Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07ADDISABABA2177
2007-07-12 09:13:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Addis Ababa
Cable title:  

ETHIOPIA: PROSECUTION RECOMMENDS DEATH PENALTY FOR

Tags:  PHUM KJUS KDEM PGOV ET 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO0362
OO RUEHROV
DE RUEHDS #2177/01 1930913
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 120913Z JUL 07
FM AMEMBASSY ADDIS ABABA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 6959
INFO RUCNIAD/IGAD COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/CJTF HOA PRIORITY
RUEKDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
RUEHLMC/MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORP WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY 0047
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ADDIS ABABA 002177 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR AF/E AND DRL: S.JOSEPH
LONDON, PARIS, ROME FOR AFRICA WATCHER
CJTF-HOA AND USCENTCOM FOR POLAD

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/09/2017
TAGS: PHUM KJUS KDEM PGOV ET
SUBJECT: ETHIOPIA: PROSECUTION RECOMMENDS DEATH PENALTY FOR
CONVICTED CUD LEADERSHIP

REF: ADDIS ABABA 02005 AND PREVIOUS

ADDIS ABAB 00002177 001.2 OF 002


Classified By: SEAN CELY, ACTING POL-ECON COUNSELOR. REASON: 1.4 (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ADDIS ABABA 002177

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR AF/E AND DRL: S.JOSEPH
LONDON, PARIS, ROME FOR AFRICA WATCHER
CJTF-HOA AND USCENTCOM FOR POLAD

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/09/2017
TAGS: PHUM KJUS KDEM PGOV ET
SUBJECT: ETHIOPIA: PROSECUTION RECOMMENDS DEATH PENALTY FOR
CONVICTED CUD LEADERSHIP

REF: ADDIS ABABA 02005 AND PREVIOUS

ADDIS ABAB 00002177 001.2 OF 002


Classified By: SEAN CELY, ACTING POL-ECON COUNSELOR. REASON: 1.4 (d).


1. (C) SUMMARY. On July 9, the prosecution recommended the
death penalty for the 38 opposition Coalition for Unity and
Democracy (CUD) leaders and journalists found guilty on June
11 on charges of subversion. However, final sentencing has
been postponed until July 16. Meanwhile, the negotiation
process led by the Ethiopian Elders continues. All
defendants, except for two civil society representatives,
have signed a private letter expressing regret for their
actions following the May 2005 elections. Once the judicial
process concludes next week for the convicted defendants, all
those who have signed this letter are expected to be
released. Elders continue their discussions with senior GoE
leadership and the detainees in preparation for eventual
release. END SUMMARY.

-------------- --------------
HARSHEST SENTENCES SOUGHT, BUT DEFENDANTS NOT MOVED
-------------- --------------


2. (U) All 38 defendants previously found guilty were present
for the July 9 session. Those nine defendants still
defending themselves were not in court. Only one defense
attorney attended: Wondawik Ayele, who represents nine of
the 38 convicted, as well as six of those still defending
themselves. Defense attorney Colonel Mengistu, who
represents civil society representatives Daniel Bekele and
Netsanet Demissie, did not attend.


3. (U) Lead judge Adil Ahmed began by saying that the purpose
of the session was to hear statements from both the
prosecution and the defense, and then for the bench to give
their final sentencing. He reported that both the
prosecution and the nine defendants represented by Wondawik
had submitted their final recommendations on sentencing.
However, some defendants (he did not specify who) requested
to hear the prosecution's recommendation before filing their

own statement(s). Therefore, Adil announced, only the
prosecution would be heard today, and the defense would then
have an opportunity to respond in writing, to be submitted to
the court registrar.


4. (U) The prosecution's statement began by recapping the
charges, referring to applicable articles in the criminal
code, and stating the allowable sentences under the specific
charges. On Charge 1 (Outrages Against the Constitution:
penalty 3-25 years or "when the crime has entailed serious
crises against public security ) life imprisonment or the
death penalty"),the prosecutor stated the following: "The
defendants' act of outrage against the constitution
threatened to disintegrate the nation. As of result of their
actions, the violence that broke out caused the loss of many
lives and a great deal of property damage. If the government
had not taken action, the situation could have been much
worse. This criminal act caused a serious social crisis.
They called for these actions at a time when the government
had instituted a ban on demonstrations. This was a terrorist
act on their part. Therefore, by the guidelines of article
258 of the criminal code (Aggravation to a Crime),the
defendants charged under charge 1 should receive the death
penalty." (Note: All 38 defendants were convicted under
charge 1. End Note.) The prosecutor also recommended that
publishing houses that were found guilty on charge 1 should
face the maximum penalty: a 500,000 birr fine (approximately
USD 50,000).


5. (U) Regarding the remaining charges (Charge 2 )
"Obstruction of the Exercise of Constitutional Powers,:
penalty: up to 15 years; Charge 3 - "Inciting, Organizing or
leading an Armed Rebellion," penalty: life imprisonment or
death; Charge 5 ) "Impairing the Defensive Powers of the
State," penalty: 5-25 years, or "in cases of exceptional
gravity ) life imprisonment or the death penalty") the
prosecution recommended the maximum penalty. Though he did
not specifically state the reason for such a recommendation,
he said that for charges 3 and 5, the defendants should
receive the death penalty.


ADDIS ABAB 00002177 002.2 OF 002



6. (U) The prosecution finished the 10-minute statement by
recommending that the defendants also be subject to article
123 of the criminal code, Deprivation of Rights, which states
that in certain circumstances, the civil rights of a
defendant (including the right to run for public office) can
be limited by decision of the court.


7. (SBU) Lead judge Adil then announced that the defendants
would have until July 11 to complete their statement(s). He
then adjourned until July 16. Though the prosecution's
recommendation had been widely rumored before the session,
family members were visibly upset after the ruling, while
defendants seemed unfazed. Many defendants were attempting
to calm their friends and family as they left the courtroom.

-------------- --------------
DESPITE RECOMMENDATION, ELDERS' PROCESS CONTINUES
-------------- --------------


8. (C) COMMENT. The July 9 session produced the anticipated
result from the prosecution--a recommendation for the death
penalty. However, this was not followed immediately by a
response from the defense, nor by a judgment from the bench,
as was expected. Instead, because some defendants requested
time to contemplate a response after the prosecution's
statement, the court adjourned for another week. The
prosecution's recommendation, and lack of immediate response
from the court, will undoubtedly fuel further speculation and
rumors on the direction of the trial. However, the Elders
continue to work around the clock to finalize details on the
detainees' release, and Post remains hopeful that a
resolution will be achieved. Any highly critical statements
in the media or by the international community will only
serve to undo what they have accomplished over the last
several months. Post recommends that public statements
adhere to agreed upon guidance. END COMMENT.
YAMAMOTO