Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07MUMBAI200
2007-04-13 10:53:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Consulate Mumbai
Cable title:
DEMARCHE ON UNSCR 1747
VZCZCXRO3894 PP RUEHBC RUEHDE RUEHDIR RUEHKUK DE RUEHBI #0200 1031053 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P R 131053Z APR 07 FM AMCONSUL MUMBAI TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5276 INFO RUCNIRA/IRAN COLLECTIVE RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 6464 RUEHCI/AMCONSUL KOLKATA 1262 RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI 1382 RUEHDE/AMCONSUL DUBAI 0013 RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU 0579 RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 0743 RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0099 RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI 0212
C O N F I D E N T I A L MUMBAI 000200
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR ISN, ISO AND NEA/IR
TREASURY FOR TFFC
E.O. 12958: DECL: 4/13/2017
TAGS: ETTC KNNP PARM IR IN
SUBJECT: DEMARCHE ON UNSCR 1747
REF: A: STATE 40440; B: NEW DELHI 1702 C: NEW DELHI 1486
CLASSIFIED BY: Michael S. Owen, Consul General, Consulate
General Mumbai, State.
REASON: 1.4 (b),(d)
C O N F I D E N T I A L MUMBAI 000200
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR ISN, ISO AND NEA/IR
TREASURY FOR TFFC
E.O. 12958: DECL: 4/13/2017
TAGS: ETTC KNNP PARM IR IN
SUBJECT: DEMARCHE ON UNSCR 1747
REF: A: STATE 40440; B: NEW DELHI 1702 C: NEW DELHI 1486
CLASSIFIED BY: Michael S. Owen, Consul General, Consulate
General Mumbai, State.
REASON: 1.4 (b),(d)
1. (C) ConGen Mumbai contacted the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
to determine what steps it had taken pursuant to India's
obligations under United Nations Security Council Resolution
1747 - to freeze the assets of Bank Sepah (Iran). Prashant
Saran, the RBI's Chief General Manager, told us that RBI does
not take the decision to freeze assets of any banks but acts
only on instructions from the GOI Ministry of Finance (MoF) or
MoF's Enforcement Directorate, New Delhi. Accordingly, he asked
us to direct our inquiry to Mof. A General Manager of RBI's
foreign exchange department repeated the same message.
2. (C) We also spoke to banks. Per Ref A we understand that
the State Bank of India (SBI),a public sector bank and also
India's largest bank, has a correspondence banking relationship
with Bank Sepah. S. K. Hariharan, Deputy Managing Director of
SBI's international banking division, confirmed that his bank
was aware of the implications of the resolution. He told us
that SBI had instructed its divisions and branches to act with
caution regarding transactions with Bank Sepah. He would not go
into further detail, but referred us to the Foreign Exchange
Dealers' Association of India (FEDAI). P. K. Pain of FEDAI
confirmed that FEDAI alerted its membership to the resolution
and issued instructions to its member banks to be cautious in
dealing with Bank Sepah. He refused to provide more details
including the question of freezing of assets saying it is
confidential. Sanjay Chougule, compliance officer with ICICI
SIPDIS
Bank, India's largest private sector bank, confirmed that his
bank's compliance monitoring systems had already noted the
resolution; the systems would prevent anyone in the bank from
closing a transaction with Bank Sepah, he told us.
3. (C) Comment: We do not expect that the RBI will be any more
forthcoming on this issue and will continue to refer the U.S.
Mission to the MoF, which takes the lead on freezing assets.
However, industry reactions do show that the Indian banking
market is already aware of the implications of the resolution,
and that at least two of the largest banks in the country may
have ceased all transactions with Bank Sepah. End comment.
OWEN
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR ISN, ISO AND NEA/IR
TREASURY FOR TFFC
E.O. 12958: DECL: 4/13/2017
TAGS: ETTC KNNP PARM IR IN
SUBJECT: DEMARCHE ON UNSCR 1747
REF: A: STATE 40440; B: NEW DELHI 1702 C: NEW DELHI 1486
CLASSIFIED BY: Michael S. Owen, Consul General, Consulate
General Mumbai, State.
REASON: 1.4 (b),(d)
1. (C) ConGen Mumbai contacted the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
to determine what steps it had taken pursuant to India's
obligations under United Nations Security Council Resolution
1747 - to freeze the assets of Bank Sepah (Iran). Prashant
Saran, the RBI's Chief General Manager, told us that RBI does
not take the decision to freeze assets of any banks but acts
only on instructions from the GOI Ministry of Finance (MoF) or
MoF's Enforcement Directorate, New Delhi. Accordingly, he asked
us to direct our inquiry to Mof. A General Manager of RBI's
foreign exchange department repeated the same message.
2. (C) We also spoke to banks. Per Ref A we understand that
the State Bank of India (SBI),a public sector bank and also
India's largest bank, has a correspondence banking relationship
with Bank Sepah. S. K. Hariharan, Deputy Managing Director of
SBI's international banking division, confirmed that his bank
was aware of the implications of the resolution. He told us
that SBI had instructed its divisions and branches to act with
caution regarding transactions with Bank Sepah. He would not go
into further detail, but referred us to the Foreign Exchange
Dealers' Association of India (FEDAI). P. K. Pain of FEDAI
confirmed that FEDAI alerted its membership to the resolution
and issued instructions to its member banks to be cautious in
dealing with Bank Sepah. He refused to provide more details
including the question of freezing of assets saying it is
confidential. Sanjay Chougule, compliance officer with ICICI
SIPDIS
Bank, India's largest private sector bank, confirmed that his
bank's compliance monitoring systems had already noted the
resolution; the systems would prevent anyone in the bank from
closing a transaction with Bank Sepah, he told us.
3. (C) Comment: We do not expect that the RBI will be any more
forthcoming on this issue and will continue to refer the U.S.
Mission to the MoF, which takes the lead on freezing assets.
However, industry reactions do show that the Indian banking
market is already aware of the implications of the resolution,
and that at least two of the largest banks in the country may
have ceased all transactions with Bank Sepah. End comment.
OWEN