Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07PHNOMPENH197
2007-02-02 10:21:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Phnom Penh
Cable title:  

CAMBODIA'S BILATERAL DEBT: INTEREST RATE MAY STILL

Tags:  EFIN PREL ECON CB 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO6157
OO RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHNH
DE RUEHPF #0197 0331021
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 021021Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY PHNOM PENH
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 7970
INFO RUCNASE/ASEAN MEMBER COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 3131
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY 0645
UNCLAS PHNOM PENH 000197 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/MLS, EB/IFD/OMA
TREASURY FOR ANDREW JEWELL

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EFIN PREL ECON CB
SUBJECT: CAMBODIA'S BILATERAL DEBT: INTEREST RATE MAY STILL
BE AN ISSUE

REF: A. A) PHNOM PENH 109


B. B) PHNOM PENH 62

UNCLAS PHNOM PENH 000197

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/MLS, EB/IFD/OMA
TREASURY FOR ANDREW JEWELL

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EFIN PREL ECON CB
SUBJECT: CAMBODIA'S BILATERAL DEBT: INTEREST RATE MAY STILL
BE AN ISSUE

REF: A. A) PHNOM PENH 109


B. B) PHNOM PENH 62


1. (SBU) On January 31, Pol/Econ Chief met with Ministry
of Finance Secretary General Vongsey Vissoth regarding the
US-Cambodian bilateral debt, and the Prime Minister's
response to EAP PDAS Stephens' request that the RGC sign the
draft bilateral agreement provided to the Cambodian
government last summer. The PM responded (reftel A) that
while the USG and RGC were close to an agreement, he
recommended further negotiation before an agreement could be
signed, but did not specify what remaining issues might
require additional discussion. P/E Chief updated Vissoth on
the exchange between the PM and PDAS Stephens, and requested
that the MEF official clarify the RGC position.


2. (SBU) Vissoth said he was aware of the meeting and the
discussion on bilateral debt, but was not privy to the PM's
thinking. Vissoth opined that the interest rate of 3% was
too high, and that Cambodia required a concessional rate
lower than the USG proposal. P/E Chief noted that the issue
of the interest rate had been debated and discussed during
the negotiations over the calculation of the overall debt,
and there was no further flexibility on the USG side. If the
RGC wished to table a specific proposal and respond to the
draft agreement, the Embassy would forward the proposal to
Washington, but P/E Chief warned that the U.S. side had
indicated very clearly that the USG offer submitted last year
represented the USG bottom line. P/E Chief reminded the MEF
official that the USG had eliminated roughly USD 100 million
due to faulty or lost documentation, which represented a
considerable concession on the part of the U.S. side.


3. (SBU) Vissoth agreed, but again reiterated that the
terms requested by the USG were very tough. The interest
rate of 3%, Vissoth argued, was not concessional. Further,
the National Assembly's budgetary law dictated that the
government could only take out loans at concessional rates,
and the PLO-480 agreements from 1972-74 that form the basis
of the bilateral debt were not in conformity with that
principle. Any decision to sign the bilateral debt agreement
and accept a 3% interest rate would depend on the RGC taking
up the issue with the National Assembly. P/E Chief responded
that the Lon Nol-era loans preceded current RGC budgetary
legislation dealing with interest rates -- concessional or
otherwise -- and therefore an approach to the National
Assembly should not be necessary. Vissoth said that he
understood any interest rate less than 3% would require U.S.
congressional approval. P/E Chief noted that Vissoth's
assertion was correct, and that Washington interagency
agreement to seek such approval would be highly unlikely, as
the Embassy and Washington negotiators have repeatedly told
the RGC. P/E Chief urged Vissoth to respond positively to
the USG offer; Vissoth said that the decision was not his and
that he would wait for the PM's instructions.


4. (SBU) Comment. Vissoth's remarks were not encouraging
at best and at worst, suggest that the Cambodians are still
holding out for an unrealistic debt deal. Vissoth did
mention that the RGC had repaid the Japanese debt of roughly
USD 4.2 million related to pre-cut-off date Japanese loans;
at least Japanese objections (reftel B) will not be used in
future discussions, but we appear to back to a debate on
interest rates. This may be another delaying tactic,
however, and we would welcome Washington thinking as how best
to move the discussion forward with the MEF. End Comment.
MUSSOMELI