Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07LUSAKA887
2007-08-03 09:33:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Lusaka
Cable title:  

ZAMBIAN NGO BILL--CIVIL SOCIETY AND DONOR CONCERNS

Tags:  PGOV EAID ZA 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO0343
RR RUEHBZ RUEHDU RUEHJO RUEHMR RUEHRN
DE RUEHLS #0887/01 2150933
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 030933Z AUG 07
FM AMEMBASSY LUSAKA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4725
INFO RUCNSAD/SOUTHERN AF DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY COLLECTIVE
RUEHLMC/MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORP 0021
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 LUSAKA 000887 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS
SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV EAID ZA
SUBJECT: ZAMBIAN NGO BILL--CIVIL SOCIETY AND DONOR CONCERNS

LUSAKA 00000887 001.2 OF 003


UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 LUSAKA 000887

SIPDIS

SIPDIS
SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV EAID ZA
SUBJECT: ZAMBIAN NGO BILL--CIVIL SOCIETY AND DONOR CONCERNS

LUSAKA 00000887 001.2 OF 003



1. (SBU) Summary: An NGO Bill that the Zambian government presented
to Parliament on July 17 has met significant opposition from civil
society. NGO representatives noted they were not consulted in the
drafting process and raised concerns about the amount of power the
Bill provides to the government over NGO activities. Donor community
representatives expressed concerns about the proposed Bill to the
Minister of Justice on July 31, and he responded that he was willing
to consider their detailed and constructive suggestions. The
Ambassador raised the possibility that the Bill might affect
Millennium Challenge Account governance indicator assessments. End
summary.

--------------
Background
--------------


2. (U) Since 1997 Zambian non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have
advocated for a separate law that distinguishes NGO registrations
from other organizations like clubs, churches, and political
parties. Currently, registration of all these organizations falls
under the Zambian Societies Act, managed by the Ministry of Home
Affairs. In 2000, the Government of the Republic of Zambia (GRZ)
attempted to put forth an NGO bill to "register and regulate all
NGOs in Zambia." This bill was met with significant opposition from
civil society and it was dropped.

--------------
Recent Developments
--------------


3. (SBU) On July 17, Minister of Justice, George Kunda presented to
Parliament a Non-Governmental Organizations Bill "as a message from
the President." Despite the fact that NGOs have been seeking an NGO
law, no one from civil society or the public had participated in the
development of the Bill before July 17. The Parliamentary Committee
on Legal Affairs, Governance, Human Rights, and Gender Matters is
reviewing the Bill and will make recommendations to Members of
Parliament on August 3, 2007. This period from July 17 to August 3
is the only time the GRZ has given the public to address any
components of the Bill and they must do so by soliciting an
appointment with the Committee members.


4. (U) According to press reports, the GRZ argued that the current
Bill is necessary because, although the government is always held
accountable, NGOs do not properly account for the money they receive

or for their expenditures. The Minister of Information and
Broadcasting, Mike Mulongoti, stated that it is "necessary to have a
legal framework to regulate their conduct, because some of them seem
to have been set up specifically to oppose the government in
everything." Mulongoti also noted, "After all, even the money they
[NGOs] use to fund their activities is taxpayer's money elsewhere,
just like we use Zambian taxpayers' money."


5. (U) The Bill establishes an NGO Board (funded by Parliamentary
allocations and managed by the Ministry of Home Affairs) that will
be composed of ten part-time members (occupying three year
positions),all appointed by the Minister. Only two positions will
be appointed by the Minister to represent "the diverse areas of
interest of the non-governmental organisations." Among other
functions, the Board will "regulate the work, and the area of work,
of non-governmental organisations operating in Zambia," review
quarterly and annual NGO reports, and establish guidelines for
auditing NGO's accounts. The Board will also advise the GRZ on NGOs'
activities, "provide policy guidelines... for harmonizing their
activities to the national development plan for Zambia," and
"approve the code of conduct...for the self regulation [of NGOs] and
their operations in Zambia." Furthermore, the Board only requires a
quorum of six to act (meaning decisions could be completely GRZ-led)
and has the power to fine and/or imprison up to five years for
certain offenses, or to even suspend or cancel an NGO's Certificate
of Registration -- denying its authorization to operate in Zambia.


6. (SBU) This Bill will effectively render NGOs subject to the GRZ's
interests, which may conflict with donor interests. It gives a
significant amount of power to the Board to reject new NGOs or shut
down existing ones. For example, the Board can reject an application
if an NGO's "proposed activities or procedures... are not in the
national interest."


7. (U) The Bill requires that NGOs reveal their funding sources and
it also gives the Minister power to determine the proportion of
funds an NGO can use towards its administrative costs. Additionally,
it assigns the NGO Board with the responsibility to distribute the
assets and liabilities of any NGO that ceases to exist. It also
states that the "Minister is empowered to set the terms and
conditions for the importation and use of any equipment required by
an NGO for its activities." International NGOs with activities in
Zambia will not be able to operate without registering under this
Act.

--------------

LUSAKA 00000887 002.2 OF 003


Civil Society Response
--------------


8. (U) The Zambia Council for Social Development (ZCSD) took the
lead in organizing a civil society response. ZCSD, the Civil Society
for Poverty Reduction (CSPR) and the Non-governmental Organizations'
Coordinating Council (NGOCC),an NGO umbrella group, made a joint
statement opposing the Bill on the basis of its non-inclusive
drafting process. The independent daily Post newspaper published
this statement on Sunday, July 15. The ZCSD held a meeting on July
19, which about 50 people attended (approximately 10 from the donor
community; the remainder from NGOs and international NGOs) and
discussed a strategy and work plan, as well as the need for a clear,
focused message dealing with the critical issues of the Bill and not
just the process of how the Bill was developed (without consultation
or input from civil society). Furthermore, the NGO community
recognized that it will be competing for attention from the media,
the public, and MPs, with the ongoing debate on the constitutional
reform process.


9. (U) On July 27, the ZCSD shared a legal response addressing
specific clauses of the Bill with civil society as well as the donor
community. ZCSD presented the response to the parliamentary
committee reviewing the Bill on July 30. In addition to the issues
of contention highlighted above (paras 5, 6 and 7),the response
from ZCSD points out that the Bill calls for the Board to audit NGOs
with no provision for an auditor or accountant to be on the Board
and that the Bill omits the terms "human rights" and "advocacy" from
the definition of NGO activities. ZCSD's legal response concludes
that the Bill "does not create any facilitative process in the work
of NGOs but rather is just a regulatory framework for the operations
of NGOs in the country."


10. (SBU) On Saturday July 28, the ZCSD organized a public street
concert to raise awareness about the Bill and collect signatures for
a petition. Members of civil society also picketed at Parliament on
July 31. Leadership of other NGOs such as the YWCA, Transparency
International and Southern African Centre for the Constructive
Resolution of Disputes (SACCORD) told EmbOffs that they presented
position papers and/or recommendations to the parliamentary
committee reviewing the Bill on July 30. The recommendations made by
the YWCA were very pointed and thorough. Among a list of 20
recommendations, the YWCA proposed that the NGO Board require a
quorum of "50 percent NGOs and 50 percent government," that the
Board only request annual (vice quarterly) reports from NGOs, that
the ZCSD fill the role of the Zambian Congress of NGOs proposed by
the Bill, and that the NGO Board not have the power to determine an
NGO's administrative spending since "this is always agreed upon with
the various cooperating partners."

--------------
Donor Response
--------------


11. (SBU) On July 26, senior representatives from the donor
community met at UNDP offices in Lusaka to discuss the NGO Bill and
prepare a strategy for a July 31 briefing with the Minister of
Justice, George Kunda. Discussion focused on issues that need to be
clarified within the Bill; the Bill's problematic areas; the
negative repercussions the Bill may have in the international arena
for assessment of GRZ's levels of accountability, democracy, and
governance; and the communication strategy to be used when meeting
with Kunda. The donor group selected three representatives to meet
with Kunda on July 31: Ambassador Martinez, the Irish Ambassador
(representing the EU presidency on behalf of Portugal) and the UN
Resident Coordinator.


12. (SBU) At the meeting, Kunda was joined by Zambian Attorney
General Malila, along with several staffers from the Ministry's
Parliamentary Committee (who are working with parliamentarians on
revisions to the draft language). The nearly ninety-minute meeting
was frank, yet cordial. The three donor reps presented many of the
same concerns raised by civil society -- with special emphasis on
the need to rethink the composition of the NGO Board, the
inappropriate involvement of government in the administrative
operations of NGOs, and the unnecessary reporting burdens that the
Bill imposes.


13. (SBU) The donor representatives stressed that the ramifications
of the Bill went beyond a national vision for regulating NGOs and
could have a negative impact on many of the indicators used by the
UN and EU member states, and also by the USG, to measure Zambia's
progress on governance issues. (Note: the Minister and the Attorney
General paid particular attention when the Ambassador spoke of how
an overly restrictive NGO Bill could negatively impact Zambia's MCA
indicators -- even reading out several indicator descriptions from
the "Ruling Justly Category" to make her point. End note.)


14. (SBU) Both the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General
thanked the donor reps repeatedly for raising many issues that they
said had, in some instances, simply been overlooked, drafted

LUSAKA 00000887 003.2 OF 003


incorrectly, or needed more consultation. They said they would
"take on board" and seriously consider the following suggestions:

- the composition of the NGO Board should be equally divided between
government and NGO representatives (five and five, rather than eight
and two),with a quorum of six required to authorize any decisions
by the Board.

- the Minister of Home Affairs should not have the authority to
determine what percentage of an NGO's budget is to be devoted to
administrative costs, if the NGO receives no funding from the GRZ.

- the GRZ should continue to allow NGOs to submit annual reports and
not require quarterly reports since the Board would be absolutely
unable to cope with examining nearly 50,000 reports from
approximately 12,000 NGOs.

- the Bill should not prescribe deregistration for an NGO that loses
its paper registration certificate as all records of any NGO's
registration would be available electronically and a duplicate could
be easily issued.

--------------
Comment
--------------


15. (SBU) The underlying tone of the Bill is defensive. The GRZ
seems most concerned with regulating and controlling civil society,
in contrast to the 2000 Malawi NGO Act, which seeks "to provide for
the rights and obligations of Non-Governmental Organisations in
Malawi, to promote the development and values of strong independent
civil society..." Furthermore, the timing of the NGO Bill
(introduced in the midst of debate over the constitutional reform
process) and the lack of consultation with civil society lead us to
wonder if this Bill may have other motives. President Mwanawasa's
recent attack on NGOs in early July, in which he stated that civil
society should not be allowed to "hijack" the constitution-making
process, echoes the defensive tone of the NGO Bill.


16. (SBU) In response to concerns over the manner in which the Bill
has been pushed through quickly without consulting civil society,
Kunda stated that "intention of the law was not to gag NGOs." Both
the Minister and Attorney General insisted that, due to the
legislative calendar, if the Bill is not passed by August 10, it
will lapse, with the possible result that it would not be
reintroduced this year or even next year. Given the prevalent
bureaucratic inertia surrounding most government programs, in theory
this sense of urgency is refreshing. We will be much more confident
in the GRZ's good intentions if it changes the Bill in response to
concerns raised by donors and civil society.

MARTINEZ