Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07ANKARA1216
2007-05-21 08:44:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Ankara
how-toVZCZCXRO1034 RR RUEHAG RUEHROV DE RUEHAK #1216/01 1410844 ZNY CCCCC ZZH R 210844Z MAY 07 FM AMEMBASSY ANKARA TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2183 INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 2307
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 001216
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/17/2017
TAGS: PREL CY TU
SUBJECT: U/S APAKAN'S POINTS ON CYPRUS
REF: ANKARA 959 AND PREVIOUS
Classified By: Ambassador Ross Wilson, reasons 1.4 (b/d)
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 001216
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/17/2017
TAGS: PREL CY TU
SUBJECT: U/S APAKAN'S POINTS ON CYPRUS
REF: ANKARA 959 AND PREVIOUS
Classified By: Ambassador Ross Wilson, reasons 1.4 (b/d)
1. (C) MFA U/S Ertugrul Apakan told Ambassador on May 15
that Turkey hopes the UN report on Cyprus will contain a
reference to the May 28, 2004 UN report. Apakan complained
that the buffer zone was being extended at the expense of
Turkish Cypriots. He provided Ambassador with a paper
containing talking points which note that Turkish side wants
to maintain the July 8th approach, but that process risks
being deadlocked and President Papadopoulos has resorted to
delaying tactics (para 4).
2. (C) The UNSYG report on Cyprus was due soon, Apakan noted,
and Turkey hopes that it will retain reference to the 28 May
2004 UN report, as contained in previous years' reports. The
report emphasizes the need to ease the economic isolation of
the Turkish Cypriots.
3. (C) Turkey is not pleased that the buffer zone is being
extended at the expense of the Turkish Cypriots, Apakan told
the Ambassador. This "trick" will not be tolerated; the
buffer should include equal territory from both sides. This
is the main issue blocking movement towards re-opening the
Ledra Street crossing, according to Apakan.
4. (SBU) Begin talking point text:
The Turkish side keeps its constructive approach vis-a-vis
the 8th of July process. Hence the non-paper presented by
Pertev on the 26th April.
Unfortunately, this goodwill is not reciprocated. The
non-paper conveyed by Conis on 11th of May clearly reflects
that the Greek Cypriot side is preserving its intransigent
attitude. They insist that the issue of property is
discussed at the Technical Committees. They refuse to add
power-sharing to governance and guarantees to security.
However, this is the terminology which the Turkish Cypriot
side has taken from the UN documents.
The whole process risks being deadlocked due to the
unwillingness of the Greek Cypriot side. Papadopoulos is
resorting to delaying tactics. It is apparent that his aim
is to bury the Direct Trade Regulation. The 8th of July
process presents a unique opportunity for him to escape the
pressure of the international community.
Likewise, the so-called goodwill gestures of the Greek
Cypriot side of the last months have turned out to be fake.
Take, for example, the opening of the Lokmaci Gate.
Despite the willingness by the Turkish side to open the gate
since November 2005, the crossing is yet to open. Had the
Greek Cypriot side not put preconditions at every turn, it
would have been opened by now.
For purposes of clarification, I would like to underline that
the military unit in the area belongs to the Turkish Cypriot
forces and not to the Turkish Peace Force, and there is no
Turkish Cypriot military post at the TRNC side of the gate.
Papadopoulos is now trying to create more confusion by
bringing up the question of the status of the area which is
clearly a TRNC territory since 1974. Papadopoulos knows that
once the status issue is opened it will be subject of
discussion for many years. Thus it will prevent the opening
of the gate. Therefore, the issue of status should be
disassociated from the opening of the gate which is a
practical matter. This understanding has already been
adopted during the opening of other gates.
We hope that the Permanent Members of the UNSC will not give
credit to the Greek Cypriot maneuvers.
The upcoming UN Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP) report
will be published soon. We hope that, like in the previous
one, a reference is again made to the 28 May 2004 report of
the former UNSG which, inter alia, addressed the unjust
isolation of the Turkish Cypriot people and called for its
lifting.
Recently, our Permanent Representative to the UN sent a
letter to the UNSG Mr. Ban in which he expressed Turkey's
expectation for the endorsement by the UN Security Council of
the said report.
In this letter a copy of which I am presenting to you, he
drew attention of the UNSG to the provocative policies
pursued by the Greek Cypriot administration to represent the
whole island.
ANKARA 00001216 002 OF 002
In the UNFICYP report, we hope that the views and concerns of
the Turkish Cypriot side expressed in the letter dated 26
January 2007 addressed by the TRNC Foreign Minister to the UN
Secretary General will be duly taken into account.
SIPDIS
Since this will be the first UNFICYP report by the new
Secretary General, it is very important that it turns out to
SIPDIS
be an objective one which aptly respects the established UN
terminology, and that it does not contain any material
mistakes. We trust that you will do your utmost in this
respect.
End talking point text.
Visit Ankara's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/ankara/
WILSON
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/17/2017
TAGS: PREL CY TU
SUBJECT: U/S APAKAN'S POINTS ON CYPRUS
REF: ANKARA 959 AND PREVIOUS
Classified By: Ambassador Ross Wilson, reasons 1.4 (b/d)
1. (C) MFA U/S Ertugrul Apakan told Ambassador on May 15
that Turkey hopes the UN report on Cyprus will contain a
reference to the May 28, 2004 UN report. Apakan complained
that the buffer zone was being extended at the expense of
Turkish Cypriots. He provided Ambassador with a paper
containing talking points which note that Turkish side wants
to maintain the July 8th approach, but that process risks
being deadlocked and President Papadopoulos has resorted to
delaying tactics (para 4).
2. (C) The UNSYG report on Cyprus was due soon, Apakan noted,
and Turkey hopes that it will retain reference to the 28 May
2004 UN report, as contained in previous years' reports. The
report emphasizes the need to ease the economic isolation of
the Turkish Cypriots.
3. (C) Turkey is not pleased that the buffer zone is being
extended at the expense of the Turkish Cypriots, Apakan told
the Ambassador. This "trick" will not be tolerated; the
buffer should include equal territory from both sides. This
is the main issue blocking movement towards re-opening the
Ledra Street crossing, according to Apakan.
4. (SBU) Begin talking point text:
The Turkish side keeps its constructive approach vis-a-vis
the 8th of July process. Hence the non-paper presented by
Pertev on the 26th April.
Unfortunately, this goodwill is not reciprocated. The
non-paper conveyed by Conis on 11th of May clearly reflects
that the Greek Cypriot side is preserving its intransigent
attitude. They insist that the issue of property is
discussed at the Technical Committees. They refuse to add
power-sharing to governance and guarantees to security.
However, this is the terminology which the Turkish Cypriot
side has taken from the UN documents.
The whole process risks being deadlocked due to the
unwillingness of the Greek Cypriot side. Papadopoulos is
resorting to delaying tactics. It is apparent that his aim
is to bury the Direct Trade Regulation. The 8th of July
process presents a unique opportunity for him to escape the
pressure of the international community.
Likewise, the so-called goodwill gestures of the Greek
Cypriot side of the last months have turned out to be fake.
Take, for example, the opening of the Lokmaci Gate.
Despite the willingness by the Turkish side to open the gate
since November 2005, the crossing is yet to open. Had the
Greek Cypriot side not put preconditions at every turn, it
would have been opened by now.
For purposes of clarification, I would like to underline that
the military unit in the area belongs to the Turkish Cypriot
forces and not to the Turkish Peace Force, and there is no
Turkish Cypriot military post at the TRNC side of the gate.
Papadopoulos is now trying to create more confusion by
bringing up the question of the status of the area which is
clearly a TRNC territory since 1974. Papadopoulos knows that
once the status issue is opened it will be subject of
discussion for many years. Thus it will prevent the opening
of the gate. Therefore, the issue of status should be
disassociated from the opening of the gate which is a
practical matter. This understanding has already been
adopted during the opening of other gates.
We hope that the Permanent Members of the UNSC will not give
credit to the Greek Cypriot maneuvers.
The upcoming UN Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP) report
will be published soon. We hope that, like in the previous
one, a reference is again made to the 28 May 2004 report of
the former UNSG which, inter alia, addressed the unjust
isolation of the Turkish Cypriot people and called for its
lifting.
Recently, our Permanent Representative to the UN sent a
letter to the UNSG Mr. Ban in which he expressed Turkey's
expectation for the endorsement by the UN Security Council of
the said report.
In this letter a copy of which I am presenting to you, he
drew attention of the UNSG to the provocative policies
pursued by the Greek Cypriot administration to represent the
whole island.
ANKARA 00001216 002 OF 002
In the UNFICYP report, we hope that the views and concerns of
the Turkish Cypriot side expressed in the letter dated 26
January 2007 addressed by the TRNC Foreign Minister to the UN
Secretary General will be duly taken into account.
SIPDIS
Since this will be the first UNFICYP report by the new
Secretary General, it is very important that it turns out to
SIPDIS
be an objective one which aptly respects the established UN
terminology, and that it does not contain any material
mistakes. We trust that you will do your utmost in this
respect.
End talking point text.
Visit Ankara's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/ankara/
WILSON