Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07PARIS830
2007-03-05 14:42:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Paris
Cable title:  

OECD: REPORT OF JANUARY 16-18, 2007 MEETING OF THE

Tags:  KCOR ECON EINV ETRD PREL OECD 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHFR #0830/01 0641442
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 051442Z MAR 07
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5336
INFO RUEHSS/OECD POSTS COLLECTIVE
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 1811
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES 1371
RUEHLJ/AMEMBASSY LJUBLJANA 0402
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 0446
RUEHSF/AMEMBASSY SOFIA 0497
RUEHTL/AMEMBASSY TALLINN 0331
RUEHRH/AMEMBASSY RIYADH 0335
RUEHJI/AMCONSUL JEDDAH 0056
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RUEAWJA/DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L PARIS 000830 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EB/IFD/OMA, EUR/ERA, INL/C, L/LEI AND L/EB
DOC FOR ITA/MAC/MTA/BARLOW, OGC/NICKERSON/MANSEAU
DOJ FOR CRIMINAL DIVISION/FRAUD SECTION/MMENDELSOHN/JACOBSON
USEU FOR MRICHARDS
PASS TO US SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISION/ENFORCEMENT/RGRIME,
INTL.AFFAIRS/TBEATTY

FROM USOECD

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/05/2012
TAGS: KCOR ECON EINV ETRD PREL OECD
SUBJECT: OECD: REPORT OF JANUARY 16-18, 2007 MEETING OF THE
WORKING GROUP ON BRIBERY

Classified By: CHARGE D'AFFAIRES CURTIS STONE FOR REASONS 1.5 (B
AND D)

REF: Paris 829

C O N F I D E N T I A L PARIS 000830

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EB/IFD/OMA, EUR/ERA, INL/C, L/LEI AND L/EB
DOC FOR ITA/MAC/MTA/BARLOW, OGC/NICKERSON/MANSEAU
DOJ FOR CRIMINAL DIVISION/FRAUD SECTION/MMENDELSOHN/JACOBSON
USEU FOR MRICHARDS
PASS TO US SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISION/ENFORCEMENT/RGRIME,
INTL.AFFAIRS/TBEATTY

FROM USOECD

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/05/2012
TAGS: KCOR ECON EINV ETRD PREL OECD
SUBJECT: OECD: REPORT OF JANUARY 16-18, 2007 MEETING OF THE
WORKING GROUP ON BRIBERY

Classified By: CHARGE D'AFFAIRES CURTIS STONE FOR REASONS 1.5 (B
AND D)

REF: Paris 829


1. (U) SUMMARY: At its January 16-18 meeting, the OECD Working
Group on Bribery (WGB) heard remarks from Secretary General
Gurria on the need for the WGB to combat corruption. The WGB
also conducted a Phase 2 peer-review evaluation assessing
Poland's implementation of its OECD Anti-Bribery Convention
obligations. The WGB called on Poland to strengthen its
corporate liability laws and close a significant loophole that
makes it difficult to prosecute companies that bribe foreign
public officials. The WGB reviewed country enforcement actions
on foreign bribery and UN Oil-for-Food cases, began discussions
on the U.K.'s discontinuation of the BAE/Saudi Arabia case and
released a public statement about this inquiry. The WGB
discussed a future monitoring mechanism and possible revision of
the 1997 Revised Recommendation, which outlined best practices
in areas such as accounting, auditing and public procurement,
non-tax deductibility of bribes and other measures to combat
bribery; discussed release of an annual report, compilation of
WGB enforcement statistics, and distribution of a typology on
bribery and public procurement; reviewed follow-up reports by
Korea, Finland, and Italy, held a special session on China;
addressed other accession and outreach issues, and reelected the
Chair, Vice Chair and three new members of the Management Group
(MG). END SUMMARY.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Secretary General Gurria's address - para 2

SIPDIS
Poland Phase 2 Evaluation - para 3
Tour de Table of Enforcement Actions - para 4
-- UK: BAE/Saudi Arabia - paras 5-11

-- Remaining Cases - para 12
Phase 2 Follow-up Reports
-- Italy - paras 13-14
-- Korea - para 15
-- Australia - para 16
-- Slovak Republic - para 17
Revision of Anti-Bribery Instruments and
Post Phase-2 Monitoring Mechanism - paras 18-19
Accession and Outreach
-- China Special Session - paras 20-23
-- Outreach continued - para 24
Annual Report/Statistics - para 25
Export Credit Group /Bribery and
Public Procurement Report - para 26
Other: Elections/Calendar - paras 27-29

SECRETARY GENERAL GURRIA ADDRESSES WGB

SIPDIS


2. (U) OECD Secretary General Angel Gurria told WGB members
they must provide leadership to reduce the supply side of
bribery. While progress had been made, far too few countries
have shown enforcement results; the WGB must do better. Gurria
urged the WGB to maintain rigor in designing the next phase of
its monitoring process and said it is right to review OECD
anti-bribery instruments to ensure they reflect the highest
standards. The Secretary General noted the WGB has an
opportunity to exercise global leadership through cooperation in
implementing the U.N. Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) and
by reaching out to new emerging market players who must begin to
address the supply side of bribery, as well as the demand side.
The Secretary General said the U.K.'s decision to discontinue
investigating the BAE/Saudi Arabia case was of concern for the
OECD Anti-bribery Convention (the Convention) and asked the
Chair and Secretariat to keep him informed. He welcomed the
forum provided by the OECD for a full and fair discussion of the
issues and underscored the expectation that integrity of the
Convention will be maintained. Investigations and prosecutions

are where the Convention is put to the test, stated Gurria, and
political will of members individually and collectively is of
critical importance. He encouraged the WGB to extend its
cooperation with other institutions, including the multilateral
development banks.

POLAND PHASE 2 EXAMINATION


3. (U) Lead examiners Turkey and U.K. briefed on results of the
Phase 2 on-site visit to Poland, identifying key deficiencies in
its enforcement efforts. WGB members agreed that Poland should:
amend its law to confirm clearly that bribes to foreign public
officials cannot be tax deductible, review the "impunity"
provision in article 229.6 of the Penal Code which allows
perpetrators of foreign bribery to escape punishment
automatically by notifying authorities of the offense, and
either exclude its application to foreign bribery or
significantly limit its scope, work more proactively to detect,
investigate and prosecute cases of foreign bribery and raise
awareness of foreign bribery in the public and private sector,
and consider strengthening safeguards to ensure that
prosecutorial decisions cannot be affected by political and
economic considerations set out in Article 5 of the Convention,
a potential risk because of the dual role of the Prosecutor
General and Minister of Justice. The WGB welcomed Poland's
declaration that it would address a deficiency in the law on
corporate liability to eliminate a requirement that a natural
person be convicted as a prerequisite to proceeding against a
collective entity. The WGB also recognized its responsiveness
in providing information, evidence and other forms of mutual
legal assistance (MLA) in other countries.

TOUR DE TABLE DISCUSSION OF CASES


4. (U) The Tour de Table on enforcement actions on alleged
foreign bribery cases is an essential part of monitoring country
enforcement of the OECD Convention. Discussion is keyed to a
restricted matrix of foreign bribery allegations, organized by
member country. USdel presented an update on Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act matters under inquiry or investigation by DOJ
and/or the Securities and Exchange Commission. In some cases,
USdel noted that we had made inquiries and determined the items
included in the matrix should be removed, as the allegations did
not appear to involve a U.S. nexus or we could not verify any
basis for the allegations. The January meeting included a
special session devoted to the U.K.'s termination of an
investigation into BAE plc and a defense contract with Saudi
Arabia.

U.K. TERMINATION OF BAE/SAUDI ARABIA INVESTIGATION


5. (C) The Acting Chair noted that the U.K.'s decision in this
case appeared to constitute a violation of the Convention. U.K.
delegation head Jo Kuenssberg recognized the level of interest
in the case and stressed the need to respect the confidentiality
of the Tour de Table and the information relayed. She said the
case would be part of the written follow-up of the U.K.'s Phase
2 examination scheduled for March and noted that the U.K.
delegation had not requested the discussion be held in
restricted session (closed to non-WGB members). Other officials
present to discuss the case represented the Serious Fraud Office
(SFO),the Ministry of Defense Police (MOD Police),and the
office of the Attorney General (AG). The lead SFO rep expressed
the U.K. delegation's willingness to answer as much as possible
WGB questions, bearing in mind pending litigation. She advised
that on December 14, SFO Director Robert Wardle decided to
discontinue the joint SFO/MOD Police investigation based on his
personal, independent judgment. Key U.K. contentions included:
the BAE/Saudi Arabia case had been discontinued by SFO Director
in the public interest, based on risks to international and
national security; the decision was based on exceptional factors
and the U.K. government did not view it as precedent-setting;


U.K. authorities did not consider the decision to have
constituted a breach of Article 5 of the Convention; other
investigations involving BAE involving South Africa, Tanzania,
Romania, Chile, and the Czech Republic continued; and the U.K.
remained committed to tackling international corruption. (Note:
A detailed report of the U.K. briefing on the BAE/Saudi case is
provided reftel).


6. (C) Co-lead examiners of the U.K. Phase 2 review, Canada and
France, placed the decision in the wider context of that review.
The Canadian delegation commented that public interest may
inform prosecutorial discretion, but noted the U.K. Phase 2
report identified specific concerns regarding the U.K.'s
definition of public interest and obstacles to its ability to
initiate investigations of the foreign bribery offense. Nothing
in the U.K.'s explanation answered these concerns. The French
delegation underscored that Article 5 of the Convention
prohibited consideration of the impact on relations with another
State in enforcement decisions and stressed the need for
safeguards on the invocation of national security. It noted
France was interested in considering a Phase 2 bis examination
of the U.K. following discussion of the written follow-up report
in March.


7. (C) In response to U.S. questions, the SFO rep conceded that
as the investigation was terminated before charges were brought
and a conviction obtained, there were "unpalatable economic and
commercial results that will have to be resolved in another
forum." The AG rep conceded differences in views of the AG and
the SFO Director on the merits of the case, but said the
decision had been based on public interest considerations,
rather than an assessment about the sufficiency of the evidence.
He asserted that all intelligence agencies in the U.K. had
agreed that national and international security risks were
present in the case.


8. (C) The Italian delegation stated that it was important that
the WGB understood whether the UK decision was based on specific
information regarding the safety and security of the U.K. The
Australian delegation stated that it fully supported proper
prosecutorial discretion and considered valid a distinction
between relations with another State and national and
international security interests.


9. (C) The Acting Chair commented that it was not in the
interest of the WGB or of the U.K. to be seen as throwing the
Convention out the window. She said that another option was to
treat this case as an exceptional situation requiring
exceptional measures. She noted that the March WGB meeting
would include a review of institutional issues that may have
influenced the U.K. decision. The U.S. delegation commented
that it was not appropriate at this juncture to conclude that
Article 5 does not contemplate the proper invocation of national
security interests, and it was also inappropriate to end
consideration of the case before the WGB heard more about the
U.K. system of implementation of the Convention and this case
during the U.K.'s follow-up written review in March. The Acting
Chair said the WGB would consider all possible appropriate
actions at the March meeting, including a Phase 2 bis
examination of the U.K., if additional questions regarding
implementation remained.


10. (C) The Netherlands, U.S., Canada, France, Switzerland,
Spain, Sweden, Chile, Italy, Norway, Greece, Estonia and
Argentina joined a WGB consensus that the case presented serious
concerns and that a clear public statement expressing those
concerns was necessary to maintain credibility.

TOUR DE TABLE - OTHER ISSUES


11. (SBU) ATTENTION: Please be advised the following
information summarizes an OECD restricted document; names of

individuals and/or companies should not be disclosed. A summary
of delegates' statements focused on foreign bribery case updates
and other developments is set forth below:
GERMANY: Reported the Siemens/ENEL (Italy) case, in which
Siemens allegedly had made improper payments of 6 million Euro,
continues. Germany is very satisfied with the mutual legal
assistance (MLA) provided by Italian authorities; reported the
Freeport/Manila case continues, and is divided into one case for
German prosecution and one case for Italian prosecution;
confirmed that Germany cannot provide MLA unless a criminal case
is proceeding; noted ten Oil-For-Food (OFF) cases in four
different districts had been consolidated under one prosecutor
who is investigating the illegal breaking of the Iraq embargo;
advised that most of the cases involving Siemens are being
handled by prosecutors in Munich, who intend to brief the WGB
after preliminary investigations are completed; and requested
deletion of the Bristol Myers Squibb case from the matrix of
ongoing cases. USdel noted an ongoing SEC investigation,
activity in Germany by a subsidiary of a publicly traded
company, and advised that the case should not be deleted from
the matrix.

ARGENTINA: Reported no update on cases, but advised that
Argentina is completing a self-evaluation/analysis of
anti-corruption efforts as part of implementation of the
Inter-American Convention Against Corruption and reported that
Argentina's Senate had passed a law regarding funding of
political parties.

AUSTRALIA: Reported that AWB, Rhine Ruhr and Alkaloids OFF cases
continue; briefed on the Cole Inquiry, which issued findings
November 24, 2006, and stated the expectation of appropriate law
enforcement follow-up on the referrals by the Cole Inquiry of 12
individual for investigation and possible prosecution; advised
that the Cole Inquiry had found that payments made by AWB to
Iraq could not be classified as bribes under the Australian
criminal code; noted that in follow-up to Phase 2
recommendations, Australia is considering amending the law that
allows a defense if conduct was lawful in the country where
payment was made; requested deletion of the Conoco Phillips case
given dismissal by a U.S. District Court and deletion of the
allegation against an Australian official; reported Oil
Exploration/Mauritania and Anvil/Dikulushi Concession (DRCongo)
investigations are ongoing.

AUSTRIA: Reported that OFF investigations are ongoing, but
prosecutors are considering dropping case because of problems
with documents received from the ICC and because the Iraqi
government charged all companies and no Iraqi public official
benefited. After the Acting Chair noted continuing WGB and
Secretariat concerns regarding the Schlaff/Oasis Casino (Israel)

SIPDIS
case, Austria del noted that Austria had responded "partly" to
three requests for MLA; a fourth MLA request was pending; the
limitation period was not in risk of running out; and Austria
will provide more details in an oral follow-up in March. The
Acting Chair took note that Austria had received four requests
for MLA in the Schlaff case and is only now considering opening
a case. The USdel echoed Chair's concern regarding Schlaff case
and questioned the Austrian delegation's position regarding OFF
prosecutions, noting the need for investigation if there is
indication that acts committed by Austrian companies violated
any laws. The Swedish delegation raised the possibility of
Austria bringing a sanctions busting case. The Chair questioned
whether Austria had passed legislation penalizing violations of
UNSC sanctions. If it had not, it was incumbent that it does so
promptly. The Austrian del said they will confer with
prosecutors.

BRAZIL: Reported inquiries into OFF cases continued. The Univen
Petroquimical (Bolivia) case is being investigated, but appears
to be a tax evasion case; no proceeding has been open in the

Meat Exports (Russia) case. USdel inquired whether Brazilian
authorities have the power to compel documents, and noted the
case should remain on the matrix until authorities have taken
reasonable steps to determine whether an allegation may be
substantiated.

CANADA: Reported that as of December 12, 2006, a Director of
Public Prosecutors has replaced the Federal Prosecution Service
of the Department of Justice; Parliament is considering limiting
how the Attorney General can instruct prosecutors, requiring
such instruction be in writing and be made public; OFF
investigations continue; re: Skytel (Haiti) case, said Canada
understands an investigation is ongoing in the U.S., and Canada
is ready to assist; re: Terra Seis case, reported company
involved is a wholly owned Trinidad and Tobago subsidiary, USdel
noted U.S. is looking for a more proactive stance, Canadian del
does not want to duplicate efforts, but will take the issue back
to Canadian authorities; Canadian prosecutors had found nothing
to start investigations in the Dundee (Bulgaria),UN Procurement
Fraud/Peacekeeping Ops; or Oil Exploration Companies
(Mauritania) cases; reported Bangladesh is looking into Niko
Resources (Bangladesh) case and Canada is prepared to assist; in
ITXC (Nigeria) case, stated that the U.S. is investigating and
Canada is prepared to assist; Acting Chair noted that WGB is
waiting for further cases. USdel questioned whether Canada had
asked for formal or informal MLA in the Terra Seis case
regarding evidence that the parent company had authorized the
conduct which took place in the foreign subsidiary or had asked
Terra Seis to provide evidence or documents relating to whether
anyone at the parent company had authorized a bribe.

CZECH REPUBLIC: Reported investigation continues in Cocoa
Scandal (Ghana) case.

KOREA: Reported that a GOK UNCAC Task Force is considering an
asset recovery bill; plans to participate in an APEC
Anti-Corruption Meeting in Australia in February; re:
Hyundai/Police Vehicles case (Kenya),has found no Korean
company in Kenya; re: Kia/Hyundai (Slovakia),has found no
sufficient evidence to investigate Kia; re: Powers/US Army Base,
has not received information from U.S. Army.

SPAIN: Reported Spain had responded to an MLA request by Kenyan
authorities in the AngloLeasing case; and reported that neither
company involved in the case was registered in Spain and no
inquiry had been opened in Spain.

ESTONIA: Reported that a law on liability of third parties will
become effective February 1, 2007.

UNITED STATES: Reported that the U.S. ratified UNCAC on October
30, 2006; a new FCPA/money laundering case (Sapsizian/Alcatel)
was charged December 1, 2006 in case involving $2.5 million in
bribes and requested that matrix be updated accordingly; DOJ had
issued two opiQon releases (one involved a contribution to an
African country's Customs department to support
anti-counterfeiting programs [approved]; the other involved the
proposed retention of an attorney/law firm for acquisition of a
large sum of foreign exchange [approved]); advised that former
UN official BENON Sevan had been indicted Jan. 17, 2007 in New
York with a co-conspirator in a case involving kickbacks;
advised that Oily Rock/Azerbaijan Privatization Program case is
scheduled for trial in October 2007; re: IBM/China Construction
Bank and NCR/China Construction Bank, noted U.S. has an ongoing
investigation involving Alltel and will expand it to see whether
there are grounds to investigate IBM or NCR; re: Teleglobe
(Nigeria),reported Yaw Osei Amoako had been charged and pled
guilty; re: U.S. v. Giffen (Kazakhstan),reported that Second
Circuit decision had been received and the case will be further
litigated in the trial court regarding access to classified
documents; re: Instrumentarium case, Finnish del noted that
Costa Rica had not answered Finland's request for MLA, and that

Finland had renewed the request; requested removal of SAIC
(Greece) case having conferred with French magistrate and
company counsel; requested deletion of Chevron (Ecuador) case as
no complaint ever received; requested deletion of Mowag (Chile)
as conduct preceded the acquisition by a U.S. company.

FINLAND: Reported on progress on follow-up to recommendations,
including consideration by a higher-level Working Group on
whether to amend legislation to require an obligation of tax
administration officials to report corrupt payments.

FRANCE: Reported that five cases have been initiated; re:
Total/Iraq case, prosecution opened in October 2006; re:
Alstom/Enelpower (Italy),awaiting information from Italian
authorities whether Enelpower official is considered foreign
public official; re: unidentified companies (EU Commission)
case, reported that no French company was mentioned and France
has no info, awaiting info from Belgium, U.K.del provided
additional information that Czech and British companies who were
approached by official had declined bribe solicitation and
notified officials; Acting Chair suggested France raise the
issue with Belgian authorities; re: Bollore (Cameroon) case,
French prosecutors had no information on Cameroon proceedings;
in response to inquiry by USdel whether French authorities had
contacted Cameroon authorities, French del reported they had not
and were waiting for contact from Cameroon authorities. Acting
Chair suggested France contact Cameroon directly; re: Bollore
(Ivory Coast),France reported no allegation of any crime in
Ivory Coast; re: AREVA/Ethiopia Electric Power Co., reported
that Ethiopian Power had lost case in Ethiopian court; re:
Alcatel/ICE (Costa Rica),an MLA request to Costa Rica has
received partial response; re: Thales Slush Fund, proceeding
opened in France in December 2005 and investigation continues;
re: Thales-DCN (India),investigation opened in 2006; re: THEC
(Cambodia),same case as Thales Slush Fund; re: TSKJ (Nigeria)
and Sagem/ID Cards (Nigeria) cases, proceedings continue; re:
EU/Subsidized Cereals case, investigation launched by Paris
prosecutor followed by MLA request by Belgian authorities,
Belgian authorities are continuing proceedings and requested the
case be deleted from matrix for France.

HUNGARY: Reported a conviction had been obtained in a foreign
bribery offense case involving visas and the U.S. and Australian
embassies; smuggling case on the Hungarian-Slovak border is in
criminal court phase; matrix cases - prosecutors looked into
cases but did not find sufficient information to begin
investigation, requested deletion from matrix.

IRELAND: Reported cases still under investigation; Ireland Phase
2 examination in March.

ITALY: Reported that a court had denied a preventive seizure of
assets in an OFF case; requested deletion of Immucor/Italian MD
and Czech Tank Modernization/Officine Galileo cases from matrix.

JAPAN: Reported re: Hitachi/China Construction Bank case
Japanese authorities are seeking information from the Chinese
court; USdel suggested Japanese authorities request company for
information regarding internal inquiry; re: Japanese steel
suppliers (China),Japan has requested information informally;
reported Japan was seeking MLA in two cases (one on matrix and
one not on matrix); Mitsui (China) and Eidai (Brazil) cases
deleted from matrix.

LUXEMBOURG: Reported preliminary investigation of OFF case
indicated no crime of bribery of foreign public official;
investigation continuing to extent of another possible crime;
will contact French colleagues regarding a case which appears to
involve suspected foreign bribery of a Luxembourg public
official.

NORWAY: Reported no developments in cases, but requested that

Steps Taken report reflect Norway had ratified UNCAC June 29,

2006.

NETHERLANDS: Reported in the OFF/Trafigura case a plea agreement
between parent company in U.S. in which company will be fined
and Netherlands looking into matter; Trafigura/Jamaica case is
in prosecution in Netherlands; re: Shell/Iran, there is no
indication of foreign bribery by Shell and delegation proposes
deletion; re: Mittalgate/Iran, the allegation was found to be
false; re: TSKJ/Nigeria, case is not under independent
investigation in Netherlands; U.S. will request MLA for
Netherlands, which will act on it; reported re: EU/Subsidized
Cereals case, a Dutch national is being tried in Belgium and the
case should be removed from matrix for Netherlands; U.S.
delegation inquired about status of Mr. Pluimers, whose
extradition was requested five years ago.

U.K.: Reported UNCAC has been extended to the British Virgin
Islands and Cayman Islands will present bill to extend both the
OECD Convention and UNCAC; reported opening of nine preliminary
inquiries, most of which are not reflected in the matrix;
reported a number of operations undertaken by the new City
Police Unit; noted the U.K. may require MLA from the U.S. in the
Weir case; re: UN Procurement Fraud/Peacekeeping case, reported
that U.K. expects to receive information from the U.N. soon; re:
Oil Exploration companies (Mauritania) case, U.K. is in contact
with Australian authorities; requested deletion of Mabey and
Johnson (Iraq, Papua New Guinea and Philippines) case, as
attempts to obtain information has been unsuccessful; re: BOTEC
(Botswana),UK has sought information from Botswana without
success, requests deletion; requests deletion of Royal Dutch
Shell (Iran) case; re: Lincoln Park (U.S.) case, notes Potter
sentenced in U.S. and UK does not propose trying him in U.K,
requests deletion; requests deletion of GlaxoSmithKline
(Germany) case as it involved old allegations; re: Anglo-leasing
(Kenya),U.K. is seeking more information from Kenya.

SLOVAK REPUBLIC: Requested deletion of Multinational Smuggling
Ring case, as investigation indicated it was a domestic
corruption case in Hungary.

SWEDEN: Reported that it had no specific information to share
regarding the unidentified companies (EU Commission) case, but
Sweden is expecting assistance from the U.K. SFO; requested
deletion of Skanska (Czech Republic) case as no information
obtained regarding connection to Sweden; re: Ericsson/ICE (Costa
Rica),reported receipt of assistance from French prosecutor,
but no formal investigation initiated, still seeking evidence to
initiate case.

SWITZERLAND: No new case information, but prosecutors plan to
attend the March WGB meeting; seeking information from the
Secretariat on the Roche (Turkey) case.

SIPDIS

TURKEY: Reported Barmek (Azerbaijan) case is ongoing; requested
deletion of Customs Fraud/Bulgarian Checkpoint case in view of
lack of allegations.

Bulgaria, Denmark, New Zealand, Portugal and Slovenia were
absent from the Tour de Table. Poland and Mexico reported no
new developments. Belgium, Greece, Slovak Republic and Sweden
reported Oil-For-Food (OFF) cases were proceeding.

PHASE 2 FOLLOW-UP REPORTS


12. (U) Within one year of the WGB's approval of the Report of
Phase 2 Examination, countries must, at a minimum, provide an
oral report on steps it has taken or plans to take to implement
the WGB's priority recommendations. A detailed written
follow-up report must be provided within two years.

ITALY (WRITTEN FOLLOW-UP)



13. (SBU) Lead examiners Germany and U.K. shared grave concerns
regarding Italy's failure to implement the recommendation to
amend its legislation to exclude the defense of concussione from
the offense of foreign bribery, leaving serious gaps in its
implementation of Convention obligations. Italy maintained that
concussione should not be considered as involving bribery of a
public official, but rather as a defense to extortion committed
by a public official. The lead examiners differed regarding
appropriate next steps. The U.K. considered that monitoring and
follow-up would not address the deficiency and recommended the
WGB send a letter to draw the relevant Minister's attention to
Italy's failure to implement adequately the Convention and
Revised Recommendation, a position strongly supported by the
U.S. delegation. Germany favored extending the follow-up and
monitoring period and postponing a letter to the Minister, a
position which the Slovak and Czech Republics supported. The
Acting Chair advised that ordinary procedure regarding
non-compliance with a strong recommendation would be to put the
Party on notice. Although the recommendation stands, given the
requirement for consensus-minus-one support for further action,
the Acting Chair advised Italy it must report back to the WGB in
one year's time on its implementation of the recommendation.


14. (SBU) Examiners also noted a recommendation regarding tax
amnesty had lost its relevance as the tax amnesty program was
not continued; that Italy had partially implemented a
recommendation to amend provisions on false accounting, but the
new law may not be sufficiently dissuasive; steps were underway
to implement a recommendation to extend the length of the
"ultimate" limitation period as a bill is pending;
recommendations regarding cooperation between MOJ and law
enforcement on MLA had been satisfactorily implemented;
clarified a follow-up issue by confirming that a decree relating
to liability of legal persons covered State-owned enterprises.

KOREA (WRITTEN FOLLOW-UP)


15. (SBU) Lead examiners Australia and Finland reported
significant follow-up of recommendations, including very good
progress in awareness raising efforts. Regarding a
recommendation to ensure that the defense of social customs is
not applicable to the foreign bribery offense, lead examiners
advised that case law in 2006 recognized that the defense does
not apply to foreign bribery. Korea had made no progress on
recommendations to consider increasing the maximum penalty for
foreign bribery, to clarify that Korean foreign bribery
legislation applies when a bribe is transmitted directly to a
third party or to consider ensuring that government and
government-funded agencies that provide contracting
opportunities to Korean companies have authority to audit
companies suspected or convicted of bribing foreign public
officials.

AUSTRALIA (ORAL FOLLOW-UP)


16. (SBU) The Australian delegation briefed on the
recommendations made by the Cole Inquiry, which had investigated
Australian actions in relation to the UN Oil-for-Food program.
The Cole Inquiry recommended the Criminal Code be changed to
include offenses for acting contrary to UN sanctions that
Australia has agreed to uphold. The Australian government has
established a Task Force to consider possible prosecutions as
recommended by the Cole Inquiry. In the context of the Cole
Inquiry findings, Australia is considering a WGB recommendation
to amend the defense for conduct that is "lawful" in the foreign
public official's country to ensure consistency with Commentary
8 of the Convention. The Australian del assured that an
appropriate approach will be implemented. Although the Cole
Inquiry did not have a mandate to review Australia's tax code,
the Australian Tax Office (ATO) is examining how possible
changes to the Criminal Code to include sanctions busting would

require tax legislation changes. Such changes, which will take
some time, will likely to be prospective. Australia has
continued with its foreign bribery awareness campaign; placed a
higher priority on corruption and foreign bribery by the
Australian Federal Police (AFP); clarified that Commonwealth
agencies must report all cases of suspected foreign bribery to
the AFP; clarified that all Australian Public Service employees
must report any instances of bribery that they observe in the
course of their employment; is reviewing whistleblower
protection provisions; is reviewing penalties for the offense of
bribing a foreign public official; and has issued a direction to
all prosecutors that when deciding whether to bring a
prosecution for bribery of a foreign public official, the
Director of Public Prosecutions should not be influenced by
considerations specified in Article 5 of the Convention.

SLOVAK REPUBLIC (ORAL FOLLOW-UP)


17. (SBU) The Slovak delegation briefed on actions implementing
recommendations regarding: (a) awareness raising (issuance of
guidelines regarding auditors' reporting obligations;
dissemination of anti-bribery information by EXIMBANKA SR,
Foreign Ministry and overseas representations, tax authorities
(translation and distribution of OECD Bribery Awareness Handbook
for Tax Examiners),and the Supreme Audit Office (training));
(b) prevention and detection of foreign bribery through taxation
(enactment of legislation expressly denying tax deductibility of
bribe payments to foreign public officials),export credits
(reformulation of exporters' statement regarding submission of
agents' commissions); accounting and auditing (training of
auditors in International Auditing Standards, training on
proceeds of crime and corruption; preparation and publication of
guidelines on the duty of auditors to report unusual
transactions by the Slovak Auditors' Chamber); anti-money
laundering measures (interagency discussions and training); (c)
raising awareness in the private and public sector of the
obligation to report foreign bribery cases and to raise
awareness about whistleblower protection (no apparent progress);
(d) investigation of foreign bribery (training police officers
and recruits on investigating foreign bribery and coordinating
meetings to enhance cooperation among law enforcement agencies
involved in combating foreign bribery); (e) need to amend
legislation to exclude defense of "effective regret" (Ministry
of Justice analysis is currently pending receipt of additional
information from Special Prosecution Office); (f) prosecution of
foreign bribery (increased penalties for false accounting; GOS
decided not to submit to Parliament draft law to abolish Special
Court and Office of Special Prosecutor, but will attempt to
address constitutionality issues separately; reported admission
of one judge to Special Court; organized training sessions on
foreign bribery for Special Judges and Special Prosecutors; and
regarding recommendation to establish liability of legal persons
for foreign bribery without delay, reported draft law submitted
to Parliament in February 2006 has not yet been discussed).

REVISION OF ANTI-BRIBERY INSTRUMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENT OF
POST-PHASE II MONITORING MECHANISM


18. (U) The Acting Chair reported that correspondence from the
International Chamber of Commerce to Secretary General Gurria
strongly encouraged the WGB to adopt a Post-Phase 2 mechanism
for robust monitoring. The Secretariat presented three draft
papers setting out options based on discussions at the October
WGB meeting. The Secretariat's preliminary work, welcomed by
many delegations, contemplates simultaneous completion by
October 2008 of the revision of anti-bribery instruments
(Revised Recommendation, possible additions to Commentaries, and
interpretive notes) and development of a post-Phase 2 monitoring
mechanism, which would focus on progress made on outstanding
Phase 2 recommendations, enforcement results, new issues raised
by changes in legislative or institutional framework for
implementing Convention and horizontal thematic issues. While

current OECD rules do not permit public posting of draft
documents during public consultation process, Secretariat
officials said the issue is under active review. The Swiss and
Argentine delegations expressed concerns about how to
accommodate the additional burden on workload these activities
will impose.


19. (U) The Secretariat's suggestion for establishment of two
sub-groups to work on (1) criminalization issues and (2)
preventive mechanisms such as export credit, official
development assistance, public procurement, auditing and non-tax
deductibility drew mixed comments from several delegations, with
some expressing concerns that subgroups could impose additional
travel and workload burdens, especially on smaller delegations.


OUTREACH ACTIVITIES: SPECIAL SESSION ON CHINA


20. (U) Kong Xiang Ren, Deputy Director-General of the Ministry
of Supervision, which coordinates China's Anti-Corruption
Campaign, briefed on China's efforts to spur economic
development while controlling corruption. Kong noted that
President Hu in July 2005 had directed the government to focus
on the issue of bribery in commercial transactions. Kong
described the legal framework supporting those efforts,
including a 2007 law on money laundering and the recent
ratification of UNCAC. He said efforts were shifting from
prosecution to prevention, and the government was building
public awareness through the use of 24-hour hotlines and
Integrity Programs to educate pubic servants and the public.
China continues to establish the systems and institutions needed
to fight corruption. While China has not yet enacted
legislation to prohibit the bribery of foreign public officials,
the government recognizes the growing risks posed by Chinese
companies which are increasingly active oversees and is
establishing codes of conduct that prohibit bribery. The
government supports self-examination and self-ratification by
both public and private enterprises, and focuses efforts to
combat bribery in various activities and sectors. Kong advised
that from August 2005 to November 2006, over 15,000 cases of
commercial bribery involving 4 billion yuan were identified, of
which more than 3,000 involved public officials.


21. (U) Secretariat Legal advisor Niccola Bonucci briefed the
Chinese del on OECD Anti-bribery instruments, including the
Convention, the Revised Recommendation of 1997, the 1996
Recommendation on Non-Tax Deductibility of Bribes, and the 2006
Recommendation on Bribery and Export Credits, underscoring the
need for a level playing field in international business
transactions and an intensive monitoring process to ensure that
all members are meeting their obligations.


22. (U) In a question and answer session, the Chinese del
reported that China: faces no limitation on jurisdiction in
bribery of foreign public officials, but would have difficulty
in obtaining evidence and would require MLA from other
countries; recognizes the liability of legal persons; has
criminal, civil and administrative sanctions; is party to 85
treaties with other countries addressing issues such as MLA and
extradition; can provide MLA to Parties not covered by a treaty
on a reciprocity basis through diplomatic channels; and had
authorized Hong Kong to provide MLA in OFF cases. The
delegation advised that a new anti-money laundering law
contained extensive recordkeeping requirements and that while
China lacks specific whistleblower protection, administrative
rules protect them and a specific law is being considered.
Chinese authorities expressed interest in exchanging information
with the WGB and in gaining additional know-how from the group's
experience with review and monitoring mechanisms, as it moves
forward to implement UNCAC.


23. (SBU) On the margins of the WGB meeting, the delegation,

which consisted of three Ministry of Supervision officials and
one Foreign Ministry official (Xu Yu, Deputy Director of Treaty
and Law),approached USdel and expressed great interest in
prosecuting and extraditing Chinese citizens suspected of
corruption who had fled to the U.S.

OUTREACH (CONTINUED)


24. (U) The Secretariat briefed on outreach activities,
including:

-- The ADB-OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative for Asia and the
Pacific, which involves 27 countries, features a self-reporting
monitoring mechanism. The initiative participants will launch
in 2007, on a trial basis, a peer review process essentially
based on the WGB's Phase 2 examinations. Malaysia has
volunteered to be the first country reviewed. Organizers would
welcome participation by WGB members in the review process, in
addition to the three WGB members who currently participate in
the ADB-OECD initiative (Korea, Japan and Australia);

-- The Anti-Corruption Network for Eastern Europe and Central
Asia (ACN),in which reviews have been completed for Armenia
(which found some progress) and Ukraine (lack of progress). The
Russian Federation attended the December ACN meeting and
expressed interest in reactivating its involvement. Organizers
have advised Russia it has to take official steps by mid-2007 to
complete its review or the group will consider suspending it
from participation. Reviews will next be completed for
Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. A seminar, co-organized by the OSCE,
COE, UNODC and OECD, to raise awareness and focus on
international legal standards for criminalization of corruption
covering the OECD, COE and UN anti-corruption conventions will
take place in Almaty, Kazakhstan, March 26-28, 2007.

-- A representative from the Council of Europe reported that the
Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO),which will have 44
members as of February 1, 2007, launched new third phase
evaluations in January 2007, including transparency of political
party funding.

-- A representative from the Organization of American States
reported that the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption
(IACC) has been ratified by 33 of 34 OAS member countries and
the that the OAS has created a mechanism for follow up. A Joint
OAS-OECD anti-corruption and integrity meeting is tentatively
scheduled for Spring 2007 in Washington.

-- Ted Greenberg briefed on WB technical assistance to member
countries on financial issues such as anti-money laundering and
the "Strengthen Bank Group Engagement on Governance and
Corruption" initiative. He said the WB is working with FATF to
build confiscation regimes, develop a Best Practices Book for
financial supervisors in the areas of anti-money laundering and
countering terrorism finance, and is preparing a report on
corruption and money laundering related to illegal logging.

ANNUAL REPORT/STATISTICS


25. (U) The WGB discussed a Secretariat-prepared draft annual
report for 2006 and agreed to go forward with it to increase
visibility. A number of delegations (France, U.S.) favored
inclusion of a statistical annex as soon as such information is
available to provide quantitative, as well as qualitative
information, which would be useful, given the limitations on
existing indices on perceptions of corruption. The WGB then
discussed a draft instrument prepared by the Secretariat to
compile more comprehensive foreign bribery and related
accounting misconduct enforcement and sanctions statistics.
While most delegations appeared to support the effort, some
noted that not all proposed categories of information would be
available in their countries or could require additional


explanatory information in the instrument. Members agreed that
delegations should attempt to identify the statistical
information currently available and forward that information and
any additional suggestions regarding the draft instrument to the
Secretariat as soon as possible and prior to the March meeting.

SIPDIS

EXPORT CREDIT GROUP ANTI-BRIBERY ACTIVITIES


26. (U) A representative of the OECD ECG reported that its
Action Statement was transformed into an OECD Council
Recommendation on December 14, 2006. Most countries have
implemented the recommendation and the ECG expects full
implementation by March 2007.

OTHER ITEMS: ELECTIONS, CALENDAR


27. (U) WGB members reelected Dr. Mark Pieth WGB Chair and Dr.
Maria Gavouneli Vice-Chair of the Working Group. They also
elected candidates from France (Guillaume Vanderheyden); Italy
(Valeria Piccone) and Chile (Marcelo Garcia Silva) to fill three
vacant Management Group seats.


28. (U) The Acting Chair briefed on the invitation by the
Government of Italy to hold a Prosecutors' Meeting in Rome in
November as part of an event marking the 10th anniversary of the
Convention and the need to coordinate with the OECD Committee of
Fiscal Affairs on activities involving anti-bribery efforts.


29. (U) The March WGB plenary meeting will take place March
12-14, with preliminary meetings to begin March 11.
STONE