Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07SKOPJE867
2007-10-30 16:08:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Skopje
Cable title:  

MACEDONIA AIMS TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE IN NAME TALKS AT

Tags:  PGOV PREL MK 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO3130
PP RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHSQ #0867/01 3031608
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 301608Z OCT 07
FM AMEMBASSY SKOPJE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6660
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE 0070
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEKDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUESEN/SKOPJE BETA
RUEHSQ/USDAO SKOPJE MK
RHEHNSC/WHITE HOUSE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 SKOPJE 000867 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EUR/SCE (PFEUFFER),
ATHENS FOR CHARGE

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/31/2017
TAGS: PGOV PREL MK
SUBJECT: MACEDONIA AIMS TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE IN NAME TALKS AT
UN NOVEMBER 1

REF: SKOPJE 853 AND PREVIOUS

Classified By: POLOFF MNEISULER, REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D)

SUMMARY

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 SKOPJE 000867

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EUR/SCE (PFEUFFER),
ATHENS FOR CHARGE

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/31/2017
TAGS: PGOV PREL MK
SUBJECT: MACEDONIA AIMS TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE IN NAME TALKS AT
UN NOVEMBER 1

REF: SKOPJE 853 AND PREVIOUS

Classified By: POLOFF MNEISULER, REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D)

SUMMARY


1. (C) The GOM will propose, at the November 1 meeting in New
York to discuss the name issue with Greek counterparts and
with UN Special Envoy Nimetz, four steps that it believes
would help reduce bilateral tensions and help prepare the
ground for more fruitful efforts to resolve the name dispute.
The steps include forming a joint Greek-Macedonian
commission to review both sides' history textbooks; an
invitation to Athens to meet at any level, anywhere, to
discuss a range of bilateral issues including the name;
reaffirming the GOM's earlier commitments to stay out of
Greece's internal politics and respect their mutual border;
and proceeding with the name discussions on the basis of
Nimetz's October 2005 proposal, which posited a time-phased,
"triple name" solution. If forced by Athens to choose
between NATO membership and changing Macedonia's
constitutional name, the GOM has made it clear it will not
sacrifice the name; Macedonian authorities plan to convey
that message diplomatically to NATO allies while taking a
low-key public stance that clashes with Greece as little as
possible. We believe we should support the proposed
confidence-building measures, and should consider how those
measures could be operationalized to begin moving the process
forward. End summary.

MACEDONIA'S NAME NEGOTIATOR SKETCHES FOUR CONSTRUCTIVE STEPS


2. (C) In an October 29 meeting with the Ambassador,
Macedonia's negotiator for the name issue, Ambassador
Dimitrov, outlined the GOM's strategy for the upcoming round
of name talks with his Greek counterpart and Ambassador
Nimetz in New York on November 1. According to Dimitrov, the
Macedonian side is determined to "stay ahead of the curve"
and will propose four specific, constructive steps to build a
"more amicable bilateral atmosphere."

JOINT COMMISSION TO EXAMINE HISTORY TEXTBOOKS...


3. (C) As a first step, the Macedonian team will propose the
formation of a joint commission of Macedonian, Greek and

"independent" historians to review both countries' history
textbooks. The commission could be framed within the context
of the UN-mediated name talks, depending on Athens's
preference. The Macedonian side would seek to consult with
countries with experience in similar initiatives, (e.g.,
France and Germany, Poland and Germany, or some of the Baltic
countries.)

INVITATION TO MEET ANYWHERE, WITH ANYBODY, ABOUT ANYTHING...


4. (C) A second building block of the Macedonian approach
will be an offer to the Greek side to meet at any
governmental level (president, prime minister, ministerial,
or working level). The venue could be in Macedonia, Greece,
or a third country. Skopje would be open to a range of
discussion topics, including but not limited to the name
issue.

REAFFIRM INTENT TO UPHOLDING PREVIOUS COMMITMENTS...


5. (C) The Macedonian government feels that Athens, in its
efforts to present its side of the story, keeps referring to
past bilateral frictions that have, in fact, already been
settled. As a third building block, therefore, Macedonia
would propose a campaign to reiterate and reaffirm the
concessions Skopje already has made (e.g., its pledge to
consider ethnic minority issues in Greece an internal matter,
and its constitutional amendment forswearing any attempt to
change state borders, among others.)

NATO OR THE NAME - A SIMPLE CHOICE FOR A NATION DEFENDING ITS
IDENTITY...


6. (C) Emphasizing that a choice between NATO membership and
keeping the country's constitutional name would present an
untenable choice for Macedonia, Dimitrov confirmed that the

SKOPJE 00000867 002 OF 002


GOM would not sacrifice the name, regardless of the cost.
Suggesting that it would not at any rate be productive for
NATO "to have a frustrated member with a challenged national
identity," Dimitrov said that the government is planning to
launch a diplomatic offensive to confidentially inform all
NATO capitals about its stance in this regard. In that way,
the GOM would make clear to NATO allies how little leeway it
had on the issue. On the public front, Dimitrov promised "a
relatively moderate campaign" in which it would announce its
intent to "intensify efforts on the name talks."

2005 NIMETZ PROPOSAL -- THE BEST BASIS FOR THE NAME TALKS


7. (C) Noting that the Greeks were floating various possible
name formulations with the Europeans, including "Nova
Makedonija," Dimitrov said the GOM would, as a fourth step,
propose that both sides revisit the October 7, 2005 Nimetz
proposal for resolving the impasse as the best basis for
further negotiations. (Note: The essence of the 2005
proposal is a "triple name" formula: "Republika Makedonija"
to be used from 2006-2008 in Macedonia's international
relations; "Republic of Macedonia" to be used in 2009 and
thereafter in Macedonia's international relations; and
"Republika Makedonija-Skopje" to be used by Greece either
officially or in footnotes to multilateral treaties) and a
time element which envisions a 15-year review of the
implementation of the compromise by 2021. End note.)


8. (C) Dimitrov added that Skopje's message to Athens would
be that "the more you increase pressure on us, the more
difficult it becomes for us to be flexible." The GOM also
would be clear in stating that it would not make the choice
between the name and NATO -- "if it comes to that point, it
will be difficult for us to maintain the 1995 Interim Accord
as it currently exists," Dimitrov said.

COMMENT


9. (SBU) As we have noted in reftels, the GOM will
steadfastly resist any suggestion that it change its
constitutional name in exchange for NATO membership. That
position is a shared position that cuts across all party
lines. At the same time, it is willing to look for a way out
of the current impasse by focusing on confidence-building
measures that could help reduce tensions and provide an
atmosphere more conducive to working toward an eventual
resolution of the name issue, perhaps based on the October
2005 Nimetz proposal. In the meantime, we believe we should
support the proposals Dimitrov outlined, and should begin
looking at how they can be operationalized so that the CBM
process can move forward.
MILOVANOVIC