Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07ROME1945
2007-09-12 11:52:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Rome
Cable title:
ITALY PRIVATELY FAVORS ICAO AVIATION EMISSIONS
how-toVZCZCXRO5200 PP RUEHPOD DE RUEHRO #1945/01 2551152 ZNR UUUUU ZZH P 121152Z SEP 07 FM AMEMBASSY ROME TO RUCNMEU/EU INTEREST COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS PRIORITY 1724 RUEHMT/AMCONSUL MONTREAL PRIORITY 0140 RULSDMK/DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHDC PRIORITY RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY 4559 RHMCSUU/FAA NATIONAL HQ WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RHMFIUU/TSA HQ WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY INFO RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN PRIORITY 1786 RUEHLI/AMEMBASSY LISBON PRIORITY 0490 RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID PRIORITY 1823 RUEHFL/AMCONSUL FLORENCE PRIORITY 2612 RUEHMIL/AMCONSUL MILAN PRIORITY 8922 RUEHNP/AMCONSUL NAPLES PRIORITY 2748
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ROME 001945
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
USEU PASS FOR T SMITHAM
BRUSSELS PASS FOR FAA K EDWARDS
STATE PASS FOR IO/T AND EB/TRA
MONTREAL PASS FOR US MISSION TO ICAO
FAA PASS FOR J FILIPPATOS, D REIMOLD, C BURLESON
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAIR SENV ECON ETRD XA XB XD XF XG XL IT
SUBJECT: ITALY PRIVATELY FAVORS ICAO AVIATION EMISSIONS
SCHEME--WITH STRINGS
REF: A. ROME 1600
B. SECSTATE 77572
ROME 00001945 001.2 OF 002
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ROME 001945
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
USEU PASS FOR T SMITHAM
BRUSSELS PASS FOR FAA K EDWARDS
STATE PASS FOR IO/T AND EB/TRA
MONTREAL PASS FOR US MISSION TO ICAO
FAA PASS FOR J FILIPPATOS, D REIMOLD, C BURLESON
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAIR SENV ECON ETRD XA XB XD XF XG XL IT
SUBJECT: ITALY PRIVATELY FAVORS ICAO AVIATION EMISSIONS
SCHEME--WITH STRINGS
REF: A. ROME 1600
B. SECSTATE 77572
ROME 00001945 001.2 OF 002
1. (SBU) SUMMARY: Government of Italy (GOI) representatives
recently indicated unofficially that Italy would prefer a
global aviation emissions solution rather than the EU
Commission's proposed Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). GOI
MFA comments suggest that, with a commitment to global and
binding emissions standards by all ICAO participants, Italy
would support an agreement that would supersede the proposed
ETS. Our interlocutors reiterated that in the interim, as an
EU member, Italy must support the ETS. Neither of our
contacts articulated what a new aviation emissions plan would
look like, but it is likely that the GOI would advocate for
rigorous environmental measures in any plan. END SUMMARY
2. (SBU) Fabio Marchiandi, Head of the International
Relations Office at ENAC (the Italian Civil Aviation
Authority),told Emboffs privately that Italy would like a
"softer" position on emissions than that proposed in the EU
ETS directive, and would like a global solution to aviation
emissions developed and executed within the ICAO context. He
did not articulate what a softer aviation emissions position
would entail. COMMENT: Presumably a global or broad-based
ICAO mechanism would be the result of negotiated compromise
between the EU and other countries. END COMMENT.
3. (SBU) Marchiandi disclosed that, as a way to achieve this
softer position, Italy and other European countries are
attempting to replace Germany with Portugal on the informal
ICAO "Friends of the (ICAO) President" (F.O.P.) group.
According to Marchiandi, Portugal, like Italy, is less ardent
in its support for the ETS than Germany. The GOI's hope is
that a newly-reconstituted F.O.P. group would influence the
ICAO President and the Assembly to discuss aviation emissions
and work to find a solution within the ICAO context.
COMMENT: The U.K. and Germany currently represent Europe in
the F.O.P. group. The F.O.P. group has not addressed
environmental matters before. END COMMENT.
4. (SBU) Stefano Nicoletti, Head of MFA's office that covers
transportation issues, unofficially confirmed the GOI's
preference for ICAO as the locus of civil aviation policy,
and the GOI's preference for a global, rather than solely
European, aviation emissions plan. Nicoletti said that the
GOI would support an ICAO aviation emissions initiative
instead of the ETS if ICAO demonstrates a commitment to deal
effectively with the problem. For the GOI, key elements of
such a commitment would include an ICAO-wide acknowledgment
of the aviation emissions problem, and a clearly stated
objective to develop a global and binding solution with a
timetable for implementation. A further sign of ICAO's
seriousness would be designating a committee to address the
issue, perhaps ICAO's Committee on Aviation Environmental
Protection (CAEP). Nicoletti underlined Italy's interest in
being part of such a group.
5. (SBU) With these conditions, Nicoletti said privately
that Italy could commit to acting as a mediator to find a
compromise between the EU ETS and a plan more acceptable to
the rest of the world. Nicoletti suggested that other
European countries would be interested in this plan also, but
he did not identify them (NOTE: As reported in ref A, these
countries may be Spain and Portugal. END NOTE). Neither
could he identify what form the basis for a revised agreement
might take or how the GOI would approach the EU to revise
ETS.
6. (SBU) COMMENT: From these remarks, it is clear that the
GOI does not fully support the EU position on aviation
emissions in the proposed ETS; Italy could, therefore, be
helpful in efforts to shift the aviation emissions discussion
to ICAO. However, both Marchiandi and Nicoletti emphasized
ROME 00001945 002.2 OF 002
that the decision to implement the ETS is a political one at
the European Commission level, and has considerable momentum.
Both stated that Italy must publicly support the EU plan.
Finally, it is important to remember that while Italy may not
be enthusiastic about the ETS plan as currently formulated,
the GOI would likely call for stringent measures in any
aviation emissions scheme, be it ICAO- or EU-based (ref A,
comments by R Cecchi). END COMMENT
SPOGLI
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
USEU PASS FOR T SMITHAM
BRUSSELS PASS FOR FAA K EDWARDS
STATE PASS FOR IO/T AND EB/TRA
MONTREAL PASS FOR US MISSION TO ICAO
FAA PASS FOR J FILIPPATOS, D REIMOLD, C BURLESON
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAIR SENV ECON ETRD XA XB XD XF XG XL IT
SUBJECT: ITALY PRIVATELY FAVORS ICAO AVIATION EMISSIONS
SCHEME--WITH STRINGS
REF: A. ROME 1600
B. SECSTATE 77572
ROME 00001945 001.2 OF 002
1. (SBU) SUMMARY: Government of Italy (GOI) representatives
recently indicated unofficially that Italy would prefer a
global aviation emissions solution rather than the EU
Commission's proposed Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). GOI
MFA comments suggest that, with a commitment to global and
binding emissions standards by all ICAO participants, Italy
would support an agreement that would supersede the proposed
ETS. Our interlocutors reiterated that in the interim, as an
EU member, Italy must support the ETS. Neither of our
contacts articulated what a new aviation emissions plan would
look like, but it is likely that the GOI would advocate for
rigorous environmental measures in any plan. END SUMMARY
2. (SBU) Fabio Marchiandi, Head of the International
Relations Office at ENAC (the Italian Civil Aviation
Authority),told Emboffs privately that Italy would like a
"softer" position on emissions than that proposed in the EU
ETS directive, and would like a global solution to aviation
emissions developed and executed within the ICAO context. He
did not articulate what a softer aviation emissions position
would entail. COMMENT: Presumably a global or broad-based
ICAO mechanism would be the result of negotiated compromise
between the EU and other countries. END COMMENT.
3. (SBU) Marchiandi disclosed that, as a way to achieve this
softer position, Italy and other European countries are
attempting to replace Germany with Portugal on the informal
ICAO "Friends of the (ICAO) President" (F.O.P.) group.
According to Marchiandi, Portugal, like Italy, is less ardent
in its support for the ETS than Germany. The GOI's hope is
that a newly-reconstituted F.O.P. group would influence the
ICAO President and the Assembly to discuss aviation emissions
and work to find a solution within the ICAO context.
COMMENT: The U.K. and Germany currently represent Europe in
the F.O.P. group. The F.O.P. group has not addressed
environmental matters before. END COMMENT.
4. (SBU) Stefano Nicoletti, Head of MFA's office that covers
transportation issues, unofficially confirmed the GOI's
preference for ICAO as the locus of civil aviation policy,
and the GOI's preference for a global, rather than solely
European, aviation emissions plan. Nicoletti said that the
GOI would support an ICAO aviation emissions initiative
instead of the ETS if ICAO demonstrates a commitment to deal
effectively with the problem. For the GOI, key elements of
such a commitment would include an ICAO-wide acknowledgment
of the aviation emissions problem, and a clearly stated
objective to develop a global and binding solution with a
timetable for implementation. A further sign of ICAO's
seriousness would be designating a committee to address the
issue, perhaps ICAO's Committee on Aviation Environmental
Protection (CAEP). Nicoletti underlined Italy's interest in
being part of such a group.
5. (SBU) With these conditions, Nicoletti said privately
that Italy could commit to acting as a mediator to find a
compromise between the EU ETS and a plan more acceptable to
the rest of the world. Nicoletti suggested that other
European countries would be interested in this plan also, but
he did not identify them (NOTE: As reported in ref A, these
countries may be Spain and Portugal. END NOTE). Neither
could he identify what form the basis for a revised agreement
might take or how the GOI would approach the EU to revise
ETS.
6. (SBU) COMMENT: From these remarks, it is clear that the
GOI does not fully support the EU position on aviation
emissions in the proposed ETS; Italy could, therefore, be
helpful in efforts to shift the aviation emissions discussion
to ICAO. However, both Marchiandi and Nicoletti emphasized
ROME 00001945 002.2 OF 002
that the decision to implement the ETS is a political one at
the European Commission level, and has considerable momentum.
Both stated that Italy must publicly support the EU plan.
Finally, it is important to remember that while Italy may not
be enthusiastic about the ETS plan as currently formulated,
the GOI would likely call for stringent measures in any
aviation emissions scheme, be it ICAO- or EU-based (ref A,
comments by R Cecchi). END COMMENT
SPOGLI