Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07BRUSSELS88
2007-01-11 15:06:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Brussels
Cable title:  

BRUSSELS AIRPORT NOISE: COURT DECISION UPHOLDS

Tags:  EAIR EINV BE 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHBS #0088 0111506
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 111506Z JAN 07
FM AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS
TO RUEH/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 4022
INFO RULSDMK/DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHDC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RHMFIUU/FAA NATIONAL HQ WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS BRUSSELS 000088 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

FAA FOR MCAPPELLE, AIA-300
SDOC FOR 3133/USFCS/OIO/EUR
STATE FOR EB/TRA, EUR/ERA, AND EUR/UBI

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAIR EINV BE
SUBJECT: BRUSSELS AIRPORT NOISE: COURT DECISION UPHOLDS
FINES, NEGOTIATIONS STILL THE PREFERRED SOLUTION

REF: A. 05 BRUSSELS 2735


B. 06 BRUSSELS 1035

UNCLAS BRUSSELS 000088

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

FAA FOR MCAPPELLE, AIA-300
SDOC FOR 3133/USFCS/OIO/EUR
STATE FOR EB/TRA, EUR/ERA, AND EUR/UBI

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAIR EINV BE
SUBJECT: BRUSSELS AIRPORT NOISE: COURT DECISION UPHOLDS
FINES, NEGOTIATIONS STILL THE PREFERRED SOLUTION

REF: A. 05 BRUSSELS 2735


B. 06 BRUSSELS 1035


1. (SBU) Summary. A decision by Belgium's Constitutional
Court on December 21 upheld the Brussels Region's noise
standards (and right to fine violators) against a challenge
by the Federal Minister of Transportation. This appears to
reverse an Appeals Court ruling of last March, which declared
the capital region's demanding noise abatement criteria
unconstitutional. The new decision supports an earlier
Appeals Court order of June 2005 that the Federal government
must revise the standing aviation use plan of Zaventem
Airport or face fines of 25,000 euros per infraction.
Despite the dueling rulings, all parties have agreed that no
fines will be imposed while negotiations are underway between
Flanders and Brussels regions and federal authorities. Given
the May federal elections and pace of negotiations, 2008 is
the soonest many expect to see a solution suggested for the
noise dispute. End Summary.


2. (U) On December 21, 2006, Belgium's Constitutional Court
(highest court in Belgium; functions as a Supreme Court)
rejected an appeal by the Federal Minister of Transportation,
joined by the Brussels Airport Authority and Belgocontrol,
that the Appeals Court ruling of June 2005 be overturned.
That 2005 decision (Ref A) ordered the Federal government to
alter the Brussels Airport use plan to comply with Brussels
Region noise standards, even though the airport itself is
located in the Flemish Region. These stringent noise
abatement standards and fines attempt to deter flights over
the city, which lies only 7 kilometers from the airport. The
new Court decision calls for Belgian federal authorities to
comply with the lower Appeals Court order to comply or pay
25,000 euros fine per incident of violation.


3. (SBU) On March 21, 2006, a different Appeals Court had
declared the high regional standards unconstitutional (Ref
B),because the standards compelled Federal authorities to
distribute the noise pollution burden unevenly if Federal
authorities complied, as flights would have to be diverted
over Flanders and Wallonia to avoid Brussels. This would
have breached the principle of equity and "equal protection"
under the law due the inhabitants of all three regions. By
upholding the Constitutional lawfulness of the Brussels
noise standards and fines, the high court has presumably
reversed the Appeals Court decision.


4. (SBU) Federal Transportation Minister Renaat Landuyt
acknowledged the new decision verified regional authority to
set noise standards, but declared that the ruling changed
nothing. Flanders-Brussels interregional negotiations on the
issue, mediated by the Federal government, have been underway
since 2005, during which the parties agreed not to attempt to
collect fines. (Note: Since the deadline for Federal
compliance with the Court Order passed in September 2005,
reportedly over 820 violations of Brussels noise standards by
air carriers have been recorded; imposed fines would have
exceeded 20 million euros.)


5. (SBU) Comment: The new Court decision does not resolve
the jurisdictional dispute. All sides endorse the
negotiating process underway to reach an agreed mechanism to
best distribute the noise burden of the urban airport.
Interrelated jurisdictional competencies -- Federal
government for aviation safety, Regional governments for
environmental (read noise) issues, Belgocontrol for aviation
navigation -- remain the heart of the issue, complicated by
linguistic group frictions. The coming Federal elections in
May/June 2007, to be followed by high-level negotiations
about further devolution of responsibilities from the federal
to regional level, will certainly complicate the situation.
Consensus among analysts is that there will be little
progress on resolving the airport noise issue at least until

2008. In the meanwhile the carriers will not be fined.

IMBRIE
.