Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07BEIJING921
2007-02-08 05:52:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Beijing
Cable title:  

HUMAN RIGHTS: POST RAISES EXECUTION CASE OF UIGHUR

Tags:  PHUM PREL PGOV CH 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1419
OO RUEHCN RUEHGH RUEHVC
DE RUEHBJ #0921 0390552
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 080552Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY BEIJING
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 4579
INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L BEIJING 000921 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

STATE FOR DRL, EAP/CM

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/08/2032
TAGS: PHUM PREL PGOV CH
SUBJECT: HUMAN RIGHTS: POST RAISES EXECUTION CASE OF UIGHUR
ISMAIL SEMED

Classified By: Political Section Internal Unit Chief Susan A. Thornton.
Reasons 1.4 (b/d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L BEIJING 000921

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

STATE FOR DRL, EAP/CM

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/08/2032
TAGS: PHUM PREL PGOV CH
SUBJECT: HUMAN RIGHTS: POST RAISES EXECUTION CASE OF UIGHUR
ISMAIL SEMED

Classified By: Political Section Internal Unit Chief Susan A. Thornton.
Reasons 1.4 (b/d).


1. (C) Post contacted Ministry of Foreign Affairs
International Organizations Department Human Rights
officer Xu Jing February 8 to urge that China stay the
execution of Uighur rights activist Ismail Semed,
citing problems of due process and the requirement
under Chinese law for a Supreme Court review of the
case. Poloff noted reports about possible coerced
testimony and lack of transparency and access to a
defense lawyer in the Semed case. He urged that the
Supreme People's Court review the case as mandated by
Chinese law effective January 1, 2007, and highlighted
concerns over reports that there has been no SPC
review of the case. Poloff asked that Chinese legal
authorities stay the execution so that a review can
take place and urged the Government to conduct the
proceedings transparently, in accordance with
international law and practice.


2. (C) Xu promised to look into the matter and to
share our request with senior MFA officials. Later on
February 8, after speaking with SPC representatives,
Xu contacted Post and reported that the SPC is not
required to review death sentences that were handed
down prior to January 1, 2007 (Semed's was delivered
in October, 2005). (Note: According to the amended
law, death penalty cases that did not require Supreme
Court review prior to January 1 and were reviewed by
the relevant higher court prior to that date do not
require SPC review. Reports available to the Embassy
do not make clear when the Xinjiang High Court
reviewed the case. End note.) Poloff urged that in
this sensitive case China should nonetheless observe
the spirit of the new regulation and the SPC should
review Semed's sentence. Xu said she would pass our
concerns to the relevant authorities.
RANDT