Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06ZAGREB448
2006-04-06 14:56:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Zagreb
Cable title:  

GOC'S REFUGEE PROGRAMS: PUTTING THEIR MONEY WHERE

Tags:  PREF PGOV HR 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO2795
RR RUEHAG RUEHDA RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHLN RUEHLZ
RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHVB #0448/01 0961456
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 061456Z APR 06 ZDK
FM AMEMBASSY ZAGREB
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5966
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 ZAGREB 000448 

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR PRM: ROLSON
DEPT FOR EUR/SCE: BBELL, JMITCHELL
BELGRADE FOR SCHEEVER
SARAJEVO FOR RMEYERS
SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREF PGOV HR

SUBJECT: GOC'S REFUGEE PROGRAMS: PUTTING THEIR MONEY WHERE
THEIR MOUTH IS

Ref: Zagreb 173

ZAGREB 00000448 001.2 OF 003


Sensitive But Unclassified. Please Handle Accordingly.

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 ZAGREB 000448

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR PRM: ROLSON
DEPT FOR EUR/SCE: BBELL, JMITCHELL
BELGRADE FOR SCHEEVER
SARAJEVO FOR RMEYERS
SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREF PGOV HR

SUBJECT: GOC'S REFUGEE PROGRAMS: PUTTING THEIR MONEY WHERE
THEIR MOUTH IS

Ref: Zagreb 173

ZAGREB 00000448 001.2 OF 003


Sensitive But Unclassified. Please Handle Accordingly.


1. (SBU) Summary and Comment. Ambassador and Principals
from the EU, UNHCR, and the OSCE convened with Minister
Bozidar Kalmeta on 15 March to review the month's progress
on refugee issues. The Minister provided the GOC's
sizeable financial commitments, which total $350 million in
2006 - or one percent of Croatia's GDP. Due in part to
Post's activism, the GOC has stepped up its re-
electrification program and hopes to finish by 2007. With
IC assistance, the GOC has developed a draft solution for
handling property investment claims of temporary occupants,
which should help resolve the 25 outstanding cases.
Progress on the housing care program (occupancy and tenancy
rights, or OTR) remains slow: the GOC has only resolved a
small number of applications. Kalmeta presented a
comprehensive and ambitious housing implementation plan.
If the GOC does implement the program in a timely manner,
they will make a significant step this year towards
completion. However, the GOC needs to update its entire
refugee "Road Map" and commit to quickly resolving
outstanding issues. Areas such as residency status and
investment claims are much more straightforward (and
inexpensive) than complex programs such as housing, and
therefore could be quickly settled.


2. (SBU) In a related meeting on 27 March, the three
international organizations met with their colleagues from
SAM and B-H to revive the stalled Sarajevo Declaration
process. The most contentious issue within those missions
remains Croatia's progress on resolving OTR. The group
sent a mildly-worded letter to leaders of the three
countries noting that they are behind schedule and
requesting resolution of the outstanding issues. They
specifically addressed OTR in Croatia and local integration
of refugees in SAM. Head of the OSCE Mission in Croatia
Ambassador Jorge Fuentes told us that he believes the GOC
is not getting credit in the region for the progress they
have made. We are encouraged by the GOC's implementation
plans as they are more specific than in the past. Post,

along with other IC members, will continue pressing the GOC
to resolve outstanding issues and ensure completion of
their commitments. End Summary and Comment.

The Bottom Line: Financial commitments


3. (U) Minister Kalmeta presented to the Principals the
large financial commitments required to close the refugee
portfolio. In 2006, the GOC plans to spend a total of $350
million from all Ministries on refugee-related programs.
Kalmeta's budget advisor told us that figure represents
about 1 percent of Croatia's GDP, indicating that refugees
are an issue that they are actively working to resolve.
Kalmeta's Ministry's budget this year is $275 million for
these programs, and he told us that the 2007 budget will be
similar; as reconstruction funds sunset because of program
completion, the GOC will reallocate those funds for social
and economic recovery programs in the war-affected areas.


4. (U) For 2006, the GOC has budgeted $114 million for
house reconstruction that will largely be completed this
year. Ninety-one million dollars will be allocated for
reconstruction of utilities and infrastructure projects and
about $50 million will be spent on demining (about one
quarter of which comes from donor funds). A general fund
for refugee, returnee, and IDP assistance totals $27
million. In addition, another $68 million will be
allocated for various housing and construction programs
primarily in war-affected areas.

Plugging in Returnee Villages


5. (U) The GOC plans to increase the pace of re-
electrification and complete it by 2007 (although OSCE
estimates it will take another three years). The state-
owned electricity company, HEP, will have a sizeable profit
for 2006 and will reinvest about $8.3 million of it towards
re-electrification. Next year they anticipate similar
profit and reinvestment. In total, the GOC will spend $20
million on re-electrification this year, which includes
about 30 ethnic Serb villages. According to this plan,
about 200 ethnic Serb villages will remain to be connected.
In April, the Ambassador will visit for the second time an

ZAGREB 00000448 002.2 OF 003


ethnic Serb returnee village that was recently re-
electrified after more than seven years of darkness.

Recognizing Occupancy and Tenancy Rights


6. (SBU) Prior to the meeting, Post and other IC members
received from the Ministry a detailed plan for former
holders of occupancy and tenancy rights (OTR). The four-
year implementation plan foresees the expenditure of $200
million for the purchase and construction of 3,875
apartments in mostly urban areas and the expenditure of
$123 million for similar apartments in the war-affected
areas. Funds will be secured in part by potential loans
from IFIs. There are a total of 8,500 applications that
the GOC intends to resolve within the year. The GOC will
provide a breakdown with specific annual targets for the
program, which includes purchase of 400 apartments in 2006.


7. (U) The construction of extra apartment blocks,
particularly in urban centres such as Osijek, Karlovac and
Sisak, will start at the beginning of 2007. In the
meantime, the GOC has promised to keep Principals informed
on a monthly basis of the preparations for construction
(urban planning, purchase of building sites, and the
process of issuing public tenders). Principals asked that
the GOC avoid ghettoization of Croatian Serbs through an
allocation of apartments in ethnically mixed areas.


8. (SBU) State Secretary Damir Spancic reported OTR
progress to the Principals in the past month. His office
has sent notices to 800 former OTR holders that their
applications have been approved and noted that the GOC has
allocated apartments to an additional 18 families since the
prior meeting. Kalmeta told the Principals that the
program's implementation is only constrained by the GOC's
general financial restrictions. The IC noted that the pace
of allocation needs to increase in order to close the
portfolio anytime soon.

Resolving Unsolicited Property Investments


9. (SBU) Currently there are about 25 legal cases of
temporary occupants who are requesting compensation from
owners for improvements they made to a property while they
lived in or operated a business out of it. These cases,
while often egregious, are few, and the IC and the GOC are
collaborating to develop a solution. Working with the
State Attorney's Office, the Ministry drafted a protocol by
which the State would settle those cases after the court's
final outcome. OSCE and others suggest that the GOC
intervene to resolve those cases before the court decision.
Given the small scope of the problem, Fuentes noted, it is
best for the GOC to be proactive and not to involve the
owners in the resolution at all. In our working level
meetings, Spancic agreed to such a solution and indicated
that the owners will be informed and will not be
financially liable.

Regulating Resident Status


10. (SBU) Another outstanding issue for refugees is their
ability to regulate their resident status. Without clear
status, they are unable to access refugee or state programs
such as health care, education, etc. The deadline to do so
expired in June, 2005 and the GOC has processed most of the
individuals who applied. However, several thousand people
did not meet the residency requirement as they were not
present during the war. The law is being redrafted to meet
EU regulations, although that version does not include an
exemption from general requirements for refugees. The IC
has requested re-opening the deadline and redrafting the
law. Kalmeta advised the IC to raise the issue with the
Prime Minister.

OSCE: Coordinating Views Regionally


11. (SBU) In a separate meeting between the IC Principals,
Fuentes told Ambassador about the regional divergence of
opinions within the OSCE. Fuentes recognizes Croatia's
moderate progress and in fact recently commended the GOC
for its attention to national minorities. However,
missions in neighboring B-H and SAM believe that the GOC
needs to do more, particularly in resolving the OTR issue.
Croatia is losing the "diplomatic campaign", he added, in
that they are neither clearly explaining their efforts nor

ZAGREB 00000448 003.2 OF 003


getting credit for the progress they have made. Following
the success of the monthly refugee meetings, the GOC has
agreed to establish monthly OSCE meeting with the Ministers
of Justice and Foreign Affairs to encourage progress on
other OSCE-mandate issues.


12. (SBU) In order to better coordinate their regional
position on refugee issues, the three OSCE missions met in
January. They agreed on a common position for OTR but have
not resolved details: Croatia, they believe, should speed
up implementation of the OTR program and devise a mechanism
for all former OTR holders not included in the program.
This would be a "Fair Compensation Settlement". OSCE in
Croatia suggests that compensation for those who plan to
remain in SAM and B-H be settled in a future succession
agreement. It envisages that the IC find donors to provide
money or construction material for former OTR owners who do
not wish to return. OSCE in SAM and B-H want compensation
for those who do not wish to return and presume that funds
would come from the GOC. They have not evaluated the scope
of either compensation plan.


13. (SBU) The missions agreed that Croatia does not need to
amend the Law on Reconstruction, as implementation is
included in its Road Map. However, they still want to see
progress on several issues that have not been included in
the Road Map. Specifically: sharing of war crime lists
with regional partners in line with judicial cooperation
agreements. (Note: Croatia has already shared its list
with the GOSAM); recognition of documents including years
worked in Serb controlled areas; regulation of permanent
and temporary resident status; resolving unsolicited
investment claims; improving minority representation in
state administration; and returning agricultural land and
business premises.
FRANK