Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07RANGOON897
2007-09-18 09:28:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Rangoon
Cable title:  

GOB DEFENDS PUNISHMENT OF SIX LABOR ACTIVISTS

Tags:  ELAB PGOV PREL PHUM BM 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO0281
OO RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHNH
DE RUEHGO #0897/01 2610928
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 180928Z SEP 07
FM AMEMBASSY RANGOON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 6540
INFO RUCNASE/ASEAN MEMBER COLLECTIVE
RUEHGG/UN SECURITY COUNCIL COLLECTIVE
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 0521
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 4053
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 7611
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 5168
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 3302
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0957
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 RANGOON 000897 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP, IO AND DRL
PACOM FOR FPA
US MISSION GENEVA FOR LABOR ATTACHE

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/18/2017
TAGS: ELAB PGOV PREL PHUM BM
SUBJECT: GOB DEFENDS PUNISHMENT OF SIX LABOR ACTIVISTS

REF: A. RANGOON 853

B. RANGOON 721

Classified By: Economic Officer Samantha A. Carl-Yoder for reasons 1.4
(b and d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 RANGOON 000897

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP, IO AND DRL
PACOM FOR FPA
US MISSION GENEVA FOR LABOR ATTACHE

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/18/2017
TAGS: ELAB PGOV PREL PHUM BM
SUBJECT: GOB DEFENDS PUNISHMENT OF SIX LABOR ACTIVISTS

REF: A. RANGOON 853

B. RANGOON 721

Classified By: Economic Officer Samantha A. Carl-Yoder for reasons 1.4
(b and d)


1. (C) Summary. In a meeting with ILO Liaison Officer
Steve Marshall, the Minister of Labor defended the September
7 conviction of six labor activists for their affiliation
with a May 1 labor workshop at the American Center. He
denounced claims that the six were being punished for filing
forced labor cases with the ILO and asserted that the GOB had
"strong evidence" linking the six to the Burma Free Trade
Union (FTUB),a Burmese government-designated terrorist
organization. While the Minister of Labor warned Marshall
that his interest in the case was outside the mandate of the
ILO, Marshall said that the case involved freedom of
association principles, which are followed by the ILO. He
also warned that the ILO will likely call on the GOB to
explain this case at the November ILO Governing Body meeting.
End Summary.

Claiming Terrorist Links
--------------


2. (C) On September 7, the Burmese courts convicted six
labor activists arrested in connection with a May 1 labor
seminar at the American Center of sedition and immigration
violations under 124(a) of the Penal Code. They were
sentenced to prison terms of between 20 and 28 years (Ref
A). The ILO office in Geneva, concerned that the GOB was
unfairly targeting these individuals due to their
relationship with the ILO, issued a press release on
September 12 calling for the immediate release of the six
activists. According to the ILO statement, the severe
sentence was "unwarranted and can harm the few processes of
engagement that exist."


3. (C) Upset about the above statement, the Burmese
Minister of Labor met with ILO Liaison Officer Steve Marshall
on September 17 to defend the court's decision to convict the
activists. The Minister emphasized that the cases had
nothing to do with forced labor, May Day, or freedom of

association; rather, the court convicted the six individuals
based on "strong evidence" linking them to the Burma Free
Trade Union (FTUB),a government-designated terrorist group.
The GOB had been monitoring their activities for months, the
Minister explained, and had information that they received
funds from the FTUB to undermine the government. The
sedition charges are valid, he asserted, and the immigration
charges stem from their clandestine meetings and
communications with individuals living outside of Burma. The
Minister also declared that Marshall was acting outside of
the ILO mandate, since the cases were not related to forced
labor.


4. (C) Marshall requested court transcripts, and warned
that the GOB needed to be aware of public perceptions. The
police arrested the four of the six individuals on May Day,
outside of the American Center, he stressed. The timing of
the arrests is suspect, and the ILO wants to ensure
transparency in the legal process. ILO interest in the case
is two-fold: while the case may not involve forced labor, it
involves freedom of association principles, which are upheld
by the ILO. Additionally, the FTUB is a member of the
International Confederation of Trade Unions, which is under
the umbrella of the ILO. Marshall warned that this case will
not go away quickly, and may be on the agenda at the November
ILO Governing Body meeting.


5. (C) The Minister responded that the GOB continues to
uphold the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right
to Organize Convention. He pointed out that the Convention
defers to local law. Association with an illegal terrorist
organization constitutes sedition under Burmese law, he
emphasized, and thus their conviction for cavorting with the

RANGOON 00000897 002 OF 002


FTUB does not violate the Convention. The Minister then
mentioned that several hundred Americans were arrested in
front of the U.S. Congress for protesting the Iraq war and
inquired whether the ILO is taking an interest in that case.
"There is no difference between the American Government's
action and ours. Why are we being penalized?" he asked.


6. (C) The families of the activists told Marshall that they
would appeal the decision within 60 days. Marshall advised
the Minister of Labor not to wait for the imminent appeal,
and recommended that the higher authorities review the case
to ensure the courts made the right decision and did not
violate the Freedom of Association and Protection of the
Right to Organize Convention. The Labor Minister noted the
advice and said he would take the case to "appropriate
authorities."

Comment
--------------


7. (C) The GOB has tried to hype the reestablishment of a
mechanism to investigate forced labor complaints as evidence
that they are working cooperatively with the ILO. The secret
trials and long sentences handed out to the labor activists
do violate a core labor principle. Burma should be
criticized for their actions at the next Governing Body
meeting. The GOB needs to be reminded that they do not make
the rules for international organizations. They have taken
on commitments and violated them.

VILLAROSA