Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07ASTANA223
2007-01-26 01:30:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Astana
Cable title:  

JURY TRIAL SYSTEM DEBUTS IN KAZAKHSTAN

Tags:  PGOV PHUM KZ 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO8973
RR RUEHDBU RUEHLN RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHTA #0223/01 0260130
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 260130Z JAN 07
FM AMEMBASSY ASTANA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8279
INFO RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE 0009
RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE 1675
RUEHAST/USOFFICE ALMATY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 ASTANA 000223 

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR SCA/CEN (M. O'MARA, T. PERRY),DRL/PHD (C.
KUCHTA-HELBLING)

SENSITIVE

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KZ
SUBJECT: JURY TRIAL SYSTEM DEBUTS IN KAZAKHSTAN


ASTANA 00000223 001.2 OF 003


UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 ASTANA 000223

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR SCA/CEN (M. O'MARA, T. PERRY),DRL/PHD (C.
KUCHTA-HELBLING)

SENSITIVE

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KZ
SUBJECT: JURY TRIAL SYSTEM DEBUTS IN KAZAKHSTAN


ASTANA 00000223 001.2 OF 003



1. (SBU) Summary: As of January 1, criminal defendants in Kazakhstan
charged with aggravated murder have the right to request a jury
trial. Under the system developed by Kazakhstani authorities, two
judges, including the judge presiding at trial, participate on the
jury along with nine lay jurors. The long awaited implementation of
jury trials represents an important step toward promoting judicial
transparency in Kazakhstan. However, the untested system faces
several challenges, including lack of training for judges, lack of
public awareness, and the potential for judges to dominate and
control the deliberations. End summary.

--------------
WHO HAS A RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY?
--------------


2. (U) As of January 1, criminal defendants charged with aggravated
murder have the right to request a trial by jury. The jury trial
right applies only to those defendants charged under Article 291.2
of the Criminal Code, which defines aggravated murder and carries a
possible death penalty. (Note: Kazakhstan imposed a moratorium on
the death penalty in 2003. Defendants sentenced to death are in
effect sentenced to life in prison, though they could be executed if
the moratorium is lifted. End note.) Aggravated murder includes
especially brutal murders, multiple murders, murders of persons
carrying out official duties, murders connected with a sexual crime,
hostage murders, etc.


3. (U) In order to obtain a trial by jury, the defendant in such a
case must file a request when the termination of the preliminary
investigation has been announced and all case files have been
submitted for inspection. The motion for a jury trial will be
considered during a closed, preliminary hearing, and the procurator,
defendant, and defense counsel are required to be present. The law
appears to create a presumption that the request for a jury trial
will be granted if the defendant affirms the request during the
hearing. The defendant may also choose not to request a jury trial.
However, once the defendant's decision is affirmed by the judge
during the preliminary hearing, the decision is final.

--------------
HOW ARE THE JURORS SELECTED?
--------------



4. (U) Juries will consist of nine lay jurors plus the two judges
(presiding and second) hearing the case. There will also be two
reserve jurors who will be dismissed at the close of proceedings if
not needed. The court will create the preliminary pool of jury
candidates for each case by randomly selecting persons from jury
lists composed within each oblast (region) by oblast officials. The
secretary of the court notifies the candidate of their selection at

SIPDIS
least seven days prior to the trial. A person may serve on a jury
only once per year.


5. (U) The preliminary pool of jury candidates will then undergo a
screening process somewhat similar to the voir dire process used in
United States. First, the judge will address all of the candidates
and introduce them to the court, the parties, and the case, and
outline the tasks of the jury. Candidates who are suspected or
charged with a crime, unable to understand the language of the court
in the absence of simultaneous translation, or who are otherwise
physically unable to fully participate in the proceedings will be
dismissed from service automatically. In addition, candidates may
request relief from jury service if they have a "reasonable excuse,"
including that they are over 65 years old, have religious beliefs
that prohibit them from participating in the administration of
justice, are women with children under three years of age, or are
professionals whose diversion will damage state or public interests.



6. (U) Next, the judge will question the remaining candidates about
their knowledge of the case and their ability to serve as impartial
jurors. The presiding judge asks the questions, but the procurator,
victim, defendant, and defense counsel may submit written questions
to the judge. The law requires the judge to dismiss biased
candidates or candidates who have outside knowledge of the facts of
the case. The parties may challenge for cause any juror candidate
who is a victim, civil plaintiff or defendant, or potential witness
in the case; any candidate serving as an expert, interpreter, or in
another role in connection with the case; any candidate related to
the parties, victim, lawyers, or investigator; or any candidate with
a personal, direct or indirect interest in the case.


7. (U) If over 16 candidates remain at the conclusion of this stage,
the judge will reduce the pool to 16 by randomly removing juror
candidates through a blind draw. The procurator may then eliminate
two candidates without cause, and the defendant three. Finally, the

ASTANA 00000223 002.2 OF 003


judge calls the remaining 11 candidates to the jury box in random
order. The last two jurors called constitute the reserve jurors.
The judge administers an oath to the jurors and explains their
rights and duties.

-------------- -
WHAT IS THE ROLE OF THE JURY DURING THE TRIAL?
-------------- -


8. (U) During the evidentiary stage of the trial, the jury listens
to the parties examine witnesses. Once the parties have concluded
their examination of a particular witness, the jurors, via the
presiding judge, may ask questions of the witness, the defendant,
and/or the victim. The jurors may also review the physical evidence
and documents submitted in the case. Following the evidentiary
stage of the trial, the jury listens to the arguments of the
parties. If parties refer to excluded or previously unexamined
evidence, the judge will interrupt the party and instruct the jury
not to consider that evidence.


9. (U) Following the arguments and rebuttal, the judge will explain
the allegations and the appropriate law, summarize the evidence and
positions of the parties, explain that a defendant's failure to
testify shall not be considered a sign of guilt, and explain the
method of deliberation and voting. The parties may object to the
judge's instructions, and such objections may be grounds for an
appeal.

--------------
HOW DOES THE JURY DETERMINE A VERDICT?
--------------


10. (U) After the presiding judge instructs the jury, the jury
withdraws from the courtroom and the two judges formulate specific
questions to the jury concerning the criminal charges. The parties
have the right to offer input to the formulation of the questions,
but the presiding judge completes the final formulation of the
questions in the secrecy of the deliberation room. Each criminal
count will have the following three questions: 1) is it proven that
the act took place; 2) is it proven that the act was committed by
defendant; and 3) is defendant guilty of a crime. These questions
may be followed by additional questions that may diminish or
aggravate guilt, or call for the discharge of the defendant.


11. (U) The judges and jury then meet in the deliberation room, and
the presiding judge chairs the meeting and serves as the foreperson
of the jury. The deliberations are secret. The jurors may request
explanations from the presiding judge on unclear issues, and such
requests are not shared with the parties. After deliberating, the
judges and jurors vote on the questions by secret paper ballot; the
votes of the judges and jurors have equal weight. The presiding
judge must count the votes in the presence of the jurors.


12. (U) The defendant is found guilty of a particular charge if
there are a majority of affirmative votes for each of the first
three questions. The defendant is found not guilty if there are a
majority of negative votes (six or more) for any one of these three
questions. If the defendant is found guilty, the jury also decides
the sentence by open vote. Eight votes are required to impose a
sentence of greater than 15 years, and a unanimous vote is required
for the death penalty.

-------------- --------------
WHAT ARE THE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS WITH THIS SYSTEM?
-------------- --------------


13. (SBU) Although no jury trials have been conducted to date, there
are a number of potential problems with this new system. Because
the judges participate in the deliberations and vote along with the
jurors, they are likely to dominate the deliberations. In addition,
judges have received very little training concerning the new system,
and there is virtually no awareness among the general public (the
potential jury pool) of their rights and responsibilities as jurors.



14. (SBU) The American Bar Association/Central European and Eurasian
Law Initiative (ABA/CEELI),in the interest of promoting effective
implementation of the new law, conducted three mock jury trials in
October of 2006. After analyzing the mock trials, ABA/CEELI issued
several recommendations to improve the system. The recommendations
centered on clarifying a number of procedural issues, as well as
enhancing the impartiality of the jurors. Among other things,
ABA/CEELI recommended that jurors be allowed to remain in the
courtroom for all portions of the arguments by the parties, so their
knowledge of the case is equal to that of the judge, and that any
explanations of unclear issues given by the judge to the jurors be

ASTANA 00000223 003.2 OF 003


shared in advance with the procurator and defense counsel to prevent
unfair prejudice to their cases. To date, Kazakhstan has not
revised its jury trial legislation to address these concerns.


15. (SBU) USAID, at the request of the Supreme Court of Kazakhstan,
has been working closely with the judiciary to prepare it for the
implementation of jury trials. USAID has several concerns about the
judiciary's lack of preparation, but is optimistic that the system
will eventually improve through experience and the development of
new procedures. (Details to be reported septel.)

--------------
COMMENT
--------------


16. (SBU) Comment: The initiation of jury trials in Kazakhstan is a
welcome step toward transforming a frequently corrupt and easily
influenced judicial system. However, the system is untested, and
this fledgling effort toward greater independence and integrity
could easily be overcome by lack of training and a structure that
allows the judges to play a significant role in decision-making.
Post and its partners at USAID will continue to monitor
implementation of the jury trial system and to advocate for
additional practices and procedures to ensure the integrity of the
system. End comment.

MILAS