Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07CHENNAI187
2007-03-10 11:23:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Consulate Chennai
Cable title:  

INDIA'S SECURITY CONCERNS OVER CHINESE BIDDER FORCES

Tags:  ECON EINV EIND EWWT PGOV IN CN 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1973
RR RUEHCN RUEHGH RUEHVC
DE RUEHCG #0187/01 0691123
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 101123Z MAR 07
FM AMCONSUL CHENNAI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0728
INFO RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 2339
RUEHCI/AMCONSUL KOLKATA 0727
RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI 4991
RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO 1308
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 1069
RUEHMS/AMEMBASSY MUSCAT 0012
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 CHENNAI 000187 

SIPDIS

C O R R E C T E D COPY (ADDED INFO ADDRESSEE)

SENSITIVE

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EINV EIND EWWT PGOV IN CN
SUBJECT: INDIA'S SECURITY CONCERNS OVER CHINESE BIDDER FORCES
KERALA TO REBID PORT PROJECT

REF: NEW DELHI 871

CHENNAI 00000187 001.4 OF 002


UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 CHENNAI 000187

SIPDIS

C O R R E C T E D COPY (ADDED INFO ADDRESSEE)

SENSITIVE

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EINV EIND EWWT PGOV IN CN
SUBJECT: INDIA'S SECURITY CONCERNS OVER CHINESE BIDDER FORCES
KERALA TO REBID PORT PROJECT

REF: NEW DELHI 871

CHENNAI 00000187 001.4 OF 002



1. (SBU) SUMMARY: The leftist government in the southeastern Indian
state of Kerala has been forced to rebid a $1 billion port project
due to the Government of India's refusal - over security concerns -
to authorize the participation of two Chinese corporations in the
winning proposal. Kerala officials believe the proposed port's
natural depth and close proximity to international shipping routes
give it the potential to attract transshipment business presently
handled at Colombo, Singapore and Salalah, Oman. However, skeptics
note that the central government's Shipping Minister, from
neighboring Tamil Nadu, is bent on promoting a competing project in
his home state. END SUMMARY


2. (SBU) Abandoning a long effort to pressure the Center to approve
security clearance for a Chinese consortium to develop Kerala's
Vizhinjam port, the state's leftist government has decided to move
on and retender the $1 billion project. Kerala Port Minister M.
Vijayakumar of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) told Post that
the Government of Kerala would soon invite fresh global tenders. He
refuted some media reports that multinational companies would be
excluded from bidding.


3. (U) Touted as Kerala's "Port of the Future," Vizhinjam has stayed
that way for a long time. Sixteen kilometers south of Kerala's
state capital Thiruvananthapuram, Vizhinjam now has a small port
where, once in a while, tourist vessels call. Kerala officials say
that with 5-6 meters dredging, Vizhinjam can berth the world's
biggest ships and supertankers with ease. Close proximity to
international sea routes would put the proposed port in the position
to handle a substantial portion of the many containers to and from
India that are presently transshipped through Colombo, Singapore and
Salalah.


4. (SBU) In 2005, Kerala invited global bids for the development of

the port into a mega container transshipment hub capable of handling
post-Panamax class carrier ships. Twenty-two companies showed
interest, but all except two backed out without presenting bids. In
January 2006, the then Congress party-led government of Kerala
accepted the bid by a consortium that included two Chinese companies
-- China Harbor Engineering Company and Kaidi Electric Company --
and Zoom Developers, Mumbai. The central government, however,
refused security clearance for the project. Journalist sources told
Post that the presence of the Chinese companies -- particularly the
China Harbor Engineering Company which is developing the Gwadar Port
in Pakistan --- in the consortium was the reason for the refusal.


5. (SBU) After coming to power in May 2006, the state's new
government, led by the Communist Party of India (Marxist),intensely
lobbied New Delhi for the Chinese project. In August, the Chief
Minister took an all-party delegation to beseech Prime Minister
Singh to give the project the go-ahead. Kerala officials hoped that
Chinese Premier Hu Jintao's 2006 India visit would help resurrect
the project but that did not materialize. Faced with the Center's
unflinching refusal, Kerala backed down and opted for a fresh bid.


6. (SBU) A competing project may hold back the Kerala proposal.
Media contacts said that the central government's Shipping Minister,
T.R. Balu of Tamil Nadu's ruling DMK party, is pushing for a similar
project in Colachel in his home state. Although Kerala officials
remain upbeat about the new bid process, the Tamil Nadu alternative
presents a challenge.


7. (SBU) COMMENT: Kerala officials hope the central government's
security concerns have only temporarily set back the project. The
truth is that Vizhinjam faces a tough battle. Although certain
factors, including the port's natural depth and its location, make
the Kerala project cost-effective, those advantages may be
overshadowed by economic realities. In contrast to Kerala's
reputation for strikes and work stoppages, Tamil Nadu brings to the
table a track record of positive industrial labor relations.
Moreover, Tamil Nadu is seen by multinational corporations as
investor friendly whereas Kerala, with its leftist orientation, is
not.


8. (SBU) COMMENT CONTINUED: Caught between two of its coalition
partners, the DMK Party and the Communist Party of India (M),the
Congress Party must play its cards shrewdly. Since the Samajwadi
Party withdrew support from the UPA government (reftel),Congress
has grown increasingly fragile and vulnerable to the demands of the
Left and its other coalition partners. Congress will try to manage

CHENNAI 00000187 002.4 OF 002


these political realities, as well as the national security concern
that the bureaucracy has raised. END COMMENT.


9. Embassy New Delhi contributed to this message.

HOPPER