Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07BRASILIA617
2007-04-09 21:00:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Brasilia
Cable title:  

FOREIGN ASSISTANCE TO MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRIES

Tags:  EAID PREL BR 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO8990
PP RUEHRG
DE RUEHBR #0617/01 0992100
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 092100Z APR 07
FM AMEMBASSY BRASILIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8610
RUEHSO/AMCONSUL SAO PAULO 9592
RUEHRI/AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO 4175
RUEHRG/AMCONSUL RECIFE 6493
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO 2049
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 0275
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BRASILIA 000617 

SIPDIS

AIDAC
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
FROM COUNTRY TEAM BRASILIA

F FOR RTOBIAS
WHA FOR A/S SHANON; PDAS SHAPIRO
USAID LAC FOR AFRANCO
MCC FOR DANILOVICH

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAID PREL BR
SUBJECT: FOREIGN ASSISTANCE TO MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRIES


UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BRASILIA 000617

SIPDIS

AIDAC
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
FROM COUNTRY TEAM BRASILIA

F FOR RTOBIAS
WHA FOR A/S SHANON; PDAS SHAPIRO
USAID LAC FOR AFRANCO
MCC FOR DANILOVICH

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAID PREL BR
SUBJECT: FOREIGN ASSISTANCE TO MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRIES



1. (SBU) Summary. Internationally, in recent years there has been
an emphasis on directing foreign assistance to lower-income
developing countries where the levels of poverty are generally more
acute. However, this approach may result in insufficient support to
the development and poverty eradication efforts of Middle Income
Countries (MICs). Under current USG foreign assistance plans,
Development Assistance funding would be eliminated in MICs such as
Brazil, India and Mexico; USAID missions in those countries would
drastically decrease in scale and scope or even close down. This
strategy may prove to have serious shortcomings in terms of
engagement with large MICs, the overall impact on development, and
achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). End
Summary.


2. (U) Definition and classification of Middle Income Countries is
not standardized, and there is no universally agreed definition.
However, using most income-related criteria, including that of the
DAC (between $826 and $10,065 GNI per capita) certain USAID-assisted
countries such as Brazil, India and Mexico are generally classified
as MICs. In addition, these countries share the characteristics of
large, populous countries with growing global power.


3. (SBU) There are many reasons why the USG and the international
community should maintain its support, appropriately defined to this
important groups of countries, inter alia:

-- to contribute to the eradication of poverty.
-- to forestall losing ground with respect to the social and
economic progress that has already been achieved.
-- to help MICs serve as regional development poles
-- to support MICs contribution in the provision of international
public goods such as peacebuilding, prevention of communicable
diseases, financial stability and environmental sustainability.

Poverty Eradication
--------------

4. (U) According to estimates by DFID, by 2015, around two-thirds
of those living on less than $2/day will be living in MICs
(particularly in the larger ones) as will one-half of those living
on less than $1/day. Current development priorities that focus on
low income countries do not sufficiently address this reality and

the changing picture of poverty. In addition, beneath aggregate
growth in China, India, Brazil and other countries, there is
evidence that spatial inequality may be rising. Certain regions of
these countries, like the Northeast of Brazil, would be classified
as low-income if considered as an independent state. Moreover,
income inequality in MICs is widely perceived to be high, as
measured by Gini coefficients, and to contribute to political unrest
and social instability that in turn affect people's livelihoods and
their capacity to contribute to sustained economic growth. Recent
evidence indicates that MDGs may well fall short in MICs, and thus
throughout key regions like Latin America. In Brazil, for example,
a recent study traced progress on seven MDGs in the Amazon region
and showed unsatisfactory progress. Key indicators such as
deforestation, HIV/AIDS, and maternal deaths all increased, instead
of declining as projected.

Preserving Hard-won Gains
--------------

5. (U) "Graduation" or progression to MIC status is not always
maintained. Movements from one category to another can take place
in either direction. DFID estimates that over the last 20 years, 38
countries have fallen back from MIC to LIC status, with only 10
managing to return to MIC status in subsequent years. Changes at
the national and international level may not be connected to
improvements in people's well being. These improvements are neither
inevitable nor systematic, and sustaining such achievements is
clearly not inevitable.

Poles of Development
--------------

6. (U) Particularly in the case of Brazil, India and Mexico, the
economic size of these MICs and their dynamism makes them an
important driving force for their regions. The international
community can take advantage of this to help maximize the positive
effects of its aid programs in each recipient region. Clearly,
developments in MICs are important for poverty reduction elsewhere
and in terms of trade opportunities for low income countries.

International Public Goods
--------------

BRASILIA 00000617 002 OF 002



7. (U) The large MICs such as Brazil, India and Mexico have an
increased impact on global issues. For example, in areas such as
health and infectious disease, energy security, climate change and
conservation of globally important biological diversity, it is not
possible for the international community to seriously engage on
these issues without addressing the MICs.

Comment
--------------

8. (U) USAID should consider the need for a more considered approach
to MICs overall, and in particular to the large MICs with growing
global power. Other bilateral donors, such as the U.K., Germany, and
Japan are scaling up their engagement with MICs, especially those
considered to be regional development poles and key points of
influence in the regions. USAID should devise a coherent strategy
for this group of countries, and devise appropriate, non-traditional
methodologies for engaging with MICs, particularly emerging powers
who have a critical role in successfully managing global public
goods. A strategy should accompany a deeper understanding of the
interests of individual MICs, among them a desire to strengthen
their role as emerging powers, secure access to technology and
expertise, and garner support for mutually beneficial partnerships.
Cutting off development assistance to save a relatively small amount
of money may be counterproductive should this close off important
channels of bilateral communication or starves models designed to
address critical poverty and development issues on a national scale.
In particular, the USG may lose influence over decision making in
critical areas (environmental protection and control of illegal
logging in Brazil, for example) which would eliminate precisely the
transformational diplomacy results that are our objective.

CHICOLA