Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07KIGALI917
2007-10-11 07:50:00
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
Embassy Kigali
Cable title:  

2200 RWANDANS RETURN FROM UGANDA

Tags:  PREF PREL PHUM RW 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0026
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHLGB #0917/01 2840750
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 110750Z OCT 07
FM AMEMBASSY KIGALI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4770
INFO RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS 0146
RUEHJB/AMEMBASSY BUJUMBURA 0152
RUEHDR/AMEMBASSY DAR ES SALAAM 0965
RUEHKM/AMEMBASSY KAMPALA 1721
RUEHKI/AMEMBASSY KINSHASA 0294
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 0114
RUEHNR/AMEMBASSY NAIROBI 1019
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0334
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0267
C O N F I D E N T I A L KIGALI 000917 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/11/2017
TAGS: PREF PREL PHUM RW
SUBJECT: 2200 RWANDANS RETURN FROM UGANDA

REF: KAMPALA 1542

Classified By: Ambassador Michael R. Arietti, reason 1.4 (B/D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L KIGALI 000917

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/11/2017
TAGS: PREF PREL PHUM RW
SUBJECT: 2200 RWANDANS RETURN FROM UGANDA

REF: KAMPALA 1542

Classified By: Ambassador Michael R. Arietti, reason 1.4 (B/D)


1. (SBU) Summary. Post has confirmed recent press reports
of the repatriation of approximately 2200 Rwandans who had
settled in the Kibati region of Uganda, near the Tanzanian
border. Most press accounts depicted forced movement on
little notice although the pro-government New Times offered
accounts of a long-anticipated journey home by a willing and
readied population. The governments of Rwanda and Uganda
jointly carried out the repatriation, and while each
described a peaceful process, it was not a voluntary movement
of the camp population (reftel). All have apparently been
sent to their home communities for resettlement. End summary.


2. (SBU) Following media reports about the repatriation of
2200 Rwandans from Uganda, Embassy personnel spoke with
Innocent Ngango, Executive Secretary of the Rwandan National
Council for Refugees, about the details of the return
process. Ngango said 586 men, 516 women, and 1117 children
were repatriated, more than 80 percent of whom were from the
former Kibungo prefecture. Some had originally fled to
Tanzania in the aftermath of the 1994 genocide, then moved to
Uganda in 2001 when their refugee status was revoked, and
others arrived in Kibati by other routes and at other times.
He further reported that all of the returnees have already
been resettled in their home villages after stays of two to
three days in the Rukomo Transit Center near Gicumbi District
(near the town of Byumba). According to Ngango, the
returnees will receive no further assistance in reintegrating
into their former communities, although the Rwandan Foreign
Minister stated publicly that some assistance would be
offered.


3. (C) The deportation agreement was reached by the
governments of Rwanda and Uganda in a July tripartite meeting
attended by UNHCR, which agreed to assist "on humanitarian
grounds." Ngango said the government of Rwanda (GOR) had
years of reports concerning the recruiting efforts by the
Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) among
the largely Hutu group at the camp in Uganda, and the
possible presence of individuals who had participated in the
1994 genocide. Crimes supposedly committed by the returnees
against the local Ugandan community served as further reason
on the Ugandan side, he said, for their return. A
representative from UNHCR who attended the July meeting told
PolOff that the repatriation called for in the agreement was
"not necessarily voluntary," but officials from both
governments and the UNHCR have "taken the public position
that it was." (FYI. Point 7 of the joint communiqu issued
after the July meeting says, "In cooperation with the
Government of Rwanda, the Government of Uganda shall
facilitate the repatriation of the 'Kibati' caseload within
one month (August 2007)." End FYI.)


4. (C) Because the returnees were not granted refugee status
at any time during their stay in Uganda, they were not under
UNHCR's mandate, a situation described by the UNHCR
representative as a "failure" of the organization to resolve
status disputes years earlier. The governments of Rwanda and
Uganda did not coordinate the repatriation with UNHCR,
according to UNHCR and other embassy contacts, and neither
UNHCR or other organizations took part. UNHCR and other
refugee organizations were informed of the arrival of
returnees only after they reached the Rukomo Transit Center
on the Rwandan side of the border. UNHCR provided some
humanitarian assistance in the form of water tanks for the
center when contacted by the GOR. Separately, UNHCR head
Annette Nyekan told embassy officers that "several thousand"
Kibati camp inhabitants had escaped the roundup, having left
the camp in the days before the return exercise.


5. (SBU) Comment. The assessment of the repatriation by
UNHCR Uganda seems to be a bit more positive than UNHCR
Rwanda (reftel). The limited involvement of UNHCR was
understandable given the returnees' non-refugee status. The
Ugandan government has long wished to expel this population
from its territory, and the GOR, with doubts of its own
regarding activities at the camp, agreed to the return. The
success of the repatriation depends ultimately on the
returnees' reception in their home communities and the extent
of assistance available to them. End comment.


ARIETTI