Identifier | Created | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|
07SINGAPORE2086 | 2007-11-20 11:48:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Singapore |
VZCZCXRO1024 PP RUEHDT RUEHPB DE RUEHGP #2086/01 3241148 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 201148Z NOV 07 FM AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4465 INFO RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 0496 RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0305 RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0137 RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI |
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 SINGAPORE 002086 |
1. (C) Summary: ASEAN leaders canceled a planned briefing of the East Asia Summit (EAS) by UN Special Advisor Gambari after Burma strenuously objected during a contentious working dinner involving the leaders at the ASEAN Summit November 19. An MFA source told us Burma's representatives had earlier agreed to the Gambari briefing but apparently had been overruled by regime higher-ups. Philippine President Arroyo reportedly warned her colleagues during the dinner that the Philippines might not ratify ASEAN's landmark Charter if Burma did not free Aung San Suu Kyi and move toward democracy. A separate MFA source told us the Philippines and Singapore were alone within ASEAN in pushing for a harder line on Burma and that China had agreed to the Gambari briefing only after tough negotiations. Singapore as ASEAN Chair issued a statement (see paragraph 7) that reflects ASEAN's lack of consensus on Burma. It notes both Burma's objections and the sentiment of "most leaders" that Burma needs to begin meaningful reform. End Summary. 2. (C) ASEAN leaders announced late November 19 that they had canceled plans to have UN Special Advisor Ibrahim Gambari provide a briefing for leaders of the East Asia Summit (EAS), which includes the ten members of ASEAN plus China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and New Zealand. Singapore had arranged Gambari's briefing of the EAS as a means to focus attention on Burma during the cycle of ASEAN-related summits being held here November 18-22 (ref A). The decision followed strenuous objections from Burma that ASEAN was allowing itself to be used by outside powers to pressure Burma even as it was cooperating with the UN. MFA ASEAN Director Deputy Director Wong Chow Ming told E/P Chief November 20 that Burma's ASEAN representatives had earlier agreed to the Gambari briefing. Burma had only raised objections late in the game, which Wong thought indicated the delegation had been overruled by more senior regime leaders. Once Burma raised objections, "one or two of its usual allies" within ASEAN had withdrawn support for the briefing. 3. (C) Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong made the late-night announcement flanked by glum-looking counterparts from all of the ASEAN member-countries with the notable exception of Burma. Singapore issued a statement that appeared to be an effort to reflect the range of views on Burma (see paragraph 7); it included both Burma's objections and the view of "most leaders" that Burma must begin to undertake meaningful reforms. Wong told us that although Singapore had issued the statement in its capacity as ASEAN Chair, Burma had participated in the discussion and had agreed to the draft along with the other nine members. Media reporting on the leaders' dinner also highlighted Philippines President Gloria Arroyo' warning that the Philippines might not ratify the ASEAN Charter (which all ten leaders signed November 20 -- ref B) if Burma did not free opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi and get on the "path of democracy." 4. (C) The statement said Singapore, as ASEAN Chair, would facilitate meetings for Gambari with "interested parties." MFA International Organizations Deputy Director for UN issues Gerard Ho told us that possibility was in doubt early November 20 because UN SYG Ban Ki-moon was unhappy with the ASEAN decision and was considering recalling Gambari to New York. However, Wong later told us that Gambari was in fact meeting with "interested" ASEAN foreign ministers the evening of November 20 and would be available to meet seperately with interestd EAS countries. 5. (C) Press reports indicated some ASEAN members had earlier grumbled about having Gambari brief the EAS because the EAS includes countries from outside of ASEAN. But Ho told us that the main obstacle (prior to Burma's objection) had been China, which had only agreed to an "informal" briefing of the EAS after "intense negotiations." But then Burma Prime Minister Thein Sein had "pulled the plug" during the leaders' working dinner, insisting Burma's problems were its internal affairs and that it would only cooperate with the UN. Ho told us that Burma had been successful in persuading some members that ASEAN should not allow itself to be used by SINGAPORE 00002086 002 OF 003 outside powers to pressure it. Thien Sein reportedly complained that outside countries such as the United States and Australia had continued to ratchet up the pressure even though Burma was cooperating with Gambari. 6. (C) Commenting on internal ASEAN dynamics, Ho said that only Singapore and the Philippines had taken a consistently tough line on Burma. Malaysia and Indonesia were also frustrated with Burma, but were less willing to apply pressure, while Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam were deeply uncomfortable with criticizing Burma. He also strongly suggested China had pressed ASEAN to avoid direct pressure on Burma and said some in ASEAN are unhappy with Singapore for its strong public statements. 7. (U) Following is the full text of the statement on Burma Singapore released in its capacity as ASEAN Chair. Begin text: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Singapore November 20 2007 ASEAN Chairman's statement on Myanmar The ASEAN Leaders had a full and open discussion on the Myanmar issue at their Informal Working Dinner. Prime Minister Thein Sein made clear that the situation in Myanmar was a domestic Myanmar affair and that Myanmar was fully capable of handling the situation by itself. Prime Minister Thein Sein explained that UN Secretary-General Special Advisor Ibrahim Gambari had visited Myanmar four times, and that Myanmar had implemented many of his proposals. He emphasized that Professor Gambari should only report to the UN Security Council and not to ASEAN or the East Asia Summit (EAS). Myanmar had every confidence in managing Professor Gambari's mission and the good offices of the UN. In view of Myanmar's position, Professor Gambari will not brief the ASEAN or EAS Leaders. However, Singapore, as ASEAN Chair, will facilitate Professor Gambari's meetings with interested parties. The ASEAN Leaders agreed that ASEAN would respect Myanmar's wishes and make way for Myanmar to deal directly with the UN and the International community on its own. ASEAN stands ready to play a role whenever Myanmar wants it to do so. The Leaders noted that the recent visits by Professor Gambari had resulted in several steps in the right direction. Most Leaders expressed the view that Myanmar could not go back or stay put. The process of national reconciliation had to move forward, and the UN played a vital role in this process. As had been stated in the statement issued by the ASEAN Chair in New York in September, the Leaders reiterated that the Myanmar Government should continue to work with the UN in order to: a. Open up a meaningful dialogue with Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and the National League for Democracy (NLD); b. Make full use of the good offices of the UN Secretary-General and Professor Gambari in this process; SIPDIS c. Lift restrictions on Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and release all political detainees; d. Work towards a peaceful transition to democracy; and e. Address the economic difficulties faced by the people of Myanmar. The Leaders emphasized that they will strive to prevent the Myanmar issue from obstructing ASEAN's integration efforts, especially the ASEAN Charter and the establishment of the ASEAN Community. SINGAPORE 00002086 003 OF 003 ..... 19 November 2007 END TEXT Visit Embassy Singapore's Classified website: http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eap/singapore/ind ex.cfm HERBOLD |