Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07MUSCAT790
2007-08-19 12:32:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Muscat
Cable title:  

OMAN RESPONSE TO SECTION 527 REQUEST

Tags:  CASC EINV KIDE OPIC PGOV MU 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0008
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHMS #0790/01 2311232
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 191232Z AUG 07
FM AMEMBASSY MUSCAT
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 8629
UNCLAS MUSCAT 000790 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

FOR NEA/ARP, EB/IFD/OIA, L/CID

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CASC EINV KIDE OPIC PGOV MU
SUBJECT: OMAN RESPONSE TO SECTION 527 REQUEST

REF: STATE 55422

UNCLAS MUSCAT 000790

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

FOR NEA/ARP, EB/IFD/OIA, L/CID

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CASC EINV KIDE OPIC PGOV MU
SUBJECT: OMAN RESPONSE TO SECTION 527 REQUEST

REF: STATE 55422


1. (U) In response to reftel request, Embassy submits one case
involving the Omani government that was brought to our
attention by a U.S. citizen who works for a Bahraini-based
company involved in the dispute.


2. (U) Case summary. The United States Government is aware
of one claim against the Government of Oman that has been
settled in favor of the claimant on appeal. In 1998, the
claimant formed a partnership with Omani interests to
construct a hatchery and marine service center. The
claimant, which received assurances from the government that
it could commence operations, produced its first harvest in

2002. Prior to this first harvest, the government informed
the claimant that the company would have to vacate the land.
The claimant pursued legal recourse to recover $54 million in
actual investment and 10 years' estimated net profits. It
won a decision against the government in January 2006 in the
amount of $500,000. Both parties appealed the decision. The
appellate court upheld the initial decision in December 2006.
The claimant has found the amount of compensation to be
insufficient and is considering pursuing this case further
with the government.


3. (SBU) Background. In 1998, the claimant, Bahrain-based
DevCorp, in partnership with the Shanfari family (35%),Grand
Cayman-based Sea Farms International (25%),Yusuf bin Alawi
(10%),and the Dhofar Group (5%),formed Oman International
Shrimp Company (OISC) to begin a hatchery and marine service
center at the Duqm site. OISC collected its first harvest in
July 2002.


4. (SBU) Prior to this harvest, the Ministry of Agriculture
and Fisheries notified OISC on October 13, 2001, that they
would have to vacate the site in order to construct the Duqm
port. On July 21, 2003, the Ministry of Finance issued a
decision stating that no other site would be available for
OISC to transfer its operations. OISC, in turn, sued the
Ministry of Finance in 2003 for damages in the amount of 21
million Omani rials ($54 million). This amount represents
actual investment by the company, as well as an amount of 10
years' loss of net profits, as calculated by KPMG. While
acknowledging that it did not have a lease for the land, OISC
claimed that it had received assurances from the Ministry
that it could develop a shrimp farm on the land, with a land
lease to be forthcoming. It retained Trowers and Hamlins as
its counsel.


5. (SBU) On January 3, 2006, the Administrative Court found
both the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Agriculture
and Fisheries liable in the amount of 189,971 RO ($494,000).
In the decision, the court upheld the principle of
"estoppel," whereby entities are estopped from benefiting
from their own breach of promises. OISC claims, however,
that the judgment is insufficient, as the amount represents
less than 1% of the damages sought, and only 15% of the
actual audited costs of the project.


6. (SBU) OISC appealed the case, claiming that it is due 21
million RO. The ministries appealed the case as well,
claiming that no compensation should be awarded. The
appellate court consolidated all three cases into one, and on
December 26, 2006, issued a decision upholding the lower
court's ruling. In its decision, the appellate court
affirmed the damage estimates calculated by the
administrative court-appointed engineering expert, while
refuting the claims made by OISC for additional compensation
based on (1) the lack of a formal land lease; (2) the fact
that some costs incurred were for the purpose of conducting a
feasibility study (which all companies have to prepare,
whether or not they win the contact); and (3) that the
interest claimed by OISC does not have legal merit under
Oman's commercial law.


7. (SBU) OISC is considering further courses of action,
including the possible submittal of a letter to Sultan Qaboos
bin Said, Oman's head of state. An OISC representative, who
is a U.S. citizen, believes that the Sultan would favor the
company's position if he knew of the case.


8. (SBU) Comment. The Ambassador discussed this case with
Minister of National Economy Ahmed bin Abdul Nabi Macki in
July 2006. Macki was closely familiar with the case, and
noted that he had tried to reach a settlement with the
company before it took his Ministry to court. He pledged
then to honor the court's decision when reached, and
subsequently the Ministry issued a check to OISC in the
amount that was awarded by the appellate court. Of further
note is that Yusuf bin Alawi is the Minister Responsible for
Foreign Affairs. To our knowledge, he has not been active in
the deliberations of this case. End Comment.


GRAPPO