Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07STATE146665
2007-10-19 18:33:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Secretary of State
Cable title:  

NIGHT FLIGHTS: FRANKFURT BAN INCONSISTENT WITH BALANCED

Tags:  EAIR ECON ETRD EUN 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0003
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHC #6665 2921845
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 191833Z OCT 07
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN 0000
INFO RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
RUEHFT/AMCONSUL FRANKFURT 0000
UNCLAS STATE 146665 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAIR ECON ETRD EUN
SUBJECT: NIGHT FLIGHTS: FRANKFURT BAN INCONSISTENT WITH BALANCED
APPROACH

REF: MASON-RUSCH-BYERLY EMAILS 03 BERLIN 997 03 STATE 29293 02
FRANKFURT 1549

UNCLAS STATE 146665

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAIR ECON ETRD EUN
SUBJECT: NIGHT FLIGHTS: FRANKFURT BAN INCONSISTENT WITH BALANCED
APPROACH

REF: MASON-RUSCH-BYERLY EMAILS 03 BERLIN 997 03 STATE 29293 02
FRANKFURT 1549


1. Summary and Action Request: In conjunction with issuance of the
zoning authorization for a new runway at Frankfurt Airport
(anticipated at the end of November, 2007) the Hessen Economic
Ministry is expected to mandate a complete or near complete ban on
night flights at the airport beginning in 2011. The Hessen
Government has made clear that this decision was made at the onset of
planning for the new runway in order to placate public protests tied
to the airport expansion. Put more bluntly, the Hessian
Minister-President has endorsed a political approach of selling to
his constituents an expansion of the airport (and daytime flights) by
banning night flights.


2. Implementation of limits on night-time operations without proper
stakeholder consultation and evaluation of the costs, benefits and
alternative measures - which appears to be the case in this instance
- would be inconsistent not only with the 2001 International Civil
Aviation Organization (ICAO) Assembly Resolution (A33-7) on the
Policies and programmes based on a "balanced approach" to aircraft
noise management, but also with the European Parliament and Council
Directive 2002/30/CE on noise management at European airports.
Neither the ICAO resolution nor the Directive bars night flight
limits as such. While both the Resolution and the Directive respect
the right of States to make the ultimate substantive decision, they
do mandate a procedure for consideration of proposed operational
restrictions at airports that ensures transparency, an opportunity
for stakeholders to participate, and decisions based on solid data on
costs and benefits. The commitment to the "balanced approach" was
underscored in conjunction with the US-EU Air Transport Agreement,
which will be applied as of March 30, 2008. Moving down the path of
placing operating restrictions at airports in a manner inconsistent
with the "balanced approach" and with the effect of limiting U.S.
carriers' market acess will raise fundamental issues in the US-EU Air
Transport Agreement.


3. Post is asked to deliver the talking points in paragraph 7 to
appropriate German government officials at the federal level, noting

USG concern with this decision, and expressing USG willingness to
share with Germany USG experience on these matters covering the full
range of options to address noise around airports. End Summary and
Action Request.


4. BACKGROUND: The proliferation of night flight restrictions at
European airports is an issue that continues to plague the
trans-atlantic aviation relationship. As far back as 2002 just after
the EU's adoption of Council Directive 2002/30/CE, Department was
aware that actions were under consideration in Germany that would
place an absolute ban on night flights at Frankfurt in "exchange" for
approval to build a new runway. Over the years, we have periodically
registered our concern as plans for the new runway waxed and waned on
the horizon (invariably postponed because of political in-fighting).
A decision on night flight restrictions is now imminent.


5. The "balanced approach" to noise management was the international
answer to the EU's unilateral imposition of de facto operating
restrictions on certain "hushkitted" aircraft in Europe. Agreed in
ICAO, and then incorporated into EU law, it addresses noise problems
at the individual airport level with oversight by the national
authority. It is a transparent and consultative process that
provides for an assessment of the individual airport noise situation,
identification of potential measures available to address a noise
problem, and a comparative economic and environmental assessment of
those measures. The goal is to choose the most cost effective
measure or measures to reduce noise. Germany, along with the rest of
the EU member states, was obligated to transpose the Noise Directive,
and the balanced approach, into German law.


6. To our knowledge, the German government has not undertaken a
review consistent with the balanced approach in developing plans for
the new runway at Frankfurt. Cargo carriers such as Fedex are
shifting operations away from Frankfurt in anticipation of the
restrictions. We face similar struggles in Portugal and in Austria.
Moves to impose operating restrictions for U.S. carriers that
undercut the value of market access in a manner inconsistent with the
"balanced approach" raise significant legal and political issues.
This issue is likely to figure prominently in the second stage
negotiations of the US-EU Air Transport Agreement. It is critical
that we continue to lay down firm markers that failure to fully and
in good faith comply with the balanced approach is unacceptable.


7. BEGIN TALKING POINTS

-- Airport noise is a difficult and contentious subject in countries
around the world.

-- With the support of Germany and other EU member states, we reached
an historic consensus at the ICAO Assembly in 2001 on a process (the
"balanced approach") to address noise around airports.

-- That agreement led to the repeal of the so-called EU hushkits
regulation and formed the basis for withdrawal by the United States
of proceedings initiated against Germany and other EU Member States
under Article 84 of the Chicago Convention.

-- The United States welcomed the commitment of EU member states to
the balanced approach in Directive 2002/30/EC.

-- The U.S., the EU, and its member states reaffirmed that commitment
in signing the U.S. - EU Air Transport Agreement, noting in the
memorandum of consultations (MOC) the importance of international
consensus in aviation environmental matters within the framework of
the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO),and the
significance of the unanimous agreement reached at the 35th ICAO
Assembly on aircraft noise(Resolution A35-5).

-- Further the MOC noted that, both sides are committed to applying
the "balanced approach" principle to measures taken to manage the
impact of aircraft noise (including restrictions to limit the access
of aircraft to airports at particular times). Both sides also noted
that where relevant legal obligations existed, whether at
international, regional, national or local level, they also had to be
respected in full.

-- We understand that a decision regarding the authorization of a new
runway at Frankfurt airport is imminent, and that it may include
restrictions or even a prohibition on night-time operations.

-- As noted, Germay is a party to an internationally agreed process
to manage airport noise. All noise management actions contemplated
should be consistent with the Assembly Resolution, incorporated in
the EU Directive, and now anchored in the U.S. - EU Air Transport
Agreement.

-- The balanced approach consists of identifying the noise problem at
an airport and then analyzing the various measures available to
reduce noise through the exploration of four principal elements,
namely reduction at source, land-use planning and management, noise
abatement operational procedures and operating restrictions, with the
goal of addressing the noise problem in the most cost-effective
manner. The views of industry stakeholders and the general public
must be solicited and evaluated.

-- States are urged not to apply operating restrictions as a first
resort but only after consideration of all the elements of the
"balanced approach". Further, views of industry stakeholders and the
general public must be solicited and evaluated.

-- Political decisions inevitably corrode the integrity of the
process and international trust.

-- The U.S. has itself long struggled with difficult airport noise.
We have developed a comprehensive "toolkit" of measures to mitigate
the impact of noise around airports. That toolkit is not limited to
flight bans.

-- We would be pleased to share with you our experience in
implementing these measures. We have had fruitful exchanges with
other countries through meetings with FAA experts, airport
representatives, residents' groups, and airlines in Washington and
other U.S. cities. These exchanges present an overview of the
various approaches to nighttime noise issues undertaken in the U.S.

-- We would welcome the opportunity to arrange such visits for German
officials, including at the state, local and airport level.

-- Let me emphasize that the U.S. is in no way questioning the right
of Germany to make the ultimate decision. Rather, we are concerned
that imposing operating restrictions without adhering to EU
legislation - which reflects ICAO consensus and express
understandings of the Parties to the US-EU Air Transport Agreement -
will undermine the significant impacts on the aviation industry and
the economies that rely on air travel.

-- We urge Germany to adhere to the internationally agreed process on
the balanced approach in moving forward with development at the
Frankfurt airport.
RICE