was also deemed useful to
develop regional tools for outreach activities. Poland
provided an update on the Abu Dhabi seminar held in May 2007,
with wide participation from GCC countries and Yemen. Poland
also briefed partners on global outreach efforts it carried
out on the occasion of the 4th anniversary of the PSI and
presented positions of some countries of prime importance for
PSI outreach. Finally, the United States underlined the need
to assist non-OEG PSI-endorsing nations on the lessons
learnt, the knowledge gained and the tools developed within
the OEG. It discussed the possible methods in which this can
be best achieved and requested partners to offer relevant
suggestions at the next OEG meting. Russia informed partners
on guidelines adopted by member states of the Organization of
the Treaty on Collective Security (OTCS) on interdiction of
illegal trafficking of WMD, their means of delivery and
related materials. Germany announced that it will prepare an
internal website for general information of PSI partners.

Industry Outreach


17. The Netherlands stressed the significance of broad
industry awareness and involvement in PSI-related issues and
underlined that the transport (shipping and air) industry is
a crucial partner. The Netherlands reported on its national
practice. Portugal briefed the OEG on its industry outreach
initiatives, and especially on its seminar on exports control
and non-proliferation. The need to maintain contact with
industry and move towards more direct and sector-based
approaches was highlighted. Denmark and the United Kingdom
provided partners with information on the Danish/UK bilateral
PSI tabletop exercise "Mercury" held in London in early June
2007, which focused on cooperation with industry, in which
industry was a key participant. The exercise identified
various lessons and stressed the value which small bi-lateral
exercises can add and that outreach efforts to industry need
to be further pursued.

National Organisation


18. Greece provided an overview of its experience in
combating the illicit trafficking of radiological and nuclear
materials. It presented the system in place to confront this
threat and underlined the merit of close cooperation between

STATE 00156111 013 OF 016


the IAEA and the Greek Atomic Energy Agency.


19. The United States informed partners that Kyrgyzstan
endorsed PSI principles in September 2007, following
endorsements by Montenegro and Lichtenstein. It also briefed
the OEG on the "Panamax" exercise in Central America and on
the close cooperation that it maintains with the United Arab
Emirates on export controls and mentioned that the latter has
recently passed an export control law. Finally, the United
States informed partners about the two seminars on
counter-proliferation which were held in Monterey, in July
and August of 2007, with the participation of many OEG
countries.

Capacity Building and Technical Assistance


20. New Zealand provided an update on the PSI Model National
Response Plan. Subject to final comments from partners, New
Zealand will publish a final version shortly. All OEG members
were welcome to use the Model Plan as a tool for outreach to
governments. Partners were invited to send any substantive
comments to New Zealand by November 1, 2007 at the latest.
France, Canada and Spain offered to assist with translations
into other languages. New Zealand offered to draft, in time
for the London OEG meeting, a shorter "summary" version of
the Model Plan which could be used for wider public diplomacy
purposes.


21. The United States made a presentation on the WMD/missile
commodity technical reference manual, which was distributed
to the OEG. The purpose of the manual is to increase the
awareness of industry and to help OEG countries in outreach
activities.

Reports from Break Out Group Chairs


22. OEG Legal Breakout Session The Legal Break Out Group
examined all the items of its agenda. It discussed the legal
aspects of the common scenario which contained questions
relating to national law and international law issues.
Participants agreed that maritime and air interdiction
activities have to be conducted in accordance with the
international law, to include law of the sea and
international air law.


23. Singapore and the United States gave updates on the legal
aspects of technical assistance questionnaire, on the legal
reference library, and on the compendium of legal writings on
PSI, respectively. The United States will update the PSI Law
Library annually. The Netherlands presented and distributed
for Delegations a CD with legal background materials. The
Group heard an expos, by Greece on domestic implementation of

STATE 00156111 014 OF 016


the international obligations impacting customs.


24. The Group continued its consideration of disposition and
liability and agreed, following a proposal by the United
States, that partners will communicate to the US Delegation
their views, practices and jurisprudence. The United States
will incorporate the feedback into the non-paper. Following
suggestions at the Plenary and the Break Out Group, it was
decided to examine disposition and liability as separate
items.


25. OEG Law Enforcement Breakout Session. The Law
Enforcement Breakout Group heard presentations by Greece that
highlighted the role of Customs in enhancing security and the
use of risk analysis for the selection of high risk
consignments. The United States made a presentation on the
Secure Freight Initiative, a new cooperative effort that is
considered the first evolution from the Container Security
Initiative (CSI).


26. The group discussed the common scenario and underlined
the importance of incorporating lessons learnt and
experiences gained from the PSI, in the national
communication process, which leads to an uninterrupted
exchange of information and facilitation of communication.
Rapid and accurate exchange of information is crucial for the
timely response of Law Enforcement Agencies.


27. Almost all countries have the authority to control
transit shipments. With regard to maritime interdiction, it
was confirmed that hot pursuit may be conducted under the
terms of Article 111 of the UNCLOS.


28. OEG Intelligence Breakout Session. From the discussion
of the common scenario, the Group concluded that states would
share information even when it is not connected to an ongoing
case. Most of the states would directly communicate with
private companies under specific circumstances, in order to
cooperate and exchange views and information concerning
proliferation activities. It is also very likely that in a
number of states the companies themselves would come in
contact with relevant intelligence agencies. In this context,
partners acknowledged the contribution of PSI experience.
During the past years, numerous states have received
sensitive information concerning PSI activities from OEG and
non-OEG member states related to a PSI incident. Information
has been shared even in cases where such information was
probably already known.


29. The Australian Defence Intelligence Organisation provided
a presentation on DPRK Potential Commercial Shipping Routes
for Proliferation. This presentation indicated that DPRK is

STATE 00156111 015 OF 016


likely to continue using maritime shipments to export cargo
of proliferation concern and complicating the identification
of its proliferation-related shipments. Generic trade routes
are used in an attempt to blend proliferation shipments with
legitimate trade transfers. Identification of chokepoints is
very difficult. Commercial shipping vessels transiting the
DPRK could be exploited for proliferation purposes.


30. The Group also concluded that, if possible, PSI exercises
and games should include lessons learnt and scenarios
covering situations in which PSI countries choose not to
release information to some or all partners. This would
reflect real-life experience.

Next OEG Meeting


31. Delegations welcomed the United Kingdom,s offer to host
the next PSI OEG meeting, which, subject to confirmation,
will take place in London from February 4th to 6th, 2008.

A.O.B


32. Partners welcomed the announcement by the United States
on its offer to host a High Level Political Meeting in
May/June 2008 in Washington D.C., on the occasion of the 5th
anniversary of the PSI.


ANNEX: SUMMARY OF OEG ACTION ITEMS


1. Delegations to submit to Singapore inputs for the matrices
on Technical Verification Capabilities and Flag State
Consent.


2. Delegations to complete the "use of intelligence"
questionnaire and submit it to the United Kingdom before the
next OEG meeting.


3. The United Kingdom to develop a questionnaire on issues
related to disposition and liability for the next OEG meeting.


4. Delegations to provide updates on the Overflight Consent
Matrix to the United States before the next OEG meeting.


5. Delegations were asked to come forward with examples of
"successes", both operational and improvements to national
capabilities, which could be used both to further dialogue
and as outreach tools.


6. Delegations agreed that reporting on FATF activity should
continue.


STATE 00156111 016 OF 016



7. Delegations to continue to share their legislative
experiences relating to the implementation of the 2005 SUA
Protocols with PSI partners.


8. Delegations to consider the ICAO proposal, consulting with
relevant domestic Ministries as appropriate and Australia to
report back on further progress by ICAO towards amending the
existing air legal framework.


9. New Zealand will publish a final version of PSI Model
National Response Plan. Delegations should send any
substantive comments by November 1, 2007. New Zealand will
prepare a summary version of the Model Plan for discussion at
the next OEG meeting.


10. OEG participants to respond to the request from the US to
offer suggestions at the next OEG meeting on how to improve
outreach efforts to non-OEG PSI-endorsing nations.


11. Germany will prepare an internal website for general
information of PSI partners.


12. Delegations to provide information to France on national
policies towards DPRK ships visiting their ports to enable an
exchange of views on that point as a follow-on step to the
cartography project.


13. Delegations to provide comments on and contributions for
the PSI Law Library to the United States before the next OEG
meeting.


14. Delegations to provide input on the US non-paper on
interdiction, disposition and liability to the United States
before the next OEG meeting.

End Chairman's Statement

POINTS OF CONTACT
--------------


26. Please slug responses for OSD GSA (Beth Flores and
State/ISN/CPI (Carlos Guzman). USG POC for PSI Operational
Experts Group issues is OSD/GSA: Beth Flores Phu. USG POC for
operational legal matters is Gary Sharp, DOD/OGC. USG POC for
PSI policy issues is Carlos Guzman, State/ISN/CPI.
RICE