Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07NAIROBI1823
2007-04-26 05:56:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Nairobi
Cable title:  

ELIMINATING THE "APPLCIATION RECEIVED" STAMP

Tags:  CVIS OEXC CMGT DHS KE 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0014
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHNR #1823 1160556
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 260556Z APR 07
FM AMEMBASSY NAIROBI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9287
INFO RUEHAE/AMEMBASSY ASMARA 4943
RUEHDS/AMEMBASSY ADDIS ABABA 9272
RUEHLGB/AMEMBASSY KIGALI 4797
RUEHKI/AMEMBASSY KINSHASA 1862
RHMFISS/US CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS NAIROBI 001823 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR CA/VO/F/P JILL NYSTROM

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CVIS OEXC CMGT DHS KE
SUBJECT: ELIMINATING THE "APPLCIATION RECEIVED" STAMP

REF: A. STATE 4819

UNCLAS NAIROBI 001823

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR CA/VO/F/P JILL NYSTROM

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CVIS OEXC CMGT DHS KE
SUBJECT: ELIMINATING THE "APPLCIATION RECEIVED" STAMP

REF: A. STATE 4819


1. Post received reftel and immediately discontinued use of the
"application received" stamp. Nairobi has monitored the change over
the past quarter and requests permission to reinstitute the stamp
process for the following reasons:

-- Issuances and refusals are not always being captured by the NIV
system, and not always being electronically recorded. Post notices
at least a half-dozen applications a day in which previous issuances
and refusals are missing from the system. This is particularly
problematic with children, who for unknown technical reasons, are
often not captured as refusals. This forces officers to rely on the
honesty of applicants' responses to DS-156 questions 31 about
previous refusals. Nairobi is very concerned about refusals that
potentially could go unnoticed due to the combination of
technological deficiencies and unscrupulous applicants who now go
unchecked by the "application received" stamp.

-- Applicants in East Africa use fluid name conventions that often
change from passport to passport. Even genuine passports often show
dramatic changes in name from one passport to the next. Despite
Post's effective use of alias fields, we believe that even slight
name changes throw-off attempts by the NIV system to keep track of
applicants' previous issuances and refusals. Nonetheless, in some
situations, even persons with the same name and date of birth are
not being captured electronically by the system, despite previous
application records. It is too time intensive and not reasonable to
expect line officers to countercheck NIV with the CCD to determine
if applicants have had previous issuances or refusals that might not
be appearing in the NIV system.

-- There have been complaints from friendly Embassies, which have
used the presence of an "applicantion received" stamp as a litmus
test for their applicants. Post gets numerous requests from other
missions to confirm whether we have refused applicants who have
subsequently sought visas with them. This continued liaison
function is beneficial for us and other missions, as we can discuss
our shared applicant pool and their fraud trends. We believe that
the discontinuation of the "application received" stamp will result
in less interaction with other missions and may result in Post
fielding dead-end questions about applicants not in our system.
Finally, we realize that, with the disappearance of the stamp,
friendly consulates will not even know when we have determined an
applicant to be permanently ineligible, and would remain unaware of
any such ineligibilities.


2. For the reasons outlined above, Nairobi requests Washington
concurrence for the reimplementation of the "application received"
stamping until the NIV electronic application tracking system
becomes more reliable.

RANNEBERGER