Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07ANKARA2522
2007-10-11 13:46:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Ankara
Cable title:  

TURKISH MFA REACTION TO ARMENIAN GENOCIDE VOTE

Tags:  PREL US TU 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO6926
OO RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHAK #2522/01 2841346
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 111346Z OCT 07
FM AMEMBASSY ANKARA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 3992
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEHGB/AMEMBASSY BAGHDAD 1039
RHMFISS/EUCOM POLAD VAIHINGEN GE
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
RUEHAK/USDAO ANKARA TU
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC//USDP:PDUSDP/ISA:EUR/ISA::NESA//
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC
RUEUITH/ODC ANKARA TU
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J-3/J-5//
RUFOADA/JAC MOLESWORTH RAF MOLESWORTH UK
RHMFISS/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL
RHMFISS/425ABS IZMIR TU//CC//
RHMFISS/39ABG INCIRLIK AB TU
RUEPGAB/MNF-I C2X BAGHDAD IZ
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 002522 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/10/2017
TAGS: PREL US TU
SUBJECT: TURKISH MFA REACTION TO ARMENIAN GENOCIDE VOTE

REF: ANKARA 2517

Classified By: AMBASSADR ROSS WILSON FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 002522

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/10/2017
TAGS: PREL US TU
SUBJECT: TURKISH MFA REACTION TO ARMENIAN GENOCIDE VOTE

REF: ANKARA 2517

Classified By: AMBASSADR ROSS WILSON FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D)


1. (c) Turkish MFA U/S Apakan convoked Ambassador October 11
regarding the House Foreign Affairs Committee vote on the
Armenian genocide resolution (AGR) the day before. He
expressed great appreciation for Administration efforts
against the AGR and was well aware of work by the President,
Secretaries Rice and Gates, and many other senior officials

SIPDIS
on the issue. Unfortunately, these efforts had not
succeeded. The Turkish people view the resolution with
sorrow and humiliation. It will not help Turkish-Armenian,
Turkish-American or Turkish-Israeli relations. Apakan urged
the strongest possible efforts to prevent approval by the
full House.


2. (c) Apakan deep frustration over remarks made at the HFAC
mark-up. For example, Rep. Hoyer had pointed out that the
AGR does not directly concern the present government or
Turkish nation, but rather their predecessors. However,
present-day Turkish citizens could not ignore unjustified
accusations against thier parents and grandparents. Rep.
Sherman had asserted that Turkey would express its anger for
a few days and then get over it. This was incorrect. The
real impact of the AGR will not be in angry words or
retaliatory measures, but over the medium and longer term in
the hearts and minds of Turks. Apakan said that in 10 years
time, people may look back and ask, "Who lost Turkey." This
resolution will be one of the reasons for it, and that's not
the future that he and Turkey's Westernizers want to see.


3. (c) Regarding Turkey's possible response, Apakan was
measured and mentioned no specifics. He said that of course
Turkey will have to react. It will do so with restraint and
recognition that we are and will remains allies. He stressed
that the MFA and government want to continue close
cooperation with the US. The US will, however, see different
reactions from different quarters of Turkey (e.g., the
military, the street) that the MFA cannot control. The
present government is more vulnerable than any of its
predecessors to popular, nationalist and military opinion,
and this limits its options.


4. (c) Ambassador pointed to the heavy engagement by many
Administration officials before the vote and the Department's
statement afterward. It expresses our regret over the HFAC
vote and strong continued opposition to the AGR. Our efforts
against it will continue. From the President on down, we
continue to believe that this is a matter for historians, and
that mutual understanding of the past and reconciliation
going forward are key. We also believe Turkey and the US
will remain strong partners who need each other and that this
should temper how we proceed. Ambassador cautioned against
reacting to the HFAC vote as if it were the whole House.
While avoiding passage of the AGR will be very difficult,
nothing is inevitable in politics, and strident responses
that look like threats can make a bad situation worse.


5. (c) Comment: Apakan's response was muted and, coming on
the heels of his first discussions with FM Babacan since the
latter's return from the Middle East, should be regarded as
suggesting the MFA and much of the government will seek to
retain perspective. Perhaps not the military, which today
cancelled senior-level participation in a US-hosted,
multinational naval event in coming days. Nor the media,
which is coupling coverage of the HFAC vote with lurid
pictures of Turkish forces along the border with Iraq ) as
if pugnaciously to tell angry Turks that the nation,s army
will go to war with America over the AGR in the PKK's
encampments in northern Iraq. The truth is that the
government is working to buy time and keep its options open
on both the AGR and on the PKK/northern Iraq problem -- for
now.

Visit Ankara's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/ankara/

ANKARA 00002522 002 OF 002



WILSON