Identifier | Created | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|
07BELGRADE1472 | 2007-10-30 12:56:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Belgrade |
VZCZCXRO2800 RR RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDBU RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG DE RUEHBW #1472/01 3031256 ZNR UUUUU ZZH R 301256Z OCT 07 FM AMEMBASSY BELGRADE TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 1682 INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE |
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BELGRADE 001472 |
1. (U) The Democratic Party of Serbia of Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica on October 28 adopted a declaration supporting military neutrality for Serbia. The declaration, while dramatic, in fact, allows for the possibility of Serbia entering a military alliance by public referendum. For the moment, coalition partners, who see Serbia's future built on European integration and Euro-Atlantic alliances, are treading softly around the issue. With Kosovo status and presidential elections looming large, their agenda is already full of neuralgia triggers, without adding a debate on NATO. Unless or until DSS tries to move this from a party platform to a government policy, the President and his party will likely defer this debate, while moving cautiously forward with PfP planning. An unofficial translation of the declaration is provided in para 7. End summary. DSS Affirms Military Neutrality in Party Platform -------------------------- -------------------------- 2. (U) The Democratic Party of Serbia's (DSS) main board unanimously adopted military neutrality for Serbia as a plank in its party platform, October 28. "Military neutrality in relation to the existing military alliances represents the best and most reliable way for Serbia to preserve its state sovereignty, integrity, and independence," the declaration states. The declaration stipulates that Serbia may enter into a military alliance only by decision of a public referendum. The text does not explicitly bar Serbia's cooperation with other countries on common security issues. 3. (SBU) The declaration restates as party policy the position against NATO membership that Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica outlined during the October 14 DSS party conference (reftel) and that DSS members have publicly echoed in recent weeks. Dragan Sormaz, DSS member of the Parliament's Defense and Security Committee, told visiting NATO state parliamentarians on October 25 that Serbia should not join any military alliance. "Why criticize us for wanting to be neutral," Sormaz said to the parliamentarians and diplomats. Sormaz pointed to Austria as a potential model for neutrality, citing Austrian cooperation with NATO in the PFP program. Austria also is an example of a non-NATO member of the EU. Defining Neutrality -------------------------- 4. (U) Local media is trying to figure out the practical implications of the DSS brand of neutrality. Gordana Logar, columnist of the independent daily "Danas," wrote in her October 29 column that one might view the DSS declaration in the context of the DSS relationships with coalition partners and with Russia. Logar speculated that the DSS declaration was meant to ease Moscow's concerns about Serbia's intention to sign a Stabilization and Association Agreement with the European Union. Logar questioned whether the DSS brand of neutrality would preclude or limit military cooperation or membership in associations. Logar also questioned whether neutrality would limit the government from active involvement in the affairs of Republika Srpska. She also mentioned that Serbia's only current military engagement was with the United States -- with the Ohio National Guard. 5. (SBU) While analysts and politicians are still trying to determine the impact of the DSS declaration, Democratic Party (DS) members are somewhat dismissive. DS MP and member of the Parliament's Defense and Security Committee Konstantin Samofalov told poloff on October 29 that the announcement "gained cheap political points." Samofalov noted, however, that the political isolation that neutrality suggests would be a setback for the country. Serbia could not "stay in a black hole" when all its neighbors wanted to be NATO members. Samofalov said he presumed that the DSS concept of neutrality posed obstacles only to NATO membership, "but with the DSS one never knows," he said. 6. (SBU) Belgrade-based think tanks also were trying to read between the lines of the declaration; the text of the document left some unimpressed. President of the International and Security Affairs Center, Pavle Jankovic, told poloff on October 29 that the DSS position "neglects an understanding of what neutrality means these days." The DSS does not appreciate the challenge of neutrality, which requires a country to provide for one's citizens what otherwise could be provided for more easily through international obligations, Jankovic said. Jankovic surmised that the DSS position was primarily drafted for domestic political impact, but speculated that it also played well for Russia, setting Serbia to aggravate U.S. and EU plans for Europe whole, free, and at peace. Moving forward Slowly with PFP -------------------------- BELGRADE 00001472 002 OF 002 5. (SBU) Government officials suggest that the DSS neutrality will slow Serbia's participation in NATO's Partnership for Peace (PfP). Director for MFA's NATO Office, Milan Gojkovic, told poloff on October 25 that, as a result of DSS's position, the MFA and MOD were carefully selecting PfP events and would devise a "non-controversial" Individual Partnership Plan (IPP) for Serbia's PfP participation that will assure coalition approval. The GOS would present its IPP to NATO on December 4, Gojkovic said. Comment -------------------------- 6. (SBU) Neutrality sits comfortably with those nostalgic for Yugoslavia's non-aligned past, but it does not bode well for the country's future. That Kostunica and his party advance an anti-NATO agenda is neither surprising nor new. To couch this agenda in terms of neutrality is new. And while neutrality might secure political and hydrocarbon support for Serbia from distant Russia, it would leave the country alone in the Balkans as a non-participant in the international security sector. End Comment. Translation of DSS Declaration on Military Neutrality -------------------------- -------------------------- 7. (U) Begin Translation 1. Military neutrality in relation to existing military alliances represents the best and most reliable way for Serbia to preserve its state sovereignty, integrity and independence as the basis for free and total progress and to provide a dignified life for its citizens. 2. Military neutrality is the most secure guarantee for peace, while a policy of military neutrality is the best way for the development and improvement of Serbia in accordance to its own interests. 3. Military neutrality represents the expression of Serbia's sincere choice against policies of force, threats to world peace, aggression and war. 4. Choosing a policy of peace, development and preservation of internal and international security is proof that military neutrality is not, nor can it be, directed against other countries, and best testifies to Serbia's readiness to equally cooperate with all the countries in the world that respect the universal principles of international law embodied in the UN Charter. 5. Military neutrality does not exclude the possibility of Serbia's cooperation with other countries in the interest of common and general security and allows Serbia to develop its own security system in accordance with its national and state interests, aimed at the democratic, peaceful and stable development of Serbia. 6. Giving up the principle of military neutrality and joining the NATO Pact would require Serbia to take part in wars that are not in its interest, limiting its freedom and freedom of political decision, threatening the lives of its citizens and overburdening the internal reform and progress of the country. 7. No one is entitled, nor has the right, to pass the decision for Serbia to join any military alliance without the approval of the citizens, who can pass such a decision exclusively by referendum. End Translation. BRUSH |