Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07PARIS123
2007-01-11 15:29:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Paris
Cable title:  

UNESCO REFORM: NATURAL SCIENCES SECTOR AWAITS CONCLUSIONS

Tags:  UNESCO SCI SENV AORC EAID 
pdf how-to read a cable
null
Lucia A Keegan 01/18/2007 07:37:15 PM From DB/Inbox: Lucia A Keegan

Cable 
Text: 
 
 
UNCLAS PARIS 00123

SIPDIS
cxparis:
 ACTION: UNESCO
 INFO: POL ECON AMBU AMB AMBO DCM SCI

DISSEMINATION: UNESCOX
CHARGE: PROG

APPROVED: AMB: LVOLIVER
DRAFTED: SCI: NCOOPER
CLEARED: DCM: AKOSS, HHS:JHOFF

VZCZCFRI962
RR RUEHC
DE RUEHFR #0123/01 0111529
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 111529Z JAN 07
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 4146
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PARIS 000123 

SIPDIS

FROM USMISSION UNESCO PARIS

FOR OES - ANDREW REYNOLDS, ANTOINETTE CONDO, BARRIE RIPIN, CHRISTINE
DAWSON
FOR IO - JIM DUFTY
DEPARTMENT PASS NSF FOR ROSE GOMBAY
DEPARTMENT PASS OSTP FOR GENE WHITNEY
DEPARTMENT PASS USGS FOR VERNE SCHNEIDER, MATTHEW LARSEN

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: UNESCO SCI SENV AORC EAID
SUBJECT: UNESCO REFORM: NATURAL SCIENCES SECTOR AWAITS CONCLUSIONS
OF ONGOING SCIENCES REVIEW

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PARIS 000123

SIPDIS

FROM USMISSION UNESCO PARIS

FOR OES - ANDREW REYNOLDS, ANTOINETTE CONDO, BARRIE RIPIN, CHRISTINE
DAWSON
FOR IO - JIM DUFTY
DEPARTMENT PASS NSF FOR ROSE GOMBAY
DEPARTMENT PASS OSTP FOR GENE WHITNEY
DEPARTMENT PASS USGS FOR VERNE SCHNEIDER, MATTHEW LARSEN

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: UNESCO SCI SENV AORC EAID
SUBJECT: UNESCO REFORM: NATURAL SCIENCES SECTOR AWAITS CONCLUSIONS
OF ONGOING SCIENCES REVIEW


1. Summary: On the margins of the January 9-12 meeting of the
panel established to review UNESCO's Natural Sciences sector and
Social and Human Sciences sector, there is uncertainty both in the
delegations and in the secretariat as to what the review exercise
might yield. This includes concern that the review may not have any
impact, given a sense of "fracture" -- both within and between the
sectors being reviewed, and between the review panel and the
secretariat. Nevertheless, there is still hope that the exercise

SIPDIS
may produce a positive result. One Secretariat insider regards the
review as an opportunity to refocus the two sectors' work on
specific "meta-questions": that is, on interdisciplinary problems -
including those going beyond science - as well as on problems
requiring intergovernmental cooperation (see para 5). Whatever the
panel's conclusions, the ongoing preparation of the sectors'
strategic planning documents highlights the need to provide
results-based programming training to staffers. This will be
necessary to ensure that the review panel's recommendations are
successfully implemented. End Summary.

States of Mind: "Hope and Fear" as Panel Winds Up Work


2. According to an inside source, the ambience within the Natural
Sciences Sector is somewhat "tricky". There is hope that the review
will result in something useful, along with fear of the opposite.
There is also concern that the review won't result in anything at
all. This concern is fueled by a sense of "fracture" - between the
panel and the sector(s),and within the sectors. At a recent
meeting of the Natural Sciences sector, individual reactions to the
review panel's comments on the 2008-13 Medium-Term Strategy (C-4)
were basically linked to whether the comments/recommendations would
have a positive or negative impact on the speaker's own interests
and position within the sector. As for relations between the
Natural Sciences sector and the Social Sciences sector (SHS),the

Natural Sciences sector has been working with the ethics sector on
the draft Program and Budget (C-5),although collaboration with the
rest of SHS has been limited.


3. Regarding the potential impact of the review exercise, another
secretariat source close to the panel explained that DDG Barbosa,

SIPDIS
who is chairing the review, is aiming for real reform; (given rumors
that he aspires to be the next DG),the outcome of the review will
be a critical test. But there are structural and procedural
obstacles. On one hand, DG Matsuura and DDG Barbosa want increased
intersectoral cooperation, but their Assistant Directors General
(sector heads) are not capable of thinking that way. And, the panel
has spent so much time reworking the secretariat's draft of the
medium-term strategy that members may not have been able to focus as
much on broader issues.

UNESCO Science and the State of the World


4. In the view of one respected Natural Sciences sector source, the
review panel should focus not only on the planning documents
(medium-term strategy, program and budget),but should also take a
broader view. The panel should make specific recommendations on
future areas of focus for the sectors, and on work that should be
discontinued. It should also make recommendations on any structural
changes needed to achieve these goals. There is no point in simply
saying that marginal activities should be dropped, because there has
already been "program concentration"; if it is taken further, all
that will be left is the water sector. (Comment: We believe that
further program concentration is needed, but agree that the review
panel needs to give the sectors precise guidance on future
priorities, and on programs to be discontinued. End Comment.)


5. In the view of this source, UNESCO science should focus on
interdisciplinary work, and/or work that goes beyond the sciences,
or that is intergovernmental in nature. Examples of this might
include coordinating advice on developing science infrastructure;
providing guidance on science education; and earth observations (the
latter now covered in three divisions of the sector). Biotechnology
is an example of a discipline that is proceeding apace without
UNESCO's help, and thus does not require UNESCO's involvement,
although individual countries may need help in building capacity
through science education programs.


6. Of course, it is impossible to talk about UNESCO's capacity
without considering the talents and skills of the individuals
involved. The leadership of the science policy division is strong.
The Basic Sciences and Engineering division needs a careful look in
terms of human and other resources, given its important future role.
The International Hydrology Program (IHP) has some good individual
programs; HELP, FRIEND, TIGER and G-WADI stand out as strong
programs. The Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) has
talented staff that includes a number of Americans.

The State of Play


7. As the Natural Sciences sector prepared for this week's meeting
of the review panel, they were busily engaged in pulling together
several sets of documents. These included a document incorporating
the sector's response to the panel's comments on the sector's draft
Medium Term Strategy (2008-13),and a document incorporating the
Bureau of Strategic Planning's (BSP's) comments on the sector's
draft Program and Budget (2008-9). There was concern that the panel
members might be so focused on these documents that they would have
no time to focus on the big picture.


8. Regarding the Medium-Term Strategy, the task of responding to
the review panel's comments has been last minute and lacked
continuity of leadership, due to the holiday season. Regarding the
Draft Program and Budget, the review panel will consider this
document for the first time at this week's meeting. One concern is
that the Bureau of Strategic Planning has inserted activities that
tend to overstate the Natural Science Sector's resources and place
in the grand scheme of things, for example, recommending that it
undertake a survey of biodiversity. Another challenge is that the
junior staff members who have provided input on behalf of their
divisions, while very willing, sometimes do not have a sense of
where their work fits in a larger context. This highlights the need
to provide results-based programming training to staffers if they
are to effectively implement any recommendations made by the review
panel.
Oliver