Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07REYKJAVIK1
2007-01-05 09:10:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Reykjavik
Cable title:  

Iceland: Defense Bilats with NATO Allies Reflect Maturing

Tags:  MARR PREL PTER NATO DK IC NO 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO0412
RR RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDBU RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA
RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHRK #0001/01 0050910
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 050910Z JAN 07
FM AMEMBASSY REYKJAVIK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3111
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE 0046
RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 REYKJAVIK 000001 

SIPDIS

C O R R E C T E D C O P Y (text para 7 AND TAGS)

SENSITIVE

SIPDIS

SECDEF FOR OSD/P (KELSO, HURSCH),OSD/RA (COSTA)
OSLO FOR DATT
EUCOM FOR COL FRANKLIN AND LTC GREEN

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: MARR PREL PTER NATO DK IC NO
SUBJECT: Iceland: Defense Bilats with NATO Allies Reflect Maturing
Icelandic Approach to Security Cooperation

Ref: 06 Reykjavik 431

REYKJAVIK 00000001 001.2 OF 002


UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 REYKJAVIK 000001

SIPDIS

C O R R E C T E D C O P Y (text para 7 AND TAGS)

SENSITIVE

SIPDIS

SECDEF FOR OSD/P (KELSO, HURSCH),OSD/RA (COSTA)
OSLO FOR DATT
EUCOM FOR COL FRANKLIN AND LTC GREEN

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: MARR PREL PTER NATO DK IC NO
SUBJECT: Iceland: Defense Bilats with NATO Allies Reflect Maturing
Icelandic Approach to Security Cooperation

Ref: 06 Reykjavik 431

REYKJAVIK 00000001 001.2 OF 002



1. (U) Summary: Following the closure of U.S. Naval Air Station
Keflavik in September 2006, the Government of Iceland has begun
reaching out to other NATO allies to solicit interest in security
cooperation - and demonstrate to the public, in an election year,
that it will protect them. December 2006 visits of an Icelandic
delegation to Denmark and a Norwegian delegation to Iceland produced
no agreements (nor were they expected to),but set the stage for
follow-on talks in late January/early February. The GOI has also
announced plans for exploratory talks with Canada and Britain in
early 2007.


2. (U) Reflecting a growing realization within the Government that
Iceland will find it easier to encourage allied cooperation in the
North Atlantic if Reykjavik increases its own contributions to the
Alliance, Iceland will start contributing to the NATO Infrastructure
Fund in 2007. Increasingly, leading media and other opinion makers
seem prepared to accept that Iceland can and should contribute to
its own defense and to Alliance operations both in and out of area.
End summary.


3. (U) In the months since the September 2006 closure of Naval Air
Station Keflavik (NASKEF),the Government of Iceland has made
overtures to several NATO allies regarding security cooperation in
the North Atlantic. Most substantively, the GOI has begun a process
of bilateral talks with Denmark and Norway regarding cooperation on
air defense/surveillance exercises, search and rescue, and maritime
patrol. In its public discussion of the issue, the GOI has tied its
long-standing desire for visible air defense to forecasts of rising
maritime traffic in the next few years, and arguing that this
creates an increased need for multilateral security engagement in
the region.


4. (SBU) Danish and Icelandic delegations met in Copenhagen on
December 18 for a first set of talks, and set a follow-on date for

February in Reykjavik. The Icelandic delegation consisted of the
"Committee of Three" that has policy coordination responsibility for
defense and security issues: the Prime Minister's Foreign Affairs
Advisor, the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs
(MFA),and the Head of Police and Justice Affairs at the Ministry of
Justice (MOJ).


5. (SBU) Generally positive press reports quoted both sides'
assurances of further cooperation, while FM Sverrisdottir said the
meeting had been more positive than she anticipated. News reports
further indicated that Icelandic-Danish cooperation would seek to
build on existing Coast Guard and Naval patrols of the countries'
economic zones and collaboration in search and rescue. A Danish
source confirmed that the talks had indeed gone quite well, and that
the follow-up talks in February would be more extensive.
Additionally, he noted that in a separate but related initiative,
Denmark's Minister of Defense will arrive in Reykjavik on January 10
for the signing of a long-planned Memorandum of Understanding on
security cooperation with the Icelandic MOJ.


6. (U) From December 19-20, a Norwegian delegation of Ministry of
Defense and MFA representatives came to Iceland, first for talks at
the MFA and subsequently for a tour of facilities at the former
NASKEF site. Post facilitated the tour by providing an escort and
access to NATO-owned facilities at the site (facilities for which
the U.S. still holds the keys and pays the bills as NATO host
nation) and a briefing by Embassy's resident EUCOM MilRep. In a
pre-visit press article as well as press statements while the
delegation was in Reykjavik, Norwegian officials said that the
Norwegian government is looking towards Iceland for cooperation in
order to step up its security on important shipping routes in the
area.


7. (SBU) Iceland has also looked to start similar discussions with
the U.K. and Canada. MFA PermSec Gretar Mar Sigurdsson told the
press in December that an Icelandic delegation will meet with
officials in London January 16. A British source confirmed that the
"Committee of Three" will have talks at the Foreign and Commonwealth
Office and the Prime Minister's Office, adding that the GOI was
unrealistically raising public expectations of the level of British
interest. Similarly, Canadian and other sources tell us that the
GOI's reports of "defense talks" with Canada reflect nothing more
than a planned visit by the Canadian Defense Attache in Oslo, though
Iceland hopes for more to follow.


8. (SBU) Throughout the newest round of consultations, the GOI has
been at pains to say that Iceland is not requesting permanent
stationing of military forces in Iceland, nor is it asking other

REYKJAVIK 00000001 002.2 OF 002


states to initiate any new financial or resource commitments
vis-a-vis Iceland (i.e., "replacing the Americans"). Officials at
both the MFA and Prime Minister's office told post they hoped these
moves would complement but not replace the post-NASKEF security ties
Iceland and the U.S. are building, a line that the MFA's PermSec has
taken publicly as well.


9. (U) The GOI also now seems to be interested in contributing more
to NATO in the hopes of getting more out of the Alliance. On
December 18 conservative, generally pro-GOI Morgunbladid reported
(and applauded) that Iceland recently became a party to the NATO
Infrastructure Fund and will start making payments to it in 2007.
The payments will start at a modest $31,500 per year, rising to
$408,000/yr in 2016. Morgunbladid went so far as to urge the
Government to begin paying the full amount this year. A few voices
- including the center-right, but more populist daily Bladid - have
grumbled that Iceland should not be required to pay other allies for
defense, but these appear to be outliers to a growing consensus that
Iceland should contribute to its own security.


10. (SBU) Comment: These first efforts at reaching out to the
allies come in the wake of prominent local news reports that FM
Sverrisdottir had arranged for bilateral talks with Denmark, Norway,
Britain, and Canada when she attended November's NATO summit in
Riga. Many here expressed doubt that those countries were as
interested in discussing security cooperation with Iceland as the FM
made them out to be - putting heat on the GOI to deliver some
bilats, potentially opening itself to further charges of
exaggeration if nothing concrete emerges.


11. (SBU) This backdrop should not distract from the important
development that the GOI appears to have crossed a crucial line in
thinking about defense as a multilateral cooperative endeavor in
which Iceland should be a partner, rather than as something that the
Americans (or other allies) should be expected to provide at no
cost. A key test of this assertion will be the extent to which
Iceland agrees to provide support (e.g. billeting, fuel, Search and
Rescue services) to U.S. or other forces contemplating exercises in
and around Iceland.


12. (SBU) It is also indicative of more mature thinking on security
in Iceland outside the halls of government that key opinion leaders
are welcoming Iceland's participation in its own defense by
contributing to the NATO Infrastructure Fund, and actively looking
for international partners for search and rescue operations and air
surveillance during peacetime. Iceland's commitment (reftel) to
maintaining its contribution to peacekeeping in Afghanistan, Sri
Lanka, and other hot spots - even as it seeks roles appropriate to a
nation with no military forces or tradition - is a further
reflection of Icelanders' reluctant but growing acceptance that (to
paraphrase Trotsky) they may not be interested in war, but war is
interested in them.

KOSNETT