Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07ISTANBUL116
2007-02-15 11:45:00
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
Consulate Istanbul
Cable title:  

AMCONSULATE ISTANBUL RECEIVES PURPORTED OCALAN

Tags:  PGOV PREL PTER TU IZ 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO8698
OO RUEHBC RUEHDBU RUEHDE RUEHFL RUEHIHL RUEHKUK RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV
RUEHSR
DE RUEHIT #0116/01 0461145
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 151145Z FEB 07
FM AMCONSUL ISTANBUL
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 6609
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCNRAQ/IRAQ COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEPGAB/MNF-I C2X BAGHDAD IZ PRIORITY
RUQNIZM/425ABS IZMIR TU PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
RUFOADA/JAC MOLESWORTH RAF MOLESWORTH UK PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUETITH/ODC ANKARA TU PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/39ABG INCIRLIK AB TU PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHAK/USDAO ANKARA TU PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 06 ISTANBUL 000116 

SIPDIS

NOFORN
SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/SE, SECDEF FOR
USDP:PDUSDP/ISA:EUR/ISA:NESA, JOINT STAFF WASHDC FOR
J-3/J-5, 425ABS IZMIR TU FOR CC,

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/07/2017
TAGS: PGOV PREL PTER TU IZ
SUBJECT: AMCONSULATE ISTANBUL RECEIVES PURPORTED OCALAN
LETTER


Classified By: CG Deborah K. Jones for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 06 ISTANBUL 000116

SIPDIS

NOFORN
SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/SE, SECDEF FOR
USDP:PDUSDP/ISA:EUR/ISA:NESA, JOINT STAFF WASHDC FOR
J-3/J-5, 425ABS IZMIR TU FOR CC,

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/07/2017
TAGS: PGOV PREL PTER TU IZ
SUBJECT: AMCONSULATE ISTANBUL RECEIVES PURPORTED OCALAN
LETTER


Classified By: CG Deborah K. Jones for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).


1. (C/NF) Consulate has received a letter purporting to be
from jailed PKK leader Abullah Ocalan. The envelope was
postmarked January 11, 2007, from Beyoglu, Istanbul and
addressed to ConGen Istanbul's former Beyoglu office
building. The Asrin Law Firm, responsible for Abdullah
Ocalan's legal defense in Turkey, is the return address. The
letter purporting to be from Ocalan and the law firm's cover
letter were in Turkish and prepared and printed using
computer word processing. The "ABD Baskonsoloslugu,na" ("to
the U.S. Consulate") salutation on the law firm's cover
letter is the only hand-lettered portion appearing on the
text received. The Danish and Canadian Embassies informed
Embassy Ankara that they had received the same text.


2. (C/NF) Embassy Ankara passed the letter February 14 to
MFA Director General for Security Affairs (S/CT-equivalent)
Hayati Guven, who told us he was aware of the letter and that
Ocalan's law firm had sent it to a number of diplomatic
missions.


3. (C/NF) Begin text of cover letter:

To the American Consulate General

Ocalan, kidnapped on an international level in February,
1999, was turned over to Turkey and has been detained on the
Island of Imrali since that date. He spends 23 hours per day
in a prison that houses a single prisoner in a twelve square
meter area. The implementation of the new sentence execution
system that was developed along with 2005 laws, is highly
restrictive and anti-democratic, and when applied to Ocalan,
it is interpreted significantly more narrowly. In addition,
due to the position and status of the Imrali Prison, existing
limitations on his rights are compounded by the de-facto
obstacles that prevent foremost his rights of defense and
communication, along with many other rights. Further, the
unjust and inappropriate accusations and speculation that

Ocalan has been subject to has been contributing to the
maintenance of a lynching culture within society, constantly
keeping him on the agenda. He has been in a prison housing a
single prisoner on Imrali Island for nearly eight years,
subject to special and discriminatory treatment, under very
heavy conditions of seclusion and isolation from life and
society.

Some political circles and media outlets frequently create
unrealistic, unjust and inappropriate accusations and
speculation regarding Ocalan. The conditions under which he
is detained and speculative comments regarding his thoughts
are perceived especially by politicians with a narrow-minded,
nationalist approach, and those who evaluate Turkey,s
problems in the framework of their own political interests,
as a vehicle for political profit.

In contrast to this, serious reaction and democratic
activities have developed in protest of the seclusion and
isolation of Ocalan. Along with many hunger strikes and
press releases, the public closely followed the request for
gatherings for demonstrations protesting the separation that
resulted in complete isolation from the world, that were to
take place in Gemlik, the closest point to Imrali Island, in
2003 and 2005, with participants especially from the regions
where the Kurdish population in Turkey reside. In addition
to the conditions of seclusion and isolation, data which is
reflective of Kurdish acceptance of Ocalan politically, and
how his political views and stance are determining factors
for Kurds, is evident when considering the petition campaign
carried out in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Turkey and all nations
where Kurds live or have migrated to, in which 3,243,627

ISTANBUL 00000116 002 OF 006


Kurdish individuals age 16 and over signed on to the motto,
"I accept Ocalan as representing my political will," despite
all of the obstacles placed before both those carrying out
the survey and those who participated in it. This
development clearly demonstrates that in the context of the
perspective and political views of Ocalan, he is one of the
most important addressees of this issue.

With the hope of coming to a just, free and permanent
resolution to the Kurdish Issue, Ocalan has created a period
in which the suspension of armed conflict took place exactly
five times, and in order to seek a resolution through
dialogue, Ocalan has attempted to declare unilateral
cease-fires. These efforts, while leading to important
developments in terms of mutual dialogue and democratic,
peaceful methods to resolving the Kurdish issue,
unfortunately have not sufficed. Most recently, he has made
a major effort to establish a cease-fire on 1 October 2006.

The undeniable reality that the Kurdish Issue is the
underlying factor in the foundation of all Turkey,s problems
is something that everybody accepts without question. The
question of what kind of an attitude will this issue be
addressed with, is not one that is pertinent only to those of
Kurdish ethnicity, but to all of those who live in this
region or have something to do with this region, and the
answer to the question of "what kind of a future do we want"
is also contained in its response. As a requisite for the
responsibility that we have towards our client, we want to
overcome the inaccurate information that is prevalent in
society regarding the conditions under which he is detained,
as well as the inaccurate information about Ocalan,s
contentious, and by this means, to overcome the societal
isolation against our client by sharing with you Ocalan,s
thoughts on the resolution of Turkey,s problems and the
Kurdish issue. With our respects, January 2007 Asrin Law
Firm.

End text.


4. (C/NF) Begin text of Ocalan letter:

Twenty-eight Kurdish rebellions have taken place throughout
the 84-year history of the Republic, and the problems that we
are experiencing today have at their source the Kurdish Issue
that has been sentenced to a deadlock. The resolution to
existing problems can only be achieved by way of responding
to the problems of Kurdish liberation, and in light of the
reality that concepts such as justice and freedom can only be
achieved in societies where they are shared equally, I
believe that as a requirement of the historical obligation I
have towards you and towards our people, my efforts, although
expressed only in the form of main ideas, should be known by
you.

A lot of effort must be made in terms of the attempt to
create an environment without conflict during this time at
which we are at an important curve in the road. I think that
it is known that our efforts are not new. We have made
various attempts for the democratic and peaceful resolution
of the Kurdish issue in 1999 and previously. But these
attempts were fruitless.

There are several reasons for the inconclusiveness of these
attempts. Our attempts were always considered to be a
"weakness." Each time, the PKK and Ocalan were assessed as
being in the final hour and these attempts were construed as
mere tactics, and assessments and propaganda continued to the
effect that if more pressure is applied on the PKK they will
come undone. Actions were taken in this manner. There were
significant tendencies. However none of them produced

ISTANBUL 00000116 003 OF 006


results. It is not possible to resolve the Kurdish issue by
means of weapons and force. Despite positive approaches by
several parties during the period from 99-2005, our efforts
towards peace were assessed as a weakness and approached as
such. Our friends who came as ambassadors of peace were even
detained and imprisoned. I am not afraid of death or war.
For this reason, the assessments of weakness were very wrong
assessments. The fact that the attempts were fruitless can
be attributed a great deal to these wrong assessments.

Whether it is the deaths of the soldiers or the guerillas, I
felt a great deal of pain because of what we experienced. My
conditions are difficult. Perhaps nobody in Turkey lives
under these conditions. But I have continued my peace
efforts constantly, regardless. Despite my conditions, I
have made significant efforts; I have constantly warned and
produced solutions. For more than 10 years, our efforts
towards peace have continued but the point at which we stand
now is obvious as well, the bloodshed continues. In addition
to all of the calls and the developing process I again
appealed for a unilateral cease-fire, and as 1 October 2006
the PKK announced that as long as they weren,t threatened
with being eradicated, they would not use violence, that is,
they announced a unilateral cease-fire.

Some meaning has to be imparted on this stance. In light of
what we have experienced, righteous Kurds and Turks, those
segments and groups in Turkey with common sense, those in
favor of democracy, have voiced their desire for the need for
immediate peace, and that to accomplish this, a first step
towards stopping the conflict must be taken. They have
emphasized at every opportunity that the bloodshed must stop
and that they are ready to assume responsibility to
accomplish this. The government and political circles must
also make an effort to develop democracy and peace in
accordance with this position.

The transformation of the cease-fire that was initiated on 1
October 2006 into a permanent peace, carries great
importance. If taken advantage of, this process that will
start with orientation can take on the form of the Democratic
Establishment of the Republic. The enthusiasm, excitement,
dynamism and unity were experienced during the initial days
of the establishment (of the Republic) can be achieved again.
The Prime Minister said something. I placed a lot of value
on that. He said we will make Turkey a different country
that can serve as a model for the Middle East. This is our
goal as well. If our thoughts are taken into consideration,
if we accomplish peace, Turkey will make leaps forward in
every way, its economy will be strengthened, it,s dignity in
Middle Eastern policies will increase, it will be a model for
the Middle East. We can make Turkey a country that is a
model for the Middle East with its own unique conditions.
Peace in the Middle East can only be accomplished with the
democratic unity of Turks and Kurds.

The National Pact that was passed in the Grand National
Assembly in 1919 must be adapted to today. The move that was
made in that period for the establishment of the Republic is
needed today for the establishment of democracy. In fact, we
can call this a Democracy Pact; the 1921 Constitution was a
modern constitution which formed the Republic. We want that
constitution which was valid during that period, with the
exception of those aspects of it that may be considerate
outdated, applied again today. We share a common history, a
common culture, and a common struggle in the establishment of
the Republic. The victory of the Republic as a result of the
struggle by Mustafa Kemal in the 1920,s, is a victory that
belongs as much to the Kurds as it does to the Turks. In
fact, Mustafa Kemal sent Sheik Mahmut Berzenci an ambassador.
This struggle is as much a Kurdish struggle for national

ISTANBUL 00000116 004 OF 006


freedom as it is a Turkish struggle.

Three times in history, Turks and Kurds formed strategic
alliances. In addition to the common success of the Turks
and Kurds as a result of the alliance formed during the War
of Independence, they formed strategic alliances during the
Yavuz period as well as during the Alpasian period in 1701.
Alpasian formed an alliance with the Kurds and entered
Anatolia against Romas Emperor Romanus IV Diogenes. With his
arrival in the Silvan region, he formed cooperation foremost
with the Kurds of the Mervani Kurdish Principality. As a
result, the Kurds facilitated Alpasian,s victory by
supporting him with 10,000 troops. In the same way during
the Yavuz period, Yavuz was able to enter the Middle East
after securing his alliance with the Kurds. The form of
today,s Turkey-Iran border was shaped during that period.
After securing the alliance and winning battles in Caldiran,
Mercidabik, and Ridaniye, Yavuz became the sovereign in
Syria, Arabia, and Egypt...that is to say, in the Middle East.

Today, with the facilitation of a 4th Turkish-Kurdish
Democracy Alliance, Turkey should set itself free of this
difficult and dangerous situation. We can only be set free
of this situation by carrying out a "Democratic Conquest" of
the entire Middle East based on the brotherhood of Turks and
Kurds. As I have persistently emphasized, a culture of
Democracy should be put into place in the Middle East by
facilitating a Turkish-Kurdish alliance. A new and
democratic alliance can lead to democratization in Turkey and
this culture of democracy can be spread throughout the entire
Middle East. There is a serious lack of a culture of
democracy throughout the Middle East. Politics and society
in the Middle East must be democratized. Sovereigns dictated
their despotic state concepts at the beginning of the last
century, and we lost the 20th century. If the Middle East
does not democratize, we will lose another century.

All segments that are sensitive to this and fell obliged, the
resolution that I am suggesting to the Turkish society is
broad in its dimensions. Our desire is for a Democratic
nation. We have no objections to a unitary state and to the
Republic. However, Kurds should be able to organize
democratically and realize their democratic expansion of
culture, language, economics and the environment as well as
other areas. Kurds, Turks and other cultures together
comprise the Democratic Turkish Nation. This can only be
achieved as a result of the concept of a democratic nation, a
democratic constitution and developed legal system that is
multi-cultural.

We accept the Republic, the unitary state, and secularism.
However, we believe that the democratic state must be
redefined on the basis of peoples and respect for peoples and
cultures. At the establishment of the Republic, we took our
places as original elements of the Republic. Ataturk formed
the Republic and this establishment has remained in a very
narrow framework. Indeed the establishment of the Republic
is important but now what is most important is the
democratization of the Republic. Let us come together to
facilitate the democratic rebuilding of the Republic, because
only this democratic rebuilding can be a solution to our
problem. This is what we want. This must be well
understood. Our democratic nation concept does not have a
problem with a flag or border.

The assimilation and denial of different ethnic identities
and politics that are built upon the destruction of them in
the most extreme sense should be seen as overcome in the form
of states that they create. These approaches that are based
on the axis of Europe have been overcome in Europe long ago.
I will not get into along debate about how Spain and ETA,

ISTANBUL 00000116 005 OF 006


Basque, Catalan, and England with Scotland, Whales and
Ireland and Belgium,s similar problems were resolved, there
are many more examples. I am not suggesting that we apply
the exact same resolutions. The world is full of examples,
and they should be used, but we cannot wait for a resolution
to come from the outside, we must develop it within
ourselves. For this, I am emphasizing once again the
importance of democratic dialogue. Dialogue is a must. We
have previously had high-level meetings, and we can have them
again. Especially since we have the people,s elected
officials and limited as it may be, we also have developments
in the area of non-governmental organizations. We won,t
have difficulty in finding people to have discussions with.
It won,t be the end of the world. It will be better for
Turkey. The economy will get better and society will be able
to take a breath.

There are four major people in the Middle East. These are
the Kurds, Arabs, Persians and Turks. The voluntary unity of
these major peoples can create a democratic unity in its
foundation. Iran, Turkey, Syria and Iraq are states where
Kurds live. If these states resolve the Kurdish Issue within
the framework of a democratic nation, democracy will be
dominant in the entire Middle East, and will spread to the
world from there.

We should put before us what is currently necessary to
resolve the issue. A Democratic Action Plan pertinent to
today can be realized. It is important for a Truth and
Justice Research Commission to be established for the
resolution of the issue. Let us mutually forgive each other.
Not necessarily forgiveness but let us expose our mutual
mistakes, admit to them, and expose the truth. Compromise
can only be done in this manner. This commission can be
comprised of intellectuals, bar associations, attorneys that
are members of bar associations, experts from medical
associations, renowned academics from universities, and
professors, for example. If we get to the point of
abandoning our weapons, we can only abandon them to a
commission such as this one. This commission should
facilitate justice and commit to justice. Without justice,
who can we abandon our weapons to? Where the State or the
organization fall short, the intellectuals may intervene.
This is a third area. We have witnessed experiences such as
this in various parts of the world such as Sierra Leone,
Spain-ETA, Ireland, and South Africa. What they do is play
the role of a sort of referee. They force both sides towards
a just resolution for peace. Society should work for the
resolution of all of these problems.

If the process concludes negatively, if it is determined that
the efforts for a cease-fire are used for daily politics, a
very nasty picture will emerge. We will lose our chance for
peace. If a game is to be played, it is certain that the
consequences of this game will be very dangerous. There is
the possibility of the emergence of dozens of groups that are
out of control. This won,t be like the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict, either. It will be much worse. There will be such
chaos that we will all be overcome by it. I am expressing
the possibilities, I am warning that these dangers should be
considered and that the process should be approached with
this sense of responsibility. Turkey cannot be in a position
to enter the European Union before it resolves this issue.
As long as the Kurdish issue is left unresolved, as long as
Turkey does not resolve its issues in a democratic manner,
other issues such as the Cyprus issue, the Armenian issue,
the Assuri Syrian issue, the Pontus Greek issue, and other
issues will be confronting Turkey.

Turkey should show its ability to correctly view and analyze
its own reality and the Kurdish reality. Every state that

ISTANBUL 00000116 006 OF 006


fails to see these realities will inevitably fall into
crisis. For Turkey, to live in a just and democratic state
the resolution to existing problems can only be achieved by
way of responding to the problems of Kurdish liberation, and
in light of the reality that concepts such as justice and
freedom can only be achieved in societies where they are
shared equally. The important thing is not only for the
period of a suspension of conflict to last, but to carry this
period to a successful conclusion. Abdullah Ocalan.

End text.
JONES