Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07SAOPAULO119
2007-02-14 12:55:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Consulate Sao Paulo
Cable title:  

ICMS Tax Benefits Issue: Financial Concerns for U.S.

Tags:  EINV ETRD ECON PGOV KJUS BR 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO7596
RR RUEHRG
DE RUEHSO #0119/01 0451255
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 141255Z FEB 07
FM AMCONSUL SAO PAULO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6421
INFO RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 7514
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 2707
RUEHMN/AMEMBASSY MONTEVIDEO 2269
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES 2636
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 1984
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ 3222
RUEHPE/AMEMBASSY LIMA 1101
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 0444
RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA 1492
RUEHRG/AMCONSUL RECIFE 3369
RUEHRI/AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO 7783
RUEHAC/AMEMBASSY ASUNCION 2926
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHDC
RUEAWJC/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 SAO PAULO 000119 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DEPT FOR WHA/BSC, WHA/EPSC, WHA/PDA, AND EB/CBA
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR MSULLIVAN
STATE PASS EXIMBANK
STATE PASS OPIC FOR MORONESE, RIVERA, MERVENNE
NSC FOR FEARS
USDOC FOR 4332/ITA/MAC/OLAC
USDOC FOR 3134/USFCS/OIO
TREASURY FOR OASIA, DAS LEE AND JHOEK
DOJ FOR CMERRIAM
AID/W FOR LAC/AA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EINV ETRD ECON PGOV KJUS BR
SUBJECT: ICMS Tax Benefits Issue: Financial Concerns for U.S.
companies, Sao Paulo State and Brazil

REF: (A) SAO PAULO 36; (B) 06 SAO PAULO 675

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED; PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY

Summary
-------

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 SAO PAULO 000119

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DEPT FOR WHA/BSC, WHA/EPSC, WHA/PDA, AND EB/CBA
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR MSULLIVAN
STATE PASS EXIMBANK
STATE PASS OPIC FOR MORONESE, RIVERA, MERVENNE
NSC FOR FEARS
USDOC FOR 4332/ITA/MAC/OLAC
USDOC FOR 3134/USFCS/OIO
TREASURY FOR OASIA, DAS LEE AND JHOEK
DOJ FOR CMERRIAM
AID/W FOR LAC/AA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EINV ETRD ECON PGOV KJUS BR
SUBJECT: ICMS Tax Benefits Issue: Financial Concerns for U.S.
companies, Sao Paulo State and Brazil

REF: (A) SAO PAULO 36; (B) 06 SAO PAULO 675

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED; PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY

Summary
--------------


1. (SBU) Consul General convened representatives of US and Brazilian
companies at ConGen Sao Paulo on January 19 to discuss ongoing
issues associated with tax benefits (ICMS - rough VAT equivalent
collected at the state level) granted by the Sao Paulo state
government. Motorola and other electronics exporting companies have
received ICMS tax benefits, which has encouraged investment in the
state. Similar incentives have been granted by other states to
various industry sectors, generating "tax wars" and resulting in
lawsuits between states. Parana state had filed a suit against Sao
Paulo state in 2001, arguing that the granting of tax incentives
without the agreement of all the other states violated the Brazilian
Constitution. The case was scheduled to be ruled upon by the
Supreme Court (STF) on February 2. If the decision were to go
against Sao Paulo, the decree governing the tax incentives could
have been declared unconstitutional, resulting in the cancellation
of the benefits with the possibility of retroactive tax liabilities
for the companies. This would represent a loss of hundreds of
millions of dollars and jeopardize the continued presence in Sao
Paulo of a number of companies, as well as the plans of at least one
company to move its operations to the state. Rather than risk this
outcome, Sao Paulo state governor Serra, responding in part to
concerns raised by Ambassador Sobel and ConGen Sao Paulo, revoked
the existing state decree on January 30 in a legal maneuver to
vacate the existing lawsuit. Sao Paulo state intends to replace it
in the next fifteen days with a new decree retroactively granting

U.S. and other companies identical benefits. ConGen and the Embassy
plan to work with U.S. companies, the Sao Paulo government and the
federal government to encourage a long-term solution to the ICMS
quandary. End Summary.

Background
--------------


2. (U) In order to develop and maintain industrial capacity
manufacture and create greater investment in Brazil, many states
have offered tax incentives to companies investing and operating in
the state. These take the form of credits to exporters on the state
Tax on the Circulation of Merchandise and Services (ICMS - VAT
equivalent administered and collected by state governments). Sao
Paulo state, as one of Brazil's major industrial centers,
representing 31 percent of Brazil's GDP, also has offered such
incentives. However, the rivalry between states has led to "tax
wars," and frequent lawsuits. The Sao Paulo state government has
adopted the legal tactic, once an unfavorable court ruling is nigh,
of revoking the decree governing the tax credits and then
immediately issuing a new one. This results in the vacating of the
lawsuit against the old law but allows companies to continue to
receive their tax credits. However, as the legal action of Parana
vs. Sao Paulo concerning ICMS credits for electronics manufacturers
made its way to the Supreme Court, companies became increasingly
concerned that this tactic was not providing a durable solution to
the continuing threat of adverse rulings and the possible loss of
hundreds of millions of dollars. For this reason, they requested
the USG's assistance in encouraging the new Governor to work on a
more durable, long-term solution.


SAO PAULO 00000119 002.5 OF 004


ICMS Tax Benefits: The Need for a Permanent Solution
-------------- --------------


3. (U) ConGen hosted a series of meetings with affected companies
to discuss issues surrounding state ICMS benefits. Initially,
Motorola had approached the Consul General (CG) and the Ambassador
to express their concerns. On January 19th, CG convened a second
meeting that included additional companies and industry
representatives facing this same problem. Brazilian and U.S.
companies, including Motorola, Flextronics, Dell, and Hewlett
Packard, along with representatives of the electronics trade
association ABINEE, Amcham and the state Federation of Industries
(FIESP),met with with the CG, Econ/Pol, and FCS.


4. (U) All in attendance at this meeting, which took place before
Governor Serra revoked the old tax benefit legislation, agreed that
even if the tax issue is resolved temporarily, as it has been in the
past, there needs to be a longer term solution to the problem. The
companies cannot continue to operate in a climate of instability and
uncertainty; they have other options in terms of investment, such as
India, China and Mexico. Sao Paulo state is particularly affected,
as a large number of U.S. and other companies that employ thousands
of people are based here. These companies depend on ICMS credits to
make their operations viable. For example, Dell had decided to
relocate from Rio Grande do Sul to Sao Paulo specifically because of
the ICMS benefits. Otherwise, the costs of production and problems
with security would weigh against investing in Sao Paulo.
Ultimately, there needs to be a long term solution.


5. (U) It was resolved that ABINEE, the electronics trade
association, would take the lead and coordinate efforts to bring
about a resolution. In addition to approaching the state and
federal governments, ABINEE decided to seek the support of CONFAZ,
the National Council for Fiscal Policy. CONFAZ is an organization
comprising the Secretaries of Finance of all 27 states; its members
discuss important federal and state fiscal matters. Created to
allow the federal government and state tax authorities to jointly
manage ICMS, CONFAZ is perhaps the best vehicle to begin to tackle
the ICMS problem. ABINEE met recently with Sao Paulo Finance
Secretary Mauro Ricardo Machado Costa and several members of

SIPDIS
Brazil's Congress to emphasize the importance of resolving this
issue.

Meetings with the Ambassador: Weighing in on the Issue
-------------- --------------


6. (U) In an effort to assist in resolving this issue, Ambassador
Sobel raised the ICMS benefits problem in a January 10 meeting with
Governor Serra in Sao Paulo (ref A) and later with Minister of
Development, Industry, and Foreign Trade Luiz Fernando Furlan in
Brasilia. Minister Furlan responded that this was a state issue
and had to be resolved among the governors. Governor Serra, for
his part, gave assurances that he would revoke the tax incentives
and then reinstate them.

Sao Paulo State: Concerns, Actions, and Future Plans
-------------- --------------


7. (U) On January 30, the decree governing the ICMS credits was
officially revoked by the Sao Paulo state government. After the
revocation, industry and ConGen took action on two fronts: 1)
ABINEE convened a meeting of all concerned companies that day to
meet and draft recommended language for the new decree, which they

SAO PAULO 00000119 003 OF 004


will submit to the state government, and 2) on the following day, CG
met with Vice Governor Alberto Goldman to discuss the revocation and
future actions of the state government to resolve the ICMS issue.
Responding to the CG's concerns about the impact of this issue on
U.S. companies, Goldman reiterated the government's intention to
issue a new decree restoring the credits within 15 days. The 15-day
waiting period, Goldman explained, was not required by law but
rather was based on "public image" concerns. Goldman implied that
an immediate turnaround would not be viewed in a positive light by
the Supreme Court; for the sake of appearances, it was better to
allow a decent interval before issuing a replacement decree.
Although it was not clear whether the companies would be able to
re-coup revenue losses incurred during this 15-day period, Goldman
suggested that such losses would not be too detrimental since they
would be shared equally throughout the sector. He was aware that a
new decree will be only a temporary solution and agreed on the
urgent need to find a longer term solution. He also confirmed that
the state government has created an internal working group to
develop a proposal for a permanent solution, which he hopes to
present to the federal government in the next three months.


8. (SBU) Goldman is confident that the states will reach a solution
to these "tax wars," as he considers Sao Paulo State to be the
"heavy hitter" in the war, and the most influential state in
negotiating a modus vivendi with the others. "We don't want to
fight a war, we want to find a peaceful solution everyone can live
with," Goldman said. "If we go to war, everybody loses. But if it
does come to that, we have the ammunition and will win." He is also
of the opinion that this early stage in President Lula's second
administration offers an opportune moment to find a solution,
implying that if there is a long delay in resolving the problem, the
chances for reaching a successful conclusion would diminish. He
also considers that CONFAZ could be a major player in resolving this
issue, as a solution reached by this organization would motivate the
GOB to enter into serious talks to resolve the issue. Goldman
suggested that Ambassador Sobel could talk with Minister Furlan and
Finance Minister Guido Mantega, and with Lula's Chief of Staff,
Dilma Rousseff. Another opportunity to resolve the issue would be
to approach Governors from the major states involved.

COMMENT
--------------


9. (SBU) Comment: At present, all the companies are waiting for
the re-issuance of the new tax benefits decree, which they hope will
include some of their input. Upon re-issuance, the ICMS tax
benefits issue will be temporarily resolved, but a permanent
solution is necessary to create a stable financial climate for
present and future business investment. Based on our meetings with
Governor Serra and Vice-Governor Goldman, we believe Sao Paulo state
understands what is at stake and is committed to resolving the
issue, which represents hundreds of millions of dollars to the
companies, and affects future investment in the state. After years
of tax wars, revocations, and re-issuances, it appears that the Sao
Paulo government is ready to roll up its collective sleeves and
attempt to tackle this problem, and hopes to carry the rest of
Brazil along with it. Prospects for Sao Paulo state carrying the
day on the issue, however, are not at all clear. It is likely that
any reform of the ICMS system, which necessarily raises a host of
thorny fiscal federalism issues, will require clear federal
government leadership in the Confaz and in the federal congress.
The last serious attempt to reform the ICMS system, an ambitious
effort that incidentally would have grandfathered and frozen

SAO PAULO 00000119 004 OF 004


existing tax breaks to companies, was roundly defeated in 2004 as
many states proved unable or unwilling to compromise on changes to
the tax that is their main source of income. End Comment.



12. (U) This cable was coordinated with Embassy Brasilia.

McMullen