Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07SOFIA224
2007-02-20 10:39:00
SECRET//NOFORN
Embassy Sofia
Cable title:  

BULGARIA: MFA TAKES HARD LINE ON BLACK SEA HARMONY

Tags:  PREL PGOV NATO MARR MOPS TU BU 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1858
OO RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV
DE RUEHSF #0224/01 0511039
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
O 201039Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY SOFIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 3251
INFO RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM IMMEDIATE
RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUENAAA/SECNAV WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 SOFIA 000224 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DEPT. FOR EUR/NCE, EUR/RPM, PM

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/20/2017
TAGS: PREL PGOV NATO MARR MOPS TU BU
SUBJECT: BULGARIA: MFA TAKES HARD LINE ON BLACK SEA HARMONY

REF: SOFIA 87

Classified By: Amb. John Beyrle, for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 SOFIA 000224

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DEPT. FOR EUR/NCE, EUR/RPM, PM

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/20/2017
TAGS: PREL PGOV NATO MARR MOPS TU BU
SUBJECT: BULGARIA: MFA TAKES HARD LINE ON BLACK SEA HARMONY

REF: SOFIA 87

Classified By: Amb. John Beyrle, for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).


1. (S) SUMMARY: In a February 14 meeting, MFA Regional
Security chief (and resident Black Sea expert) Dimitar
Dimitrov briefed us on the GoB's emerging Black Sea strategy.
He expressed hardening resistance to Bulgarian membership in
Operation Black Sea Harmony (OBSH),and allowed poloff to
review a draft proposal for an alternate security framework
-- dubbed the "Synergy Concept" -- that Bulgaria plans to
present to other littoral states in March. In the long term,
the GoB still wants to see something similar to Operation
Active Endeavor on the Black Sea. Their modest "synergy"
proposal is intended to be a small step toward that desired
end state and an alternative to OBSH, which they increasingly
see as a dead end. END SUMMARY.

Black Sea Harmony
--------------


2. (S) Dimitrov made it clear that the MFA sees "no benefit"
in Bulgarian membership in Operation Black Sea Harmony. As
reported in reftel, the GoB as a whole is unenthusiastic
about OBSH, with only civilian MoD officials viewing the
operation as benign, if not particularly useful. Dimitrov
said that, faced with a near-total inability to justify OBSH
in terms of the Bulgarian national interest, his colleagues
at the MoD's International Cooperation Directorate had been
ordered by Deputy Defense Minister Yankulova to "invent
something" in an effort to make nice with the Americans.
Speaking informally, Dimitrov said the MFA understands that
U.S. support for OBSH is part of a "multifaceted"
U.S.-Turkish relationship, but that did not mean that
Bulgaria would sign on to an agreement that it sees as
against its national interests.


3. (S) For the MFA's part, Dimitrov took issue with the
suggestion that OBSH was a "NATO-affiliated" operation, and
derided its supposed operational utility. OBSH would do
nothing to build trust or capabilities, he said; all it would

accomplish would be to grant Turkey a monopoly over
information flows and encourage Turkish/Russian condominium
as a bulwark against increased NATO engagement in the
Caucasus and Black Sea. Dimitrov also argued that U.S.
suspicion of BLACKSEAFOR is misplaced. Since BLACKSEAFOR
operates by consensus, he said, Russia and Turkey cannot
dominate it as they can Black Sea Harmony, which is at its
core a national operation. According to Dimitrov,
consultations with Romanian counterparts have revealed a
similar suspicion of Turkish motives. Allegedly, when
Romanian naval officers expressed regret to Turkish
counterparts on their lack of operational capability, the
Turks responded that they didn't need Romania's capability --
they just needed them to sign.


4. (S) The MFA and General Staff have offered us detailed
arguments as to why the advertised operational benefits of
OBSH are unlikely to materialize. To begin with, Bulgaria
already shares all the coastal surveillance information it
has directly from its Burgas Center to CC-MAR Naples.
Bulgarian membership in OBSH would not translate into
increased data flows to NATO, nor would it expand Bulgaria's
access to other countries' data -- OBSH calls for information
to be sent from each littoral state to Turkey (and shared
monthly with NATO) but does not provide a mechanism for
information from, e.g., Romania to be regularly shared with
Bulgaria. Who, Dimitrov asked rhetorically, could stop
Turkey if it decided to give Russia information reported by
Bulgaria or Romania? He also made the point that with or
without OBSH, the Black Sea is divided into discrete national
areas of responsibility, and that OBSH would do nothing to
encourage joint operations or operational coordination. The
GoB believes that, bared of rhetoric, OBSH membership will
mean two things: political acquiescence to Russian/Turkish
domination of the Black Sea and Turkish monopolization of
Black Sea operational intelligence -- neither one an
acceptable prospect for Bulgaria.

Bulgaria's proposal: expanded Black Sea info exchange
-------------- --------------


5. (S) Pressed to offer something other than kvetching about

SOFIA 00000224 002 OF 002


Turkey, Dimitrov (protect) agreed to preview Bulgaria's
counterproposal, "something that only 4 or 5 people in the
government have seen." This proposal -- dubbed the "synergy
project" -- seeks to vastly expand transparency and
information exchange in the Black Sea. In meetings with
other littoral states in March, the Bulgarians plan to
propose that:

- All littoral states channel suspect vessel information
through Bulgaria's Burgas center, whereupon it will be made
immediately available to all other littoral states;
- Littoral states agree that information can be exchanged on
"suspect vessels" as such without the need for protocols on
exchange of classified information, and;
- Information gathered by the Burgas Center be shared with
CC-MAR, AIS, VITMISs, SafeSeaNet, Piraeus, Frontex, MSSIS,
SECI, and VRTMC.

Note: This proposal expands on the "Agreement on Cooperation
Among the Border/Coast Guard Authorities of the Black Sea
Littoral States" -- one of the few Black Sea regional
agreements which has the support of all littoral states. The
agreement was signed by five of the six Black Sea countries
on 9 Nov 2006 (Romania did not sign for technical reasons).

Comment:
--------------


6. (S) The "synergy project" is still in the idea stage; it
does not have any formal blessing from the government, and
even if it had, its acceptance by all littoral states is far
from assured. We pass it along, in advance of ADM Ulrich's
visit, as a preview of one direction the OBSH discussions
here might take. By taking an apolitical, pragmatic approach
and emphasizing a "coast guard" rather than naval approach to
Black Sea maritime security, Bulgaria's proposal aims to
sidestep the geo-strategic impasse over Black Sea Harmony,
while showing a way forward that will allow for maximum
exchange of operational information. Stripped of any
political pretensions, the "synergy" project as described to
us is in no way incompatible with eventual Bulgarian
cooperation with OBSH or future NATO engagement in the Black
Sea. If implemented, it could help build sorely-needed trust
between Bulgaria, Romania, and Turkey that will eventually
pave the way for more robust NATO engagement in the Black
Sea. END COMMENT.

BEYRLE