Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07BRUSSELS1652
2007-05-18 12:24:00
CONFIDENTIAL
USEU Brussels
Cable title:
DEPUTY SECRETARY DISCUSSES LATIN AMERICA, TURKEY,
how-toVZCZCXRO9581 PP RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR DE RUEHBS #1652 1381224 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 181224Z MAY 07 FM USEU BRUSSELS TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L BRUSSELS 001652
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/18/2017
TAGS: PREL PHUM EUN EAID XM IR TU
SUBJECT: DEPUTY SECRETARY DISCUSSES LATIN AMERICA, TURKEY,
AND IRAN WITH EU
Classified By: Political Minister Counselor Laurence Wohlers for reason
s 1.4 b,d.
C O N F I D E N T I A L BRUSSELS 001652
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/18/2017
TAGS: PREL PHUM EUN EAID XM IR TU
SUBJECT: DEPUTY SECRETARY DISCUSSES LATIN AMERICA, TURKEY,
AND IRAN WITH EU
Classified By: Political Minister Counselor Laurence Wohlers for reason
s 1.4 b,d.
1. (C) Deputy Secretary Negroponte discussed a wide ranging
set of issues May 16 with EU officials over dinner hosted by
Ambassador Gray. In attendance on the EU side were Robert
Cooper (deputy of Javier Solana),Christian Leffler (head of
cabinet to Commissioner Wallstrom),Simon Fraser (head of
cabinet to Commissioner Mandelson, and Nicolas Pascual de la
Parte, Latin American adviser to Solana). EB A/S Sullivan
and emboff also attended. Latin America, Turkey and Iran
were among the principal topics discussed.
2. (C) Latin America: The Deputy Secretary opened the
discussion by noting that he had been impressed during his
recent Latin American tour by the tremendous changes and
economic dynamism in the region in general and in Colombia in
particular. He noted that the planned Colombian free trade
agreement would have real strategic value in solidifying
stability there and asked if the EU shared this appraisal.
EU officials responded that Colombia was the largest
recipient of EU aid in Latin America (70 million euros) and
that the EU was strongly committed to Colombia. Colombia was
seen as a success story in Europe, and President Uribe was
widely admired in European capitals for his stewardship.
European officials agreed that Latin America generally needed
trade more than aid and had therefore been focusing efforts
on offering preferential tariffs on the one hand and on
pursuing trade initiatives that would encourage regional
economic integration on the other.
3. (C) Turkey: European participants agreed that Turkish
accession was a difficult political problem for the EU, and
that Sarkozy's election would further complicate matters.
For Europeans, there were several over-lapping factors.
First, the public was tired of enlargement in general after
recent additions. Second, Europe was not used to being an
importer of people (historically, it had always sent people
outwards),and this was a real cultural paradigm shift to
which the continent needed to adjust. Indeed, even in the
relatively open UK, the very large influx of Polish
immigrants in a short period was causing a backlash.
Nevertheless, they agreed that the goal with Turkey is to
simply not allow the door to be slammed shut in the short
term. Economically, the accession process had been good for
Turkey, leading to important economic reform. Politically,
any date for accession itself was still at least a decade
away, so it was important that the French follow the German
position: allowing the process to go forward while reserving
judgment on the final outcome.
4. (C) Iran: Europeans agreed that European export credits
to Iran have fallen dramatically recently, the result of both
of a quiet US effort to ensure sanctions had teeth and a
growing sense in Europe of the heightened risk in business
with Iran. Although the sanctions are clearly biting, the
reality is that Iran's own economic policies are much more
destructive to the economy. The regime clearly is not
interested in economic policy and is, in fact, increasingly
replacing technocrats in key government positions with
Republican Guard loyalists. In the short term, high oil
revenues are helping the regime buy-off the public with more
services. Moreover, the sense from European diplomats in
Tehran was that there is no internal Iranian debate on the
value of the nuclear program. In the long term, however, the
Europeans agreed that the regime is headed for trouble, as
its economic policies are steadily grinding down the
non-oil-based business core of the economy. Finally, the
Europeans expressed concern that the US might renew a push
for applying sanctions on European firms under ILSA
legislation: it is important that the US and the EU stay
united as we continue to turn up the pressure on Iran,
applying sanctions against each other would complicate our
efforts.
5. (U) D Staff has cleared this message.
GRAY
.
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/18/2017
TAGS: PREL PHUM EUN EAID XM IR TU
SUBJECT: DEPUTY SECRETARY DISCUSSES LATIN AMERICA, TURKEY,
AND IRAN WITH EU
Classified By: Political Minister Counselor Laurence Wohlers for reason
s 1.4 b,d.
1. (C) Deputy Secretary Negroponte discussed a wide ranging
set of issues May 16 with EU officials over dinner hosted by
Ambassador Gray. In attendance on the EU side were Robert
Cooper (deputy of Javier Solana),Christian Leffler (head of
cabinet to Commissioner Wallstrom),Simon Fraser (head of
cabinet to Commissioner Mandelson, and Nicolas Pascual de la
Parte, Latin American adviser to Solana). EB A/S Sullivan
and emboff also attended. Latin America, Turkey and Iran
were among the principal topics discussed.
2. (C) Latin America: The Deputy Secretary opened the
discussion by noting that he had been impressed during his
recent Latin American tour by the tremendous changes and
economic dynamism in the region in general and in Colombia in
particular. He noted that the planned Colombian free trade
agreement would have real strategic value in solidifying
stability there and asked if the EU shared this appraisal.
EU officials responded that Colombia was the largest
recipient of EU aid in Latin America (70 million euros) and
that the EU was strongly committed to Colombia. Colombia was
seen as a success story in Europe, and President Uribe was
widely admired in European capitals for his stewardship.
European officials agreed that Latin America generally needed
trade more than aid and had therefore been focusing efforts
on offering preferential tariffs on the one hand and on
pursuing trade initiatives that would encourage regional
economic integration on the other.
3. (C) Turkey: European participants agreed that Turkish
accession was a difficult political problem for the EU, and
that Sarkozy's election would further complicate matters.
For Europeans, there were several over-lapping factors.
First, the public was tired of enlargement in general after
recent additions. Second, Europe was not used to being an
importer of people (historically, it had always sent people
outwards),and this was a real cultural paradigm shift to
which the continent needed to adjust. Indeed, even in the
relatively open UK, the very large influx of Polish
immigrants in a short period was causing a backlash.
Nevertheless, they agreed that the goal with Turkey is to
simply not allow the door to be slammed shut in the short
term. Economically, the accession process had been good for
Turkey, leading to important economic reform. Politically,
any date for accession itself was still at least a decade
away, so it was important that the French follow the German
position: allowing the process to go forward while reserving
judgment on the final outcome.
4. (C) Iran: Europeans agreed that European export credits
to Iran have fallen dramatically recently, the result of both
of a quiet US effort to ensure sanctions had teeth and a
growing sense in Europe of the heightened risk in business
with Iran. Although the sanctions are clearly biting, the
reality is that Iran's own economic policies are much more
destructive to the economy. The regime clearly is not
interested in economic policy and is, in fact, increasingly
replacing technocrats in key government positions with
Republican Guard loyalists. In the short term, high oil
revenues are helping the regime buy-off the public with more
services. Moreover, the sense from European diplomats in
Tehran was that there is no internal Iranian debate on the
value of the nuclear program. In the long term, however, the
Europeans agreed that the regime is headed for trouble, as
its economic policies are steadily grinding down the
non-oil-based business core of the economy. Finally, the
Europeans expressed concern that the US might renew a push
for applying sanctions on European firms under ILSA
legislation: it is important that the US and the EU stay
united as we continue to turn up the pressure on Iran,
applying sanctions against each other would complicate our
efforts.
5. (U) D Staff has cleared this message.
GRAY
.