Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07SAOPAULO33
2007-01-16 13:10:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Consulate Sao Paulo
Cable title:  

MEDIA REACTION: IRAQ: PRESIDENT BUSH'S IRAQ SECURITY PLAN;

Tags:  KMDR OPRC OIIP ETRD BR 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0018
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHSO #0033/01 0161310
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 161310Z JAN 07
FM AMCONSUL SAO PAULO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 6277
INFO RHEHNSC/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA PRIORITY 7359
RUEHRI/AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO PRIORITY 7707
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 2679
UNCLAS SAO PAULO 000033 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

STATE INR/R/MR; IIP/R/MR; WHA/PD

DEPT PASS USTR

USDOC 4322/MAC/OLAC/JAFEE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KMDR OPRC OIIP ETRD BR
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: IRAQ: PRESIDENT BUSH'S IRAQ SECURITY PLAN;
WESTERN HEMISPHERE: ZOELLICK'S PROPOSAL, VENEZUELA, BOLIVIA,
ECUADOR; SAO PAULO


UNCLAS SAO PAULO 000033

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

STATE INR/R/MR; IIP/R/MR; WHA/PD

DEPT PASS USTR

USDOC 4322/MAC/OLAC/JAFEE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KMDR OPRC OIIP ETRD BR
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: IRAQ: PRESIDENT BUSH'S IRAQ SECURITY PLAN;
WESTERN HEMISPHERE: ZOELLICK'S PROPOSAL, VENEZUELA, BOLIVIA,
ECUADOR; SAO PAULO



1. "Is There Any Logic In Bush's 'Madness'?"

The lead editorial in center-right national circulation daily O
Estado de S. Paulo commented (1/13): "Bush has not only recognized
that he made a mistake and publicly admitted it, but he is aware
that not even with an additional 20,000 soldiers will he be able to
change the disastrous situation resulting from his mistakes. With
the plan he now proposes he would only reinforce the strategy for
the total withdrawal of the US troops in Iraq. In other words, he
does not want to admit publicly that he endorses the bipartisan plan
of gradual withdrawal of the troops - the so-called Baker Plan....
But it is the gradual withdrawal of US troops in Iraq that his plan
provides for."

2. "FTAA Without Mercosul"
National circulation center-right daily O Estado de S. Paulo
editorialized (1/15): "The US may create an FTAA without Mercosul,
thereby dividing the Americas into two blocs. One of them will
include nations with preferential access to the markets of the
world's largest economy and all advantages resulting from that, such
as the attraction of investments. The other bloc will be formed by
Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay, Venezuela and Bolivia, if the
Uruguayans and Paraguayans do not try to escape the trap. Those who
do not escape will be subject to Hugo Chvez's political whims....
The proposal for the creation of the US-led Hemispheric bloc is in
an article by USTR Robert Zoellick published a week ago by the Wall
Street Journal.... According to Zoellick, by proposing the
establishment of free-trade agreements, the USG would be responding
to rising leftist leaders in Latin America.... It is not clear
whether the article expresses just Zoellick's opinions and
suggestions or if he is disseminating ideas of a group with
political and business interests - maybe the very USG. It would not
be the first time that a former high level government official would
agree to perform such a job. But the former USTR would not invest
his time, energy and prestige in preparing a political agenda

without chances of receiving the support of most of the public
opinion. If the Democratic majority is not too busy with its
protectionist agenda, Zoellick's suggestions may result in political
developments.... There is no reference in Zoellick's article to the
South American nations that helped most to bury the FTAA project -
Brazil and Argentina under the Lula and Kirchner administrations.
These are simply out of the game proposed by Zoellick. At the
present time, he is only concerned about the populist rising
leaders, and this is understandable. They have proven to be more
capable of influencing the regional agenda, neutralizing the weight
of more economically developed nations, such as Brazil. Zoellick
shows that he knows very well the south American reality."

3. "American Union"
Steel tycoon Benjamin Steinbruch opined in liberal, largest national
circulation daily Folha de S. Paulo (1/16): "Political lighting
strikes frightening Latin America have shown how far we are from a
continental union in the Americas. Venezuela expels foreign
companies and announces a nationalization program. Bolivia
expropriates oil and gas companies. Ecuador signals that it may
follow the same path. Argentina interferes in tariff prices of
multinational companies installed in its territory and resorts to
the WTO against Brazil, in addition to dueling with Uruguay and
blocking access to its neighbor to prevent the installation of a
pulp and paper mill on their common border. The bloc of American
nations in a world where regional union is today increasingly more
important does not exist even in the imagination of continental
leaders.... Because of its leadership role, the US should pay more
attention to the neighbors in its own backyard. If it looked with
more attention and generosity to the South, Washington would see
enormous latent synergies in the Americas and invest in the idea of
building a true continental union. The synergies are many: ore, oil,
gas, agribusiness, biofuel, manufactures, services and the Amazon's
infinite biodiversity. Together, they would build a powerful and
differentiated continent.... The construction of a true American
Union demands imagination to achieve a level well beyond that
thought by the extinct FTAA, which was a mere free-trade agreement
engendered so that the US might buy cheap raw material and sell
expensive technology."

4. "Political Instability Worsens In The Neighborhood"
Business-oriented Valor Economico (1/16) editorialized: "Signs of
authoritarianism and political crises have spread through Venezuela,
Bolivia and Ecuador. The common thread of this a triple alliance of
disorder is the union between Rafael Correa, Evo Morales and Hugo
Chvez around the convenient 'Bolivarian revolution' that will help
them to adopt institutional changes of unpredictable
consequences.... There is not the slightest doubt that democracy in
those nations must be improved and that the separation of parties
from the population allowed the emergence of non-traditional


politicians with radical proposals, the most ruinous of which is the
replacement of corroded institutional structures with others even
more fragile, based on the charismatic authoritarianism of salvation
leaders." McMullen