Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07BERLIN80
2007-01-12 16:02:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Berlin
Cable title:  

TSA OFFICIALS DISCUSS AVIATION SECURITY WITH

Tags:  EAIR KJUS PREL PTER GM 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO7072
PP RUEHAG RUEHDF RUEHIK RUEHLZ RUEHROV
DE RUEHRL #0080/01 0121602
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 121602Z JAN 07
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEAHLC/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6673
RUEFHLC/HOMELAND SECURITY CENTER WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
RUCNFRG/FRG COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BERLIN 000080 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAIR KJUS PREL PTER GM
SUBJECT: TSA OFFICIALS DISCUSS AVIATION SECURITY WITH
GERMAN INTERIOR AND TRANSPORTATION MINISTRIES

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BERLIN 000080

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAIR KJUS PREL PTER GM
SUBJECT: TSA OFFICIALS DISCUSS AVIATION SECURITY WITH
GERMAN INTERIOR AND TRANSPORTATION MINISTRIES


1. (SBU) Summary. In meetings with German Interior and
Transportation officials December 19, TSA representatives
pushed for more access by USG inspectors to Germany's
airports and to air carriers that fly to the U.S. The TSA
reps also voiced concerns about Germany's failure to
re-screen carry-on baggage of passengers transiting Germany
en route to the U.S. whose carry-on items have been screened
at an airport of another EU Member State. The German side
cited resource and manpower constraints as the factors that
have limited access USG inspectors' access, and suggested
that the U.S. agree to participate in joint inspections with
EU personnel. On the issue of re-screening carry-on baggage,
the German officials asked that the USG place greater trust
in the EU's concept of "one-stop security," i.e., that
screening in any EU airport obviates the need for
re-screening. TSA reps cited U.S. regulations that required
re-screening and indicated we would have very limited
flexibility on this issue. End Summary.


2. (SBU) Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
Director for Stakeholder Liaison Victoria Reeder met with
officials from the German Interior and Transportation
Ministry December 19 to review airport and airline security
issues, with a particular emphasis on mandatory assessments
of German airports and inspections by USG personnel of
airlines that fly from Germany to the U.S. The German
delegation was led by Dietmar Marscholleck, Interior Ministry
Director for Aviation Security, and Joerg Mendel,
Transportation Ministry Director for Aviation Security.
Reeder was accompanied by TSA Country Representative and
Global Affairs Counselor.


3. (SBU) Reeder first raised the issue of air carrier
inspections, noting USG personnel have at times encountered
difficulties in scheduling mandatory inspections of non-U.S.
flag carriers that operate out of German airports. Reeder
pointed out that air carrier inspections were distinct from
airport assessments and were mandated by U.S., rather than
international, legal requirements.


4. (SBU) Marscholleck replied by recalling that the EU as a

whole has been discussing the issues of airport assessments
and air carrier inspections with the U.S. Bilateral
discussions on these issues must complement the ongoing
U.S.-EU dialogue, he said. On the issue of USG inspections
of non-U.S. flag carriers, Marschollek argued that to allow
the U.S. to conduct inspections as requested would stretch
German resources too thinly and would also open the door to
requests from other governments to inspect all air carriers
that fly to their respective countries. Noting that the EU
regularly conducted its own inspections, he suggested that
the U.S. consider participating in joint inspections with EU
personnel. He also proposed increased data-sharing between
Germany and the U.S. with respect to the results of
inspections carried out by Germany.


5. (SBU) Reeder welcomed the possibilities for enhanced
information exchange, but voiced concerns about the
appropriateness of joint U.S.-EU inspection teams. She
reminded the German side that USG security enforcement
criteria are often more stringent than the standards applied
by the EU. She also stressed that TSA was obligated by U.S.
law to carry out inspections in accordance with U.S.
requirements and procedures. The TSA has very little
flexibility in this regard.


6. (SBU) Marscholleck next raised the issue of re-screening
carry-on luggage that transits airports only within the EU.
He argued that the U.S should accept the EU policy of
"one-stop security" that considers a one-time screening of
carry-on luggage at any EU airport sufficient, provided that
passengers transit only through approved airport security
zones prior to their onward travel to the U.S. Mendel
posited that the USG might not be sufficiently familiar with
EU screening procedures, and suggested more TSA access to EU
screening teams -- or even the integration of TSA screeners
into EU teams -- as measures that would help allay U.S.
security concerns. Reeder replied that while the USG might
be satisfied with screening procedures at most airports in
Germany, we did not consider those procedures sufficient at
all EU airports. She stressed that TSA also has limited
flexibility in this case, since the requirements to re-screen
carry-on baggage are statutory.


7. (SBU) In response to a question from TSA Country Rep as
to whether Germany would consider allowing air carriers to
contract a commercial security firm to conduct the
re-screening required by USG regulations, Marschollek said

BERLIN 00000080 002 OF 002


Germany would continue to rely exclusively on official
government personnel. He reiterated his request that the USG
place greater trust in German security practices and
procedures. Reeder undertook to consider the German
proposals, but reiterated that the statutory nature of TSA
security-related procedures and requirements placed
considerable constraints on TSA flexibility.
TIMKEN JR